A 2004 study established the positive effect of even modest increases in family
income on student test scores.
Not exact matches
In your article around Baltimore's technology gap («Computer - based
tests a challenge for low -
income students, some Baltimore teachers say,» April 22), we read that
students who took the PARCC
scored lower when they took the
test on a computer than when they used paper and pencil.
Even though almost every
student at the KIPP Academy... is from a low -
income family, and all but a few are either black or Hispanic, and most enter below grade level, they are still a step above other kids in the neighborhood;
on their math
tests in the fourth grade (the year before they arrived at KIPP), KIPP
students in the Bronx
scored well above the average for the district, and
on their fourth - grade reading
tests they often
scored above the average for the entire city.
Using
student - level data from two states, Harvard Professor Martin West and I found that 40 to 60 percent of schools serving mostly low -
income or underrepresented minority
students would fall into the bottom 15 percent of schools statewide based
on their average
test scores, but only 15 to 25 percent of these same schools would be classified as low performing based
on their
test -
score growth.
Though we do not have data
on every aspect of teachers» working conditions, we do know certain characteristics of their
students that many believe affect the teaching conditions at a school: the percentage of low -
income students at the school (as estimated by the percentage eligible for a subsidized lunch), the shares of
students who are African - American or Hispanic, average
student test scores, and class sizes.
Specifically, I separated out the effects
on test -
score gains of a
student's race and ethnicity, as well as accounted for the influence of a
student's peers, by evaluating the influence of demographic characteristics of the
student body, including average
income level and percentage of minority
students.
Student scores on language arts
tests are the single most reliable academic predictors of later
income.
Perhaps the most reasonable way to compare charters and DPS - operated schools is to analyze school
test scores and percentages of low -
income students together,
on the same scatter plot.
Florida's scholarship
students are among the most disadvantaged — the average household
income of scholarship families was only $ 24,067 this year, 4.5 percent above the poverty line — yet
on math and read
tests, they still
score near the national median among all
students from all
income ranges.
Private school vouchers have a generally positive track record in their impacts
on test scores, and evidence suggests that they can increase the educational attainment of low -
income minority
students.
To no one's surprise, that graph shows that in every country
students who come from higher -
income families
score higher
on math and reading
tests.
In addition to our main experiment
testing the ECO-C Intervention's effects
on our target group of high - achieving, low -
income students, we also used the same approach to study its effects
on students who meet the same
test -
score criteria but who have estimated family
income above the bottom one - third or attended a feeder high school.
According to a 2002 study of children in Dane County, Wisconsin, by urban - policy consultant David Rusk, low -
income children at schools with a middle - class majority
scored 20 - 32 percent higher
on standardized
tests compared with what their
scores would be at schools with a lower percentage of middle - class
students.
Our data included each
student's answers
on each year's
test; which school and classroom each
student was in; each
student's previous and future
test scores; and demographic variables including each
student's age, sex, race, and eligibility for the federal school lunch program, a widely used proxy for family
income.
The figure also shows how schools serving low -
income students are punished by accountability systems based
on average
test scores.
In the state's annual reports
on test score gains, the researcher has repeatedly taken note of the lower average
income for scholarship
students.
A decade ago, the No Child Left Behind Act ushered in an era of federally driven educational accountability focused
on narrowing the chasms between the
test scores and graduation rates of
students of different
incomes and races.
The final piece of an eight - year, $ 10 million research project
on KIPP, whose mission is to help low -
income students graduate from college, found that campuses across the nation continued to increase
test scores at every grade level over the past five years.
The recent ubiquity of standardized
test scores has provided new data
on just how poorly some schools are performing — particularly schools filled with lower -
income and minority
students, whose parents make up an important Democratic voting base.
Deasy had called for using a district - developed, value - added method of interpreting a teacher's impact
on students»
test scores, taking into account a
student's family
income and ethnicity.
In the statewide math
test, only 30 percent of low -
income students scored proficient or advanced
on...
Likewise, the average
student from a low -
income family
scores much lower
on such
tests than
students from higher -
income families.
He was a co-author of a study that showed that teachers who helped
students raise standardized
test scores had a lasting effect
on those
students» future
incomes, as well as other lifelong outcomes.
Middle School, said some instructors might be more reluctant to take
on low -
income minority
students if they are evaluated
on test scores, which do not account for poverty and other factors teachers can not control but that are known to affect learning.
In your article around Baltimore's technology gap («Computer - based
tests a challenge for low -
income students, some Baltimore teachers say,» April 22), we read that
students who took the PARCC
scored lower when they took the
test on a computer than when...
• Lincoln Elementary, a school with a large percentage of low -
income students, was flagged this year as a low - performing «focus» school under the state's new accountability system based
on state
test scores.
In the statewide math
test, only 30 percent of low -
income students scored proficient or advanced
on the
test while only 22 percent of Latino
students scored proficient or advanced.
States and districts mostly have opted to look at
student growth, as opposed to raw
test scores, because raw
scores can disadvantage teachers with large numbers of low -
income, limited - English or special needs
students, who tend to
score lower
on standardized
tests.
That measure, called Academic Growth Over Time, uses a mathematical formula to estimate how much a teacher helps
students» performance, based
on state
test scores and controlling for such outside factors as
income and race.
IMPACT was designed to control for variables like the class's
income level and English - language proficiency, and
scores teachers
on two major factors: classroom skill, as determined by multiple evaluations, and results, based
on students» improvement
on standardized
tests.
Though Brizard touts improvements in graduation rates and
test scores among his accomplishments in his 3 1/2 years, opinion is sharply divided
on whether he has made a significant difference in the performance of the district's largely low -
income black and Latino
students....
Students, who were overwhelmingly low -
income and minority, succeeded in
scoring high
on state
tests.
Narrowing the gulf
on test scores and graduation rates between low -
income students — many of whom are in the state's urban areas — and their more affluent peers has been a daunting obstacle in Connecticut for years.
In a curious choice, the «Odds» list is based
on how well a school's low -
income students score on standardized
tests but does not take into account how many low -
income students it has.
The lengthy list of school goals — including the percentage of low -
income students Braeburn hopes to be
scoring proficient
on the fast - approaching Mastery
Tests — are hung right by the door for all to see.
Like many public school districts nationwide, Mentor has a growing number of low -
income students, who tend to
score lower
on math and reading
tests.
Homeschool
students score above average
on achievement
tests regardless of their parents» level of formal education or their family's household
income.
«While some charter high schools with a large percentage of low -
income students score high
on MCAS [Massachusetts standardized
tests], these schools rank much lower
on the SATs.
A majority (59 %) also say they are very concerned that
students in lower -
income areas are less likely than other
students to be ready for college when they finish high school, and half (51 %) say they are very concerned that English Learners
score lower
on standardized
tests than other
students.
In a 2010 research review, Harvard University's Susan Eaton noted that racial segregation in schools has such a severe impact
on the
test score - gap that it outweighs the positive effects of a higher family
income for minority
students.
For example,
on the mathematics portion of the 2012 Programme for International
Student Assessment (PISA) to
test, poor
students (among those from lowest quartile in family
income), who attended schools that served the poorest families (a school in the highest quartile of those receiving free and reduced lunch), attained a mean
score of 425.
Tutoring and other support for learning, such as TRiO programs, should be more available, with particular focus
on students with low
test scores and low
incomes.
She wrote that «since teachers face pressure to improve
scores and since poverty - stricken
students generally underperform
on high - stakes
tests, schools serving low -
income students are more likely to implement a style of teaching based
on drilling and memorization that leads to little learning.»
Figure 6 plots 709 school districts in the State, based
on 1) the percentage of low -
income students in the district (the horizontal axis), and 2) the percentage of
students in the District who
scored above the 50th percentile in reading
on the 2016 PARCC
test (the vertical axis).
As expected,
scores were far lower than
on the old
tests, especially for low -
income and minority
students.
In addition to being 21 percentage points more likely to graduate high school,
students from low -
income families
scored slightly higher
on standardized
tests.
We know that special education
students or low -
income students or English language learners are going to
score lower
on tests, so their
scores are all going up,
on state
tests across time, at least
on average.
Value - added models generally use statistical methods to isolate the impact of a factor of interest (like being taught by a particular teacher)
on an outcome (like a
test score) by mathematically removing the effects of other factors (like
student family
income or prior performance levels).
This study examines the effects of private school competition
on public school
students»
test scores in the wake of Florida's Corporate Tax Credit Scholarship (FTC) program which offered scholarships to eligible low -
income students to attend private schools.
Wolf, Egalite, and Dixon used experimental methods to examine the impact of a privately - funded low - cost school voucher program
on the
test score outcomes of low -
income students in Delhi, India.