Sentences with phrase «income children as»

Additionally, Epps has begun to examine the health disparities of low - income children as part of a National Institute of Health (NIH) two - year grant, which will repay 50 percent of her student loans.

This shift has been stimulated by a combination of influences, including greater demand by families at all economic levels, increased public understanding of the importance of early learning, greater support for investment in programs for low income children as a matter of equity, and growing concern about the threat of economic globalization and the need to enhance the nation's human capital by building a strong foundation early in life

Along the way, certainly, those efforts have produced individual successes — schools and programs that make a genuine difference for some low - income students — but they have led to little or no improvement in the performance of low - income children as a whole.

Not exact matches

Additionally, they noted that those who were more likely to push back against their superiors as children «also have higher levels of willingness to stand up for their own interests and aims, a characteristic that leads to more favorable individual outcomes — in our case, income.»

Though I was granted limited duration alimony and child support as part of my divorce agreement, I needed another source of income to meet my monthly expenses as well as secure my financial future.

Children from high - income families are 10 times as likely to become inventors as those from low - income families.

A growing opportunity gap in access to resources, opportunities, and adult investment has emerged over the last 25 years as income inequality has accelerated, especially among families with children.

As the law stands now, undocumented parents can receive a federal income tax credit up to $ 1,000 annually for each child, the vast majority of whom are American citizens.

The CBPP found in a recent study that 16 million children in low - income families would be excluded from the benefit entirely, as their parents don't make enough to pay federal taxes and thus receive a refund.

The advantage: if your child, not you, owns the investment and receives the income, you might be able to save as much as 25 % of the tax bite you would otherwise incur.

So channel as much of your income as possible into legally protected personal assets such as a 401 (k) plan and college savings accounts in your children's names.

So I had to factor in future child care as well as college savings into the mix, on a single income.

The child care «cliff effect,» as it's called, is a serious problem for low - income working families, says Jennifer Greenfield, a professor of social work at the University of Denver.

The prevailing estimates criticized in the report, such as a 2011 MoneySense article claiming the total cost of raising a typical 18 - year - old child is $ 243,660, send a message to lower - income families that they shouldn't have kids, the report says.

[10] Examples of money income — sometimes referred to as «cash income» — include: wages and salaries; income from dividends; earnings from self - employment; rental income; child support and alimony payments; Social Security, disability, and unemployment benefits; cash welfare assistance; and pensions and other retirement income.

CBO's measure of before - tax comprehensive income includes all cash income (including non-taxable income not reported on tax returns, such as child support), taxes paid by businesses, [15] employees» contributions to 401 (k) retirement plans, and the estimated value of in - kind income received from various sources (such as food stamps, Medicare and Medicaid, and employer - paid health insurance premiums).

Additional information about yourself that you voluntarily provide to us, such as your hobbies, personal interests, household income range, number of children, gender, demographic information, and product and service preferences.

In 2018 families with a net income of less than $ 30,000 (as income rises, payments are reduced) will receive $ 6,400 per year for each child under the age of six and $ 5,400 per year for each child aged six to 17.

At this point, across - the - board rate cuts will be in effect, as well as a doubled child tax credit and a nearly doubled standard deduction (the latter two provisions offsetting the elimination of personal exemptions from the individual income tax).

Prof. Wolfson and co-author Scott Legree of the University of Waterloo have now completed a new report, called Private Companies, Professionals and Income Splitting, to consider how much income is flowing from CCPCs to spouses or adult children who are living at the same address as the company owner, which could indicate a tax - reduction strategy by splitting income with lower - earning family meIncome Splitting, to consider how much income is flowing from CCPCs to spouses or adult children who are living at the same address as the company owner, which could indicate a tax - reduction strategy by splitting income with lower - earning family meincome is flowing from CCPCs to spouses or adult children who are living at the same address as the company owner, which could indicate a tax - reduction strategy by splitting income with lower - earning family meincome with lower - earning family members.

A paper co-authored by University of Ottawa Professor Michael Wolfson, one of Canada's top researchers on income and equality issues, said there was much debate of Ottawa's new program this year allowing some income splitting for couples with children, but most people don't realize income splitting has long existed for thousands of professionals such as doctors and lawyers who have been able to funnel their incomes through private companies they create to hold their income.

For example, refundable tax credits such as the Canada Child Tax Benefit, the Working Income Tax Benefit, the Scientific Research and Experiment Development Tax Credit, among others, are classified as expenses in the Budget, but are not included as spending in the Main Estimates.

One caveat: If your child is the beneficiary of a 529 account that belongs to someone outside the immediate family, the value of the plan doesn't get factored into the federal financial aid formula, but withdrawals are treated as student income.

Even if you're a stay - at - home parent without an income, your family would feel the financial impact of your absence because the contributions you made, such as child care, would have to be outsourced.

Most recently, it includes the «family tax cut», better known as income splitting for families with children under the age of eighteen, along with enrichments to the Universal Child Care Benefit (offset by the elimination of the Child Tax Credit) and to the youth fitness tax credit.

Note: If you want to consolidate a defaulted PLUS loan that you obtained as a parent to pay for your child's education, the only income - driven plan you can choose is the Income - Contingent Repayment Plan (ICR income - driven plan you can choose is the Income - Contingent Repayment Plan (ICR Income - Contingent Repayment Plan (ICR Plan).

This includes income splitting for couples with children, the Children's Fitness Tax Credit, the Children's Arts Tax Credit, the Education Tax Credit and the Textbook Tax Credit (other tax credits may be on the chopping block, too, as the government wraps up its review of the tachildren, the Children's Fitness Tax Credit, the Children's Arts Tax Credit, the Education Tax Credit and the Textbook Tax Credit (other tax credits may be on the chopping block, too, as the government wraps up its review of the taChildren's Fitness Tax Credit, the Children's Arts Tax Credit, the Education Tax Credit and the Textbook Tax Credit (other tax credits may be on the chopping block, too, as the government wraps up its review of the taChildren's Arts Tax Credit, the Education Tax Credit and the Textbook Tax Credit (other tax credits may be on the chopping block, too, as the government wraps up its review of the tax code).

During the pre-approval process, your lender will take a complete loan application which includes performing an income and asset verification, and he will account for specific loan traits which may affect your final approval such as your personal credit scores, any required child support payments, and the availability of a co-signer, as examples.

Income from certain sources (such as unemployment compensation, dividends, interest, worker's compensation, welfare, social security, or child support) is not considered «earned income.&Income from certain sources (such as unemployment compensation, dividends, interest, worker's compensation, welfare, social security, or child support) is not considered «earned income.&income.»

As your child grows, the Franklin Templeton age - based asset allocations will automatically reallocate a percentage of your assets from equity - oriented funds (which tend to hold more stocks) into more conservative, income - seeking funds (such as bond and money market fundsAs your child grows, the Franklin Templeton age - based asset allocations will automatically reallocate a percentage of your assets from equity - oriented funds (which tend to hold more stocks) into more conservative, income - seeking funds (such as bond and money market fundsas bond and money market funds).

You may also be asked to show proof that alimony and child support payments have been made in the past reliably, so that the lender may use the income as part of your VA loan application.

Under generally - accepted accounting principles, the WITB should be included as part of program expenses (like the Canada Child Tax Benefit) rather than being netted against personal income tax revenues.

There's such a thing as the child tax credit income phase - out.

As your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) increases, the child tax credit begins to phase out.

However, the Liberal platform also envisaged temporary deficits to finance higher spending on social programs such as child benefits, a higher Guaranteed Income Supplement for single seniors, public health care, child care and First Nations programs, and did not increase overall federal tax revenues.

33 — Divorced deeply troubled woman — stupidly agreed to $ 1600 / month in child support (son was 9 at time); should have fought this as this was based on old income and not what I was really making.

There a great deal exponentially increasing headwinds as you push to higher incomes (much higher taxes, required child care for two working parents, professional school student loans).

Yet low income lines and family income tested programs such as the Guaranteed Income Supplement and child tax benefits do assume couples share income with each income lines and family income tested programs such as the Guaranteed Income Supplement and child tax benefits do assume couples share income with each income tested programs such as the Guaranteed Income Supplement and child tax benefits do assume couples share income with each Income Supplement and child tax benefits do assume couples share income with each income with each other.

As income increases family size decreases and children become a luxury as opposed to a necessitAs income increases family size decreases and children become a luxury as opposed to a necessitas opposed to a necessity.

This goes for relational things, family items, income, support and raising of children in fatherless homes, as well as STI's the lifelong consequences of which are also considerably worse for women.

By saying it is up to the parents then a parent could kill a 6 month old and just say I diddnt see it as a child / human because of various reasons like he is dependant on my income etc...

Second, I would ask the candidate to abolish the local property tax as the source of school funding and instead fund the public education of every American child out of the federal income tax.

Such children are disadvantaged whatever the income of their parents and whether their trouble is defined as mental illness or something else.

She reported, as required, the change in her income that disqualified her for child care assistance.

1) Churches need to be a voice for economic justice for lower - income families by, for instance, advocating for more generous child and earned - income tax credits, as well as for the elimination of the marriage penalties embedded in many of our public policies directed towards lower - income families.

Of course, a few straight - forward deductions / credits, such as the child tax credit could remain, particularly because by it's very nature it's going to benefit the rich less (ie: the number of children in a family do not go up in proportion to the amount of income)

We aren't a particularly wealthy family (we have a single income, and that is in pastoral ministry), nor are we particularly exceptional parents, nor are we particularly well - positioned to have as many children as possible.

During that decade purchases of goods and services for children by government rose very rapidly, as did real household income per child, and the poverty rate of children plummeted.

The pattern of overprotection is difficult to break because the spouse is usually protecting herself, the children, the family reputation, and perhaps the family income, as well as the alcoholic.

It is fear, it is torture, it is the impact on the family, it is the loss of work and income, it is the tragedy that affects children when they see the violence used in taking their father away and demolishing him as a person, it is the amazing deterioration of life's possibilities, it is losing one's dreams to become a professional and independent person or becoming someone who could participate more actively in democracy.»