They continue to advocate policies that increase GDP even when they do not
increase economic welfare as measured by the ISEW.
Not exact matches
Announcing his resignation (below) to the world he said: «I believe we've made great steps, with more people in work than ever before in our history, with reforms to
welfare and education,
increasing people's life chances, building a bigger and stronger society, keeping our promises to the poorest people in the world and enabling those who love each other to get married whatever their sexuality, but above all restoring Britain's
economic strength.»
In order to show that
increasing total production does not improve human
welfare, we have developed an Index of Sustainable
Economic Welfare (ISEW) for the United States.
My point is only that rough approximations to measuring
economic welfare strongly suggest that the time for viewing
increase in gross product as the appropriate goal for national policy is ended.
If it had ended, then it would seem appropriate to ask what policies are now needed if our concern is to improve
economic welfare of people rather than
increase production for its own sake.
To adopt policies designed to
increase GNP more rapidly while further lowering the sustainable
economic welfare of the nation is foolish.
In order to defeat underdevelopment, action is required not only on improving exchange - based transactions and implanting public
welfare structures, but above all on gradually
increasing openness, in a world context, to forms of
economic activity marked by quotas of gratuitousness and communion.
It would seem more rational to draw the conclusion that in the circumstances of the time,
increasing GDP was a rather ineffective way of improving
economic welfare.
Partly it has been a function of imitation, beginning in the nineteenth century with Bismarck's social
welfare programs in Germany, and partly it has been prompted by international
economic competition, again starting in the nineteenth century, with national governments playing an
increasing role in regulating and promoting all forms of
economic activity.
Are improvements in
economic welfare so connected to
increases in GNP that, despite the differences between
economic welfare and market activity, it is appropriate to continue to use GNP as a way of measuring
economic success?
It is our assumption that an
increase of disposable income of $ 1000 adds more to the
economic welfare of a family whose total income is $ 10,000 than to that of a family of equal size that takes in $ 100,000 a year.
Formed against a background of
economic curtailment on
welfare spending and a huge
increase in the number of HIV and AIDS cases, Wola Nani initiated programs to help HIV + people in the local community cope with the emotional and financial strains brought about by HIV and AIDS.
What Labour needs is a new social democratic revisionism, that heavily focuses on restructuring the
welfare state, to unite communitarian and cosmopolitan voters, in an era of globalization, high inequalities,
increased demands for choice, and an ageing population This requires applying the principles of solidarity, reciprocity and individual empowerment, in relation to reforming the
welfare state, to make it more effective at tackling poverty and providing
economic security, and to satisfy rising demands for choice.
On the one hand, the ANC have presided over 14 years of consecutive
economic growth and totally defied those who predicted collapse; electricity now reaches 80 % of the population; 65 % of five year olds are enrolled at school, and social
welfare assistance has
increased four-fold.
Cuomo also rolled back New York's estate tax, eliminated the dedicated bank tax, cut corporate taxes and has
increased economic development spending that critics on the left and right deride as corporate
welfare.
He is certain
increased production will help better the
economic welfare of farming communities and lift them out of poverty.
The fact that we have to do so lies with the
economic reality that, even in times of growth and prosperity, the previous Government
increased the
welfare bill by some 60 %, to a staggering # 200billion.
«Hard - working people have felt the impact of an
economic mess left by the last government, and do not deserve to be hit twice — having to pick up the bill for ever -
increasing welfare spending at the same time,» he wrote.
However, this cost would be offset by savings from the
welfare budget, tax receipts from newly - employed workers, and the knock - on
economic boost from such a significant
increase in production.
Increased oversight of the state's multibillion dollar
economic development program — «aka corporate
welfare.»
The high
economic and social costs of early mental illness compound as children get older; for example, adjustment disorders in childhood are associated with poor school performance and
increased reliance on social
welfare, Heinmeuller says.
He feels that HBCU leadership should consider the
increasing importance of mathematics, engineering, technology, and science to the
economic future
welfare of the African - American community.
And with the
increased social and
economic diversity, schools are finding they can not get their educational work done without paying more attention to the
welfare of their families and communities.
The program's
economic benefits in 2007 dollars exceeded costs, including
increased earnings and tax revenues, averted costs related to crime and savings for child
welfare, special education and grade retention.
This would
increase the general
economic welfare of all countries.
Climate alarm depends on several gloomy assumptions — about how fast emissions will
increase, how fast atmospheric concentrations will rise, how much global temperatures will rise, how warming will affect ice sheet dynamics and sea - level rise, how warming will affect weather patterns, how the latter will affect agriculture and other
economic activities, and how all climate change impacts will affect public health and
welfare.
In the context of high levels of poverty and malnutrition, the priority for many African countries is
increasing access to energy services and improving the
economic welfare of their people.
Increasing the cost of using energy by raising its cost will decrease its use and thus human
welfare and
economic productivity, which are strongly associated with an improved environment as humans turn to such issues as their basic needs are satisfied.
Mounting private debt claims a portion of nominal
economic growth for debt service and therefore
increased emissions that contributes only to the
welfare of the credit issuers, mostly large financial institutions or speculative traders and not to overall social
welfare or, on average, net incomes of the borrowers.
Such income redistribution would decrease the
economic welfare of the developed countries and would have an uncertain effect on the recipient countries since they would presumably be asked to give up part or all of their aspirations for further development since it is strongly dependent on
increased use of fossil fuels to
increase human productivity.
In a summary report for renewable technologies (from may 2011), the IPCC reiterated that the demand for energy and associated services to meet social and
economic development and improve human
welfare and health is
increasing and that overwhelmingly, this energy demand is met by fossil fuels.
Because utility exhibits diminishing returns to
increasing consumption,
economic damages of climate change on a richer generation will have smaller negative effects on
welfare than on a poorer generation.
One study found considerable variability in the quality of the home environments; higher - quality environments were found with families who had
increased economic resources.72 Another study also found variability in the home environments foster children experience and reported that unrelated foster parents had higher - quality home environments than kinship foster parents.73 In this same vein, foster children need caregivers who can work with child
welfare agencies to ensure that children's individual needs are met by the child
welfare system and other social institutions charged with meeting these needs.
Over the long term, the social and
economic disadvantage of this early vulnerability is evident in lower educational achievement, social disadvantage, diminished
economic returns and
increased health,
welfare and criminal justice costs.
Over the past decade trends such as minimal
increases in young family incomes, greater employment volatility, and
welfare reform initiatives have placed
economic pressure on parents to participate in the labour force, even when their children are very young.