Obviously in the remote example of a trial judge expressly stating
an incorrect standard of proof, it will be presumed that the incorrect standard was applied.
Not exact matches
The issue arose as to whether the general commissioners had erred in applying the criminal
standard of proof to the issues
of whether there had been negligent submission
of incorrect returns and whether or not there had been understated profits.
Husband also appealed the finding that he was habitually intoxicated, claiming that the family court applied an
incorrect, prima facie,
standard as the burden
of proof.