'' The best way to
increase federal tax revenues is to increase the number of working Americans who actually pay taxes.
The government expects the anti-smoke move will
increase federal tax revenues by $ 685 million in 2014 - 15 — a major piece of the puzzle in Tory efforts to balance the books over the next two years.
Not exact matches
And all of them argue that the proposed
tax cuts, estimated to reduce
federal revenue by more than $ 1.4 trillion, won't
increase federal deficits, an assertion that's been contradicted by Congress's official
tax scorekeeper.
If firms act to reduce that
tax base in response to an
increase in the
federal rate, then provincial
revenues will fall, even if the provinces haven't changed their rates.
Eliminating the state and local
tax deduction would raise about one - quarter of the $ 4 trillion in
revenues that some Republicans say they need to prevent
tax cuts from creating a massive
increase in the
federal budget deficit.
Increased export prices also tend to boost government
revenues through company
taxes and a range of
federal and state royalties.
The proposal is about the
federal government providing funding to groups, who need assistance and paying for this additional funding by a small «
revenue neutral»
tax increase.
If you are, say, Dalton McGuinty, Jean Charest or Christy Clark, you should adamently oppose any
increases in
federal corporate
taxes since you'll bear, depending on your preferred model, some or all (and then some) of the cost of
increased federal corporate
tax revenue.
While
federal and provincial governments will continue to play an important role investing in infrastructure, they simply do not have the resources to meet the demand — pegged at somewhere in the neighbourhood of $ 500 - billion — without a large
increase in
tax revenues or drastic cuts to social programs.
However, the Liberal platform also envisaged temporary deficits to finance higher spending on social programs such as child benefits, a higher Guaranteed Income Supplement for single seniors, public health care, child care and First Nations programs, and did not
increase overall
federal tax revenues.
A 0.5 % small business
tax reduction is welcome, but overshadowed by
tax increases at the personal level, corporate level, an
increase in B.C.'s no - longer -
revenue - neutral carbon
tax, and the corresponding pending changes by the
federal government as to how small business owners can manage their affairs.
Proponents of raising
taxes on New York's wealthiest say they have a new impetus to
increase the state's
revenue — the continued bad news from Washington about deep
federal cuts to health care and other areas.
We applaud Governor Paterson's argument that, should New York receive a significant cash infusion from the
federal government for Fiscal 2010, the state should use those
revenues to cut back on significant proposed
tax and fee hikes, rather than restore or
increase governmental spending.
Some politicians want to reduce the
federal gasoline
tax, even though its fixed value per gallon means that as prices
increase,
revenues fall.
The
Federal Inland
Revenue Service (FIRS) has also begun to implement a programme of
increased awareness among Nigerians regarding the payment of
taxes.
If the graduation rate
increased to 90 percent for just one cohort of students, the country would see a $ 7.2 billion
increase in annual earnings and a $ 1.1 billion
increase in
federal tax revenue.
How much taxpayers would save in future medical, disability and other costs, and benefit in
increased tax revenues, is something
federal budgets don't tell us.
When preparing your
federal tax return using Form 1040 from the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS), you will be given an opportunity to
increase your standard deduction by checking the applicable boxes on Line 39a.
Note that since the income
tax is one of the most progressive
taxes in the
federal system, an across - the - board income
tax cut that
increases every
tax filer's after -
tax income by the same percentage would tend to make the overall
tax system less progressive, because it would collect proportionally less
revenue from one of the most progressive sources.
Assuming that Mr. McGuinty agreed to this trade, the province's highest marginal rate on personal income would rise,
federal and provincial rates combined, from 46.4 per cent to 49.4 per cent — meaning that this rate would theoretically net $ 247,000 in
revenue, a
tax increase for the top 1 per cent of at least $ 15,000.
Ottawa estimates that in 20 years, relative to the size of today's economy,
increasing the TFSA limit and not indexing the new limit to inflation will amount to 0.03 per cent of total
federal tax revenue.
The estimate is «all in,» meaning it includes the impact on the
federal and provincial governments, including the impact of foregone
tax revenues and
increased transfer payments for OAS and GIS.
Given the
tax reform effort currently under way in Congress this would seem an appropriate time to consider the usefulness of a carbon
tax to
increase Federal revenue even though no such proposal (happily) is in the current
tax bill.
Federal revenues are
increased, other
taxes which have adverse incentives can be reduced, pollution is decreased, and everyone is better off except the polluters.
Because of the somewhat precarious
Federal finances that may result from Trump's
tax, military and infrastructure enhancement proposals, and budget deficits inherited from the Obama Administration, these
increased revenues could be very crucial to the success of Trump's Administration as a whole and thus his chances for reelection in 2020.
[75] The American Chemistry Council determined that a 25 %
increase in the supply of ethane (a liquid derived from shale gas) could add over 400,000 jobs across the economy, provide over $ 4.4 billion annually in
federal, state, and local
tax revenue, and spur $ 16.2 billion in capital investment by the chemical industry.
Likewise, 60 percent of Americans support a $ 10 per ton carbon
tax if the
revenue were used to reduce
federal income
taxes, even when told this would «slightly
increase the cost of many things you buy, including food, clothing, and electricity.»
Boosting
federal revenues has also been necessary at times, and many presidents have
increased the
tax rates on both individuals and corporations to achieve national fiscal goals.
The U.S.
federal government didn't begin to approach its modern scale of activity until the New Deal following the Great Depression in the 1930s, which was financed with very high income
taxes and estate
taxes, high customs duties such as the Smooth - Hawley tariffs imposed not long after the crash of 1929 (which were so high that they reduced customs
revenue rather than
increasing it), and newly imposed payroll
taxes.
The Senate Budget Committee approved the bill on a party - line vote of 12 - 11 Tuesday, but only after Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee said he bargained for adding a controversial provision: a so - called
revenue trigger that would impose
tax increases if the
tax bill's cuts raise the
federal deficit.
Suburban REALTORS Alliance Position The Alliance is opposed to
increases in the current transfer
tax for the following reasons: 1) As the transfer
tax is levied only on buyers and sellers of property, the burden per taxpayer is greater than the burden from a more broad - based
tax designed to generate the same amount of
revenue; 2) Since public transportation is a benefit that is open to all members of society, the charge should not be placed solely on buyers and sellers of property; 3) The transfer
tax adds additional burdens on first - time home buyers saving for a down - payment and covering the closing costs and runs contrary to existing
federal, state, and local programs including the mortgage interest deduction, low interest property maintenance loans, and grants to first time homebuyers; 4) A real estate transfer
tax is a state and local
tax assessed on real property when ownership of the property is exchanged between parties.
Increased scrutiny around
federal tax policies and pressure to find new sources of
revenue could cause Congress to repeal or limit the use of Section 1031 (also referred to as the Like - Kind Exchange).
According to a roundup by the Committee for a Responsible
Federal Budget, analyses from the
Tax Policy Center, Penn - Wharton Budget Model, and
Tax Foundation all determine that the TCJA would add more than $ 1 trillion to the deficit — even when
increased revenue from economic growth is added.
This transactional activity raises state, local and
federal tax revenue through transfer, sales and use
taxes and
increased property
taxes.