Sentences with phrase «income electricity consumers»

They said that the subsidies come at the expense of city dwellers without solar - ready roofs, low - income electricity consumers, and investments in other forms of renewable energy.

Not exact matches

Subtitle B: Disposition of Allowances -(Sec. 321) Amends the CAA to set forth provisions governing the disposition of emission allowances, including specifying allocations: (1) for supplemental emissions reductions from reduced deforestation; (2) for the benefit of electricity, natural gas, and / or home heating oil and propane consumers; (3) for auction, with proceeds for the benefit of low income consumers and worker investment; (4) to energy - intensive, trade - exposed industries; (5) for the deployment of carbon capture and sequestration technology; (6) to invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy; (7) to be distributed to Energy Innovation Hubs and advanced energy research; (8) to invest in the development and deployment of clean vehicles; (9) to domestic petroleum refineries and small business refiners; (10) for domestic and international adaptation; (11) for domestic wildlife and natural resource adaptation; and (12) for international clean technology deployment.

- Lower U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by $ 51 billion on average every year through 2030 - Lead to 224,000 fewer U.S. jobs on average every year through 2030 - Force U.S. consumers to pay $ 289 billion more for electricity through 2030 - Lower total disposable income for U.S. households by $ 586 billion through 2030

A system based on price - responsive - load would be able to remove this insurance component from at least some of the electricity supply and thus provide lower prices to consumers without reducing income to generators.

It disproportionately hurts low income communities and seniors — The carbon tax is by nature regressive, because it will raise the prices of gasoline, electricity, and other goods by the same dollar amount for all consumers, regardless of their incomes.

By 2030 the regulations will cost 224,000 jobs, force US consumers to pay $ 289 billion more for electricity, and lower disposable incomes for American households by $ 586 billion, the US Chamber of Commerce calculates.

Indeed, the abundance of domestic natural gas is helping lower consumer energy costs for U.S. consumers — including those in the Northeast, which historically has paid more for electricity than other parts of the country — and increasing average annual household disposable income by $ 1,200.

It's one thing to destroy coal in favor of more expensive energy in an advanced economy where consumers have more disposable income to absorb the blow of rising energy costs, but to deny developing countries access to electricity is an absurd form of «liberalism.»

Electricity bills can be very expensive specifically for low - income families who spend 10 percent of their income on electricity bills, four times higher than the averagElectricity bills can be very expensive specifically for low - income families who spend 10 percent of their income on electricity bills, four times higher than the averagelectricity bills, four times higher than the average consumer.

Assuming a $ 30 / tonne CO2 tax and all of this is passed onto consumers, households below mean are fully compensated, households above mean would be paying less 2 % of income mainly on higher electricity, vehicle fuel and gas heat.

According to UCS analysis, developing a national market for renewable power will create jobs, increase farm income and lead to significant consumer savings on electricity bills.