Sentences with phrase «income per capita in»

However, personal income per capita in 2016 was $ 55,987 which was 113 % of the national average.

As described by Mihalopoulos and Chatterton, 14 the WHO on Macroeconomics and Health has suggested that a general cost - effectiveness criterion should be that if the cost of a disability - adjusted life year (DALY) does not exceed the average income per capita in a given country, the treatment can be considered very cost - effective.35 In 2013, the average annual income in Sweden was approximately US$ 42 500,36 meaning that also when using the WHO's criterion, the findings of this study indicate that ICBT is cost - effective.

Connection costs were also reduced from 846 percent of income per capita in 2013/14 to 187 percent in 2015/16.

A steady increase of income per capita in developing and emerging economies has already led to a recent rapid growth in ownership and use of 2 ‐ wheelers, 3 ‐ wheelers and light duty vehicles (LDVs), together with the development of new transport infrastructure including roads, rail, airports, and ports.

If we use the Canadian data for four of the components, but use the U.S. productivity level (which is US$ 52.40 per hour worked) instead of the Canadian productivity level (which is US$ 41.50 per hour), the income per capita in 2011 is $ 44,638.

Not exact matches

Real, per capita income growth can only be sustained by increases in productivity.

The median income in Colorado is $ 31,664 and the per capita debt is $ 62,200.»

In terms of debt, Maryland residents have $ 67,020 in per - capita debt, meaning their debt - to - income ratio is 1.84.&raquIn terms of debt, Maryland residents have $ 67,020 in per - capita debt, meaning their debt - to - income ratio is 1.84.&raquin per - capita debt, meaning their debt - to - income ratio is 1.84.»

A combination of a lower per capita income and higher booze prices (a case of 24 bottles of Molson Canadian is 24 % more expensive in Newfoundland than Ontario) combine to help create the higher percentages even if volumes were exactly the same.

«Our illustrative estimate of the long term impact of reduced net migration from the EU27 on UK GDP per capita after Brexit is negative, but relatively small compared to many other uncertainties about average UK income levels in 2030,» said Hawksworth.

In nine years of full independence, the gross national product has nearly tripled — raising the average per capita income to a level exceeded in Asia only by that of JapaIn nine years of full independence, the gross national product has nearly tripled — raising the average per capita income to a level exceeded in Asia only by that of Japain Asia only by that of Japan.

Per capita income in the south has now almost caught up with that in the Midwest, and its skilled workforce continues to grow as college graduates move in.

Their study (also in Southern Economic Journal) looked at how per capita income was affected by work stoppages in the National Football League and Major League Baseball over a nearly three - decade span.

«The departure of a franchise in any sports... has never significantly lowered real per capita personal income in a metropolitan area.»

IBISWorld analysts also discuss how external factors such as Global per capita income and GDP of the BRIC nations in the Global Commercial Aircraft Manufacturing industry impact industry performance..

As Robert Blecker, an economist at American University, notes, «Contrary to the promises of the leaders who promoted it, NAFTA did not make Mexico converge to the United States in per capita income, nor did it solve Mexico's employment problems or stem the flow of migration.»

And bear in mind, China's real disposable income per capita is growing at high single - digit rates.

While growth in China is trending lower, the share of global output produced in China will continue to rise, as per capita incomes converge towards those in the more advanced economies (Graph 6).

In contrast, since 2011 there has been little net growth in real per capita incomeIn contrast, since 2011 there has been little net growth in real per capita incomein real per capita incomes.

The first is the recent slow growth in real per capita income.

As for income, Oregon's per capita personal income in 2016 was $ 45,049, 29th - highest in the U.S., according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The rise in disposable per capita income has also been weaker, inching up just 0.6 percent annually in the last five years, compared with almost 2 percent from 1993 to 2008.

To pinpoint the average retirement income you would need to live comfortably throughout the U.S., GOBankingRates looked at five factors in all 50 states and the District of Columbia: Per capita spending on groceries, healthcare, gas and fuel, housing and utilities and personal consumption expenditures not included in the four other categories.

Not exactly, but Canada's ranking on income per capita dropped from 6th position among comparator countries in 2000, to 8th in 2008, where it remained through 2012.

Canada's income per capita was US$ 36,138 in 2012 — about $ 12,000 below Norway, the top performer.

High performance in this category, either in terms of growth or the level of per capita income, does not guarantee a high quality of life.

Therefore, income per capita measures the value of good and services exchanged in the marketplace.

Therefore, improving productivity in Canada is the only sustainable way to reduce the sizable gap between Canadian and U.S. income per capita that has emerged in recent decades.

[181] Inflation - adjusted («real») per capita disposable personal income rose steadily in the U.S. from 1945 to 2008, but has since remained generally level.

In the 1970s, Canada's income per capita was almost double that of Ireland; by 2007, Ireland's income per capita exceeded Canada's by US$ 5,000 in 2007, although the gap slipped to only US$ 800 by 201In the 1970s, Canada's income per capita was almost double that of Ireland; by 2007, Ireland's income per capita exceeded Canada's by US$ 5,000 in 2007, although the gap slipped to only US$ 800 by 201in 2007, although the gap slipped to only US$ 800 by 2012.

So, in Canada's case, lower labour productivity and fewer hours worked caused Canada's income per capita to be lower than that of the United States.

To get an idea of the role each component of income per capita plays in the Canada — U.S. income gap, we used the equation shown above, substituting U.S. data for one component at a time, and keeping the country data for the other four components.

But only Norway — with with its huge oil and gas revenues — was able to convert this into higher income per capita than in the United States.

Norway ranks first in income per capita and is the only comparator country to earn an «A»; six countries receive «D» s, with France trailing the pack.

For example, to calculate what portion of the Canada-U.S. gap in income per capita is due to Canada's lower labour productivity, we substitute U.S. labour productivity into the equation but keep Canadian data for the other four components (hours worked, unemployment, labour force participation, and demographic structure).

To calculate the personal savings rate, we looked at data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) on the average income per capita for each city in the U.S..

The most important determinant of a country's per capita income, over the longer term, is the level of and growth in productivity.

The indicator is a per capita measure, because a country's total income may rise as its population increases, even though there may have been no improvement in the income level of the average citizen.

Statistics Canada has raised questions about the reliability of the measures commonly used to compare Canadian and U.S. income per capita.2 Shortcomings have been noted in the data on coverage, concept, and accuracy of hours of work.

However, even with adjustments to account for these shortcomings, productivity still contributes to a significant portion of the gap in income per capita with the United States.

India's per capita income has grown by 300 % in rupee terms in the last decade, creating an aspirational consumer of goods and services.

As of 2016, the city of Hawthorne's per - capita income was $ 21,182, with 19.2 percent of residents living in poverty — an existence whose precarity would only heighten amid an influx of young tech professionals.

Idaho has some of the lowest per capita personal income (PCPI) in the nation, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The demand for services in the Building Exterior Cleaners industry cum window cleaning line of business is on the increase in recent time, as growth in household formation rates expanded the available clientele base for industry players and rising per capita disposable income enabled consumers to purchase cleaning services they put off during the recession.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, in 2016 the Massachusetts per capita personal income (PCPI) was $ 65,137, which was second - highest in the U.S. and 131 % of the national average, at $ 49,571.

As a result, there has been very little growth in real income per capita since 2008.

If the Illinois General Assembly would simply restrict the growth of state spending to 2.89 percent (the average annual growth in Illinois» gross domestic product per capita since 2000), Illinois would be on its way to paying off its backlog of bills and eventually repealing the income tax hike.

The rate of growth in real disposable household income per capita is only 0.9 percent per year.

Although, it's worth mentioning that per capita taxes are used, albeit in much smaller sums, and that's one reason why lower income earners can end up paying a larger percentage of their income toward taxes.

If Puerto Rico were a US state — which it is not, and which is part of the problem — its per capita income would be half that of the poorest state in the nation: Mississippi.