The darker the ice sheet is, the more
incoming radiation from the sun is absorbed and the more it can melt.
Surface temperature is an imperfect gauge of whether the earth has been warmed by an imbalance between
incoming radiation from the sun, and outgoing radiation, because of the role of ocean currents in the distribution of heat between deeper and surface waters.
In terms of the cooling effect of clouds, the immediacy of feeling that effect is due to the blocked
incoming radiation from the sun, just as it would be if you stepped beneath a large shade tree.
Weather and climate on Earth are determined by the amount and distribution of
incoming radiation from the sun.
«[A] quantitative estimate of how much that gas disrupts the balance between
incoming radiation from the sun and outgoing radiation reflected from the Earth's surface.
In all of these simple models, we assume the atmosphere to have a volume as fixed as a bathtub, we assume that the atmosphere / ocean system is a closed system, we assume that
the incoming radiation from the Sun is constant, we assume no turbulence, we assume no viscosity, we assume radiative equilibrium with no feedback lag, we take no account of water vapor flux assuming it to be constant, no change in albedo from changes in land use, glacier lengthening and shortening, no volcanic eruptions, no feedbacks from vegetation.
GHGs typically don't interfere w / short - wave
incoming radiation from the sun.
Not exact matches
Climate is driven largely by energy
from the
sun, and the manner in which this
incoming solar
radiation is reflected, absorbed, transformed (as in photosynthesis), or re-radiated (as heat).
The paragraph in the OP you quote
from as well as the one above it in full are saying that the ice age cycles result
from the Earth's changing orbit round the
sun which creates changes in the «
incoming solar
radiation (insolation) at high latitudes» (Roe (2006) PDF).
I think the central point is that of the scale of energy imbalance and the timescale for response: our addition of CO2 reduces outgoing thermal
radiation, so
incoming energy
from the
sun is greater than outgoing energy to space.
Is it not also therefore true that the polar areas of least water vapor, where a greater temperature increase
from doubling of Co-2 would have the most effect, has the least W / sq - m percentage of both
incoming S - W and outgoing L - W
radiation due to the incident angle of
incoming Sun light, the high reflectivity of the snow and ice, and the greatly reduced outgoing L - W
radiation due to this?
Is it not also therefore true that the polar areas of least water vapor, where a greater temperature increase
from doubling of Co-2 would have the most effect, has the least percentage of both
incoming S - W and outgoing L - W
radiation due to the incident angle of
incoming Sun light, the high reflectivity of the snow and ice, and the greatly reduced outgoing L - W
radiation due to this?
Because the climate system derives virtually all its energy
from the
Sun, zero balance implies that, globally, the amount of
incoming solar
radiation on average must be equal to the sum of the outgoing reflected solar
radiation and the outgoing thermal infrared
radiation emitted by the climate system.
As the
incoming 168 W / m ^ 2
radiation from the
Sun is generating 324 W / m ^ 2 of greenhouse gas back -
radiation into the Earth's surface, the whole system must be self - sustaining so that, once started, the sunshine ceases to be relevant.
W, the energy
from the
sun, is the
incoming solar
radiation of 342 W / m2 less the 107 W / m2 that is reflected by the surface and the clouds.
The theory is that the Ozone Hole, by allowing more of the UV component of the
Sun's
incoming radiation to make it down to low altitude rather than being absorbed in the stratosphere is providing an incremental energy increase to drive the strength of the SAM, and thus the degree to which Antarctica is isolated
from more global weather influences.
Nice theory, but, a large part of the UHI effect is retained heat
from insolation (
incoming solar
radiation energy warming concrete etc) and, if no
sun, no warmth... which in large part happened in Dallas Ft. Worth just recently with our record snow; and we had continuing overcast afterwards too.