Sentences with phrase «income households with children»

For example, a direct link from within the application to Myprospects.com lets users select a profile of desired customers based on demographic and geographic profiles (all two - income households with children earning above x dollars and living in y ZIP code, for instance) and download those leads as new prospects.

Not exact matches

For example, Crain said, take a household in the highest - income group with multiple people working jobs, several children to support, no assets, and live in an area with a high cost of living.

The social giant collects much more information than that, which results in at least 600 targeting options including household income, level of education, home type, home value, home ownership status, household composition, parents of children with specific ages, newly engaged couples, new vehicle buyers, expats, a variety of buyer profiles, people who frequently buy online, frequent travelers, and much more.

Also, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act does away with personal and dependent exemptions, and broadens the applicability of the child tax credit to include higher - income households.

With a pre-tax household income of $ 35,360 annually, the two - income family would still fall short of meeting basic needs for two children in every state.

Over the 20th century, average household size declined reflecting increased incomes and demographic factors, notably a lower birth rate and an increase in the share of single adult households with or without children (Graph 2).

Some of Clinton's plans include guaranteeing 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave, expanding early childhood education, capping childcare expenses at 10 percent of a household's income, helping the families of children with autism and other special needs get access to more resources and support, and insuring more families through the Affordable Care Act.

And these days, unless children from poor families get a college degree, their economic mobility is severely restricted: Young people who grow up in families in the lowest income quintile (with household income below about $ 21,500) and don't obtain a B.A. now have just a one in two chance of escaping that bottom economic bracket as adults.

Paid meals: Meals that meet the nutritional requirements of the National School Lunch or School Breakfast Program and are served to children with household income above 185 percent of the poverty line at a price set by the school district or school food program

Free meals: Meals that meet the nutritional requirements of the National School Lunch or School Breakfast Program and are served at no charge to children with household income at or below 130 percent of the poverty line

The median household income for families with two full - time working parents and at least one child under 18 at home is $ 102,400, compared with $ 84,000 for households where the father works full time and the mother works part time and $ 55,000 for households where the father works full time and the mother is not employed.

Household income has been shown to interact with child growth in Brazil.21 A US study of diarrhoeal disease found no interaction between breast feeding and household income.8 Household income, like social class, may not be a good marker of transmission risk.

Studies show that household income for women and children is more likely to drop below the poverty level immediately following a divorce, 13 declining by as much as 50 percent and causing substantial reductions in earnings capability and long - term wealth.14 Compared with children in intact families, children of divorced parents:

When deciding who gets custody of the children, courts consider a wide range of factors including household stability, relationships with the parents, and income.

At an annual cost of $ 410 million, the Family Tax Relief Rebate provides $ 350 to households with children under age 17 and annual income between $ 40,000 and $ 300,000; the Property Tax Freeze Rebate provides an amount equal to the annual increase in property taxes to homeowners earning less than $ 500,000 in tax cap - compliant local governments and school districts and costs $ 783 million annually.

This IFS research puts the Budget's regressive impact beyond doubt: the poorest will be hit more than many of the richest in cash terms let alone as a percentage; poor and middle income families with children lose out more than any other household types and the very poorest families with children lose more than any other groups — with 5 per cent of their total income being cut.

Under Golden's legislation, a student in a household with an adjusted gross income of $ 500,000 would be eligible, and that income limit would increase by $ 10,000 per additional child, not to exceed $ 550,000.

He added: «On average, children, young people and households with children each have less disposable income than working age households without children.

Among the council's 36 - page agenda is a request to expand the NYC Child Care Credit to include working households with incomes under $ 45,000 in order to match the maximum credit to the New York State credit.

That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.

He will talk of a «welfare gap» where people who grow up in a household that is dependent upon benefits assume that the state will also provide them with their own home and income — on the other side of the gap are people who save and go without before they have a home of their own or bring a child into the world;

Among families with working mothers and incomes below the poverty line — $ 18,310 for a family of three — child care absorbs nearly a third of total household budgets, according to census data.

Child poverty is currently defined by the number of children living in households with an income that falls 60 % below median earnings.

Families with a household income of more than # 50,000 to stop getting child tax credit.

The findings are especially relevant to families with children living in low - income households; these kids are at greater risk of health problems resulting from poor air quality.

More than two - thirds of asthma - induced ED visits occurred among children residing in areas with annual household income levels below $ 50,000.

Researchers found that Medicaid exposure increased hospital usage by low - income children four percent during early childhood and that Medicaid's introduction is associated with a decrease in medical debt in households that have children, freeing up resources that could be invested in kids in other ways.

«We could save a lot of money in the long run if we could give every household with children a minimum basic income where these genotypes start to become beneficial.»

Of the children, 25.9 percent were enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program; 21.7 percent were commercially insured with household incomes at or below 250 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL); and 18.2 percent had higher cost - sharing levels for all services (e.g. $ 75 or more for an emergency departmentchildren, 25.9 percent were enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program; 21.7 percent were commercially insured with household incomes at or below 250 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL); and 18.2 percent had higher cost - sharing levels for all services (e.g. $ 75 or more for an emergency departmentChildren's Health Insurance Program; 21.7 percent were commercially insured with household incomes at or below 250 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL); and 18.2 percent had higher cost - sharing levels for all services (e.g. $ 75 or more for an emergency department visit).

NCCP defines a poor household as one where incomes are below the federal poverty threshold (i.e., $ 24,036 for a family of four with two children in 2015).

NCCP defines a low - income household as one where incomes fall below 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Threshold (e.g., $ 48,016 for a family of four with two children in 2014).

While higher parental education decreases the likelihood that a child will live in a low - income or poor household, nearly half of children living in poverty (48 percent) have a parent with at least some college education.

[iii] 2011 IPUMS microdata show that 79 percent of children aged 14 - 17 are from families with less than $ 125,000 in household income (in 2016 dollars).

A modern conservative columnist, Kate O'Beirne, writing in the National Review, has questioned the value of food stamps, school breakfasts and lunches, and the WIC programs (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children): «With rates of excess weight and obesity highest among low - income households, budget officials should be asking themselves why tens of billions of dollars are being spent each year by federal nutrition programs aimed at boosting food consumption by the poor.»

«Faced with stagnating income, rising fuel bills and various household priorities, looking after their children's health and wellbeing is a daily struggle for many parents.

It found that in England, poorer children — those from families in the bottom quarter of household incomes — had less than a 10 per cent chance of attending a grammar school, compared with a 40 per cent chance among those from families in the top quarter of household incomes.

About two - thirds of the children entitled to FSMs are in the lowest - income fifth of households with children.

They constructed an index of parent characteristics by using fitted values from a regression of test scores on mother's age at child's birth, indicators for parent's 401 (k) contributions and home ownership, and an indicator for the parent's marital status interacted with a quartic in parent's household income.

Parents of students living in a household with income above the poverty level are more likely to be involved in school activities than parents of children living in a household at or below the poverty line.

For example, a household of two parents with a combined income of $ 42,643 and two children would receive vouchers worth 90 percent of the state's per - pupil funding figure (or approximately $ 4,500).

After accounting for differences in how much families earn, both districts» PTA revenues remained steady during this time period, with per - pupil PTA revenues equal to 0.06 percent of the income of the median household with children.

Montgomery County itself is a suburb directly outside Washington, D.C., where the median household income for families with children is $ 115,700.41 Montgomery County serves around 150,000 students, 35 percent of whom qualify for free and reduced - price lunch.42 Around 70 percent of students in Montgomery County are students of color.

Seattle's median property value is $ 437,000, while Portland's median property value is more than $ 100,000 less.58 Seattle's median household income for families with children is $ 103,900, around $ 27,000 more than Portland's.

Between 2012 and 2014, the revenues of Seattle's PTAs increased from approximately $ 340 to $ 370 per student, remaining relatively steady at around 0.35 percent of median household income for families with children.

During the same time period, Portland's PTA revenues increased from approximately $ 130 to $ 140 per student, remaining around 0.18 percent of median household income for families with children.

Some 5 million school - age children do not have a broadband Internet connection at home, with low - income households accounting for a disproportionate share

Students with disabilities, migrant and English learners, and those from low - income households also had rates higher than average in the state, while Asian children had the lowest rate of chronic absenteeism at 10 percent.

Only onefourth of teenagers in households with less than $ 35,000 in annual income said they had their own laptops compared with 62 percent in households with annual incomes of $ 100,000 or more, according to the report, to be published on Tuesday by Common Sense Media, a nonprofit children's advocacy and media ratings group based in San Francisco.

In this report, we examine need estimates through the lens of four different policy options for financing of out - of - school time programs: universal coverage (every child in a public school receives full or partial subsidy), subsidies for children and young people in households with incomes at 130 percent of the poverty line, subsidies for those designated as «at risk» for academic failure, and subsidies for those in households with incomes at or below the poverty line.

At the same time, there are still citizens — especially dual - income households without children who tend to populate cities, as well as those concerned with other issues — for which education policy doesn't weigh in as a deciding factor largely because they see little concrete connection between low graduation rates and the levels of crime in their communities.