The gaps in life, health, and school experiences of minority and low -
income children just won't go away.
Not exact matches
«We don't think it's appropriate that they are reducing their
income, and therefore their taxes,
just because they have
children or a spouse.»
This
income - splitting initiative was paid for by eliminating the
child tax credit, which goes to all families with
children and also cost
just under $ 2billioin a year.
By saying it is up to the parents then a parent could kill a 6 month old and
just say I diddnt see it as a
child / human because of various reasons like he is dependant on my
income etc...
Well - off kids have on average more access to books and other printed materials;
just as important, their parents speak to them more than low -
income parents speak to their
children — by some estimates, far more — and the speech they use is more complex.
And these days, unless
children from poor families get a college degree, their economic mobility is severely restricted: Young people who grow up in families in the lowest
income quintile (with household
income below about $ 21,500) and don't obtain a B.A. now have
just a one in two chance of escaping that bottom economic bracket as adults.
When you visit a school like WHEELS or Polaris, it is hard not to feel hopeful, not
just for the prospects of the students there, but for the possibility that a new approach to educating low -
income children, rooted in the science of adversity, might be taking hold more broadly.
Parents, moms or dads, single or married, are not heroes; we're
just people who decided to have
children no matter what — our age, our health, our relationships status, our education, our
income, our race, our religion, our gender.
Of particular concern are those
children with family
incomes just above 185 percent of the poverty line.
I was a teen mom and I've been divorced for 3 years this summer, with one
income and no
child support, I'm still above the poverty level which I must say is not set to be «living wage» because people like me, who are
just above it, have a hard time making ends meet.
We don't ask for
income specifics,
just if they have any assistance, what they do for work or their spouse (if applicable), how many
children in diapers, etc..
They opted to stay home with their
children and said the extra money saved on diapering helped them reset their budget for
just one
income.
Just over half of low -
income children who participate in school lunch also participate in school breakfast.
Nearly 1.1 million low -
income children benefited from afterschool suppers in October 2016, up from
just 200,000
children in October 2011, according to «Afterschool Suppers: A Snapshot of Participation,» FRAC's first - ever report on participation data, nationally and by state, in the Afterschool Nutrition Programs.
Just 1 in 5
children is breastfed for 12 months in high -
income countries, while a third of
children aged between 6 months and 2 years receive no breast milk at all in low - and middle -
income countries.
While the USDA
Child Nutrition Program is critical for ensuring that low
income children receive healthy meals, it also allows day - care providers to receive compensation for the foods they serve all their day - care
children, not
just those who are low
income.
Good for Boulder to be able to raise money to help their low
income kids, but in Boulder those kids represent
just 18 % of public school
children.
I don't know an exact figure, but certainly 35 cents, even if it applied to every meal served to every
child regardless of family
income (and not
just 35 cents extra per lunch served to a
child qualified for free) is not enough.
Whether you were a
child in grade school or a university student, summer meant freedom from study and responsibility, the opportunity to work a job and have plenty of disposable
income at hand, or even
just to laze about all summer enjoying your life of irresponsibility and freedom.
Just 1 in 5
children in high -
income countries are breastfed to 12 months, whilst only 1 in 3
children in low and middle -
income countries are exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months.
With
just seven per cent of gifted and talent pupils receiving free school meals, the Liberal Democrats point out
children from low
income families are half as likely to be identified as gifted.
Those in receipt of working - age benefits including -
child benefit,
child tax credit,
income support, universal credit and jobseekers» allowance - have more reason than most to worry about inflation as all of these have
just been frozen for four years, along with local housing allowances which determine housing benefit rates.
With the 2016 legislative session
just getting underway, parent advocates who live in low -
income communities across New York City and have
children who attend both district and charter schools wanted to make sure their voices were heard.
The Tories» relief that the
child poverty figures
just published in the official Households Below Average
Income (HBAI) statistics didn't show an increase was palpable.
Labour has attacked the coalition for the «unfairness» of the cut, pointing out that two parents with a combined
income of # 87,998 can still receive the benefit if neither earns over # 44,000 - while a single parent earning
just over the limit will lose all their
child benefit.
A couple of years ago it actually carried out a consultation on measuring
child poverty: 213 respondents said
income should be included in a measure of poverty and
just two said it shouldn't.
I hear all the time about pensioners struggling to help their
children put down deposits on first homes, after a multi-decade property boom that has seen houses in some areas increase in value one hundredfold in
just 40 years, lifting even modest family homes way out of the reach of those on ordinary
incomes.
For example, fully 60 % of families in the bottom
income quintile would like, but can not afford, to take their
children away on holiday for
just one week a year.
«Having put in place more focused ways of incentivising work and directly supporting
children and pensioners at a cost of # 3bn a year, I can now return
income tax to
just two rates by removing the 10p band on non savings
income.»
Essentially, the claim the Chancellor made stems from that IFS statement - that if the Conservatives want to make the savings they claim they can from the policy, they would not be able to restrict the removal of
child tax credits to households on higher
incomes - they would have to start the cuts
just above # 30,000.
The Claim Alistair Darling told George Osborne that his policy of «taking
child tax credits away from households where their
income doesn't exceed
just over # 30,000, that is doing nothing to help.»
When asked about support for a proposal «that would allow low - and moderate -
income four - year - old
children to be given the opportunity to attend a preschool program, with the government paying the tuition,» no less than 60 percent of the public responded favorably, with
just 27 percent voicing opposition.
«We found that the brains of
children from lower -
income families benefitted from conversational interplay
just as much as the brains of
children from higher
income families,» says Gabrieli, the Grover Hermann Professor of Health Sciences and Technology at MIT and an investigator at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research.
The problem, however, is that
just 10 to 15 percent of low -
income children actually complete a college degree.
Among
children from the bottom third of the
income distribution, Kelly estimates,
just 14 percent will complete four - year degrees.
In their study of mother -
child pairs from low -
income families, they found that mothers who used many different words (not
just many words) had toddlers with faster growth in vocabulary use.
No surprise, the difference in access to devices and to the apps on them leads to different usage figures: 55 percent of
children from higher -
income families have used a cell phone, iPod, iPad or similar device to play games, watch videos or use apps, whereas
just 22 percent of
children from low -
income families have done so.
Children from families with few resources or low income but who have been provided with a good home learning environment are just as likely to do well at school as children from better - resource
Children from families with few resources or low
income but who have been provided with a good home learning environment are
just as likely to do well at school as
children from better - resource
children from better - resourced homes.
One likely explanation for the across - the - board increase in parents» investing in their young
children's learning is that parents today are
just far more aware of the unique importance of the early childhood years in shaping their
children's development... It also may be that the increase in parent -
child interactions among low -
income families has been driven, in part, by the shift of low -
income children out of preschool programs and into parental care during the economic recession.
In her speech, Secretary DeVos argued that it is never
just to restrict parents» choices, especially low -
income parents with few options and whose
children face the most dire consequences if they do not succeed in school.
Is school choice
just for certain student groups, like low -
income children, or can it actually change the public school system?
Significantly,
income diversity offers substantial benefits for every
child in the classroom, not
just those who are disadvantaged.
Children from low -
income families are
just as capable of achieving well at nursery as their friends from better - off backgrounds.
Lower
income families and students get pushed out of neighborhoods they once occupied and pushed directly into schools with lower resources and money, a cycle some parents seem to be fine with
just as long as their
child is being served.
But these low -
income children were mostly the kids of Harvard and MIT grad students who
just happened to qualify for free lunches while their parents were getting PhDs.
Families in the lowest
income quintile, for instance, earn
just $ 29,000, and for them, paying $ 6,600 for
child care is simply out of reach.
However, the authors say, if students would
just stay in their zones, NYC schools would be less segregated and «
children also would be more evenly distributed by race, language status, and
income throughout the public schools than they are now.»
Perhaps with this well - documented rise of student homelessness, lawmakers will start to think about better ways to strategically allocate Title I education dollars — not
just to low -
income children, but to the low -
income children who need them the most.
Under new legislation,
children from low -
income families will receive
just 12 hours of early learning support a week, adding to the risk of these
children falling behind their peers at school.
Secondly, Ministers want to cater for the «
Just About Managing» families by giving priority to the
Income Deprivation Affecting
Children Index (IDACI).