Warming air and ocean temperatures
increase glacier ice melt.
Not exact matches
Trump's stance on the environment contradicts thousands of scientists and decades of research, which has linked many observable changes in climate, including rising air and ocean temperatures, shrinking
glaciers, and widespread melting of snow and
ice, to an
increase in greenhouse gas emissions from human activities.
The second cause of sea level
increase is the melting of land
ice — such as
glaciers and
ice sheets.
Increased atmospheric heat obviously makes temperatures warmer, which leaves less time for
ice to form and solidify and create new layers on
glaciers and
ice sheets.
Some
glaciers on the perimeter of West Antarctica are receiving
increased heat from deep, warm ocean currents, which melt
ice from the grounding line, releasing the brake and causing the
glaciers to flow and shed icebergs into the ocean more quickly.
Now, warming seawater intruding underneath has loosened the
glaciers» grip on bedrock, speeding their flow toward the sea and causing
increasing amounts of
ice to break off into the ocean.
The
glacier is currently experiencing significant acceleration, thinning and retreat that is thought to be caused by «ocean - driven» melting; an
increase in warm ocean water finding its way under the
ice shelf.
Temperature versatility is important because
increasing evidence documents dynamic and often unpredicted behavior of
ice that could affect environmental conditions — as with
glaciers on earth, for example — and explain the evolution of satellites» bodies in space, as with Jupiter's moon Europa and Saturn's Enceladus.
Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects: rapidly melting
glaciers, destabilization of major
ice sheets,
increases in extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts in species ranges, and more.
So when wind pulls warm water up from down deep, the temperature difference experienced at the interface of the water and
ice can effectively submerse the
glacier in a hot bath, with some areas experiencing more than a 10-fold
increase in melt rate.
The results now published in Environmental Research Letters seem to contradict the data from a satellite mission based on other measuring methods, which indicates a slight
increase in mass in the
glacier ice for an almost identical period of time.
However, most of the Antarctic
glaciers are on land, and rapidly adding new
ice shelf material to the floating mass will
increase sea level rise.
Mouginot et al. report that between 2002 and 2014, the area covered by the
glacier's
ice shelf shrank by 95 %; since 1999, the
glacier's flow rate has nearly doubled; and its acceleration
increased threefold in the fall of 2012.
«If
ice caps and
glaciers were to continue to crack and break into pieces, [the amount of] their surface area that is exposed to air would be significantly
increased, which could lead to accelerated melting and much - reduced coverage area on the Earth,» Buehler said in a statement.
By 1900,
increased emissions of soot could have triggered the loss of more than 15 m of
ice from a
glacier's surface; by 1930, the loss could have totaled 30 m or more — magnitudes and timing that can easily account for the Alpine glacial retreat, the scientists contend.
The system is helping scientists understand how quickly
glaciers and
ice sheets will melt, and how fast oceans will rise, as temperatures
increase
As global temperatures continue to
increase, the hastening rise of those seas as
glaciers and
ice sheets melt threatens the very existence of the small island nation, Kiribati, whose corals offered up these vital clues from the warming past — and of an even hotter future, shortly after the next change in the winds.
These findings suggest that Greenland's
glaciers have been experiencing
increasing ice loss for at least three decades — a result that may reinforce scientists» concerns over the stability of the melting
ice sheet.
But that could soon change, Rignot said, because the rate at which
ice sheets are losing mass is
increasing three times faster than the rate of
ice loss from mountain
glaciers and
ice caps.
It is also not influencing
increased ocean heat content, melting
ice caps and
glaciers, satellites showing tropospheric warming or strato cooling, etc
Analysis of the data showed that despite isolated cases where
ice volume and thickness increased, none of the advancing glaciers have come close to the maximums achieved during the so - called «Little Ice Age» — a period of cooling between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centu
ice volume and thickness
increased, none of the advancing
glaciers have come close to the maximums achieved during the so - called «Little
Ice Age» — a period of cooling between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centu
Ice Age» — a period of cooling between the sixteenth and the nineteenth century.
A 1 °C
increase in temperature, applied uniformly across a
glacier, is enough to melt a vertical meter of
ice each year.
While the Alps could lose anything between 75 percent and 90 percent of their glacial
ice by the end of the century, Greenland's
glaciers — which have the potential to raise global sea levels by up to 20 feet — are expected to melt faster as their exposure to warm ocean water
increases.
Additionally, it is postulated that the warming climate will likely extend melt seasons, leading to
increases in biological activity and thus contributing further to the darkening of
glaciers and
ice sheets (Benning et al., 2014).
Reinhard was awarded for his work in investigating how the potential disintegration of Antarctic floating
ice shelves could contribute to
increased ice flow from inland
glaciers, and a resulting rise in global sea levels.
Major
increases would have to be fuelled by a faster flow of
glaciers on the Greenland or Antarctic
ice sheets.
Drews was awarded for his work in investigating how the potential disintegration of Antarctic floating
ice shelves could contribute to
increased ice flow from inland
glaciers, and a resulting rise in global sea levels [5].
Thousands of studies conducted by researchers around the world have documented changes in surface, atmospheric, and oceanic temperatures; melting
glaciers; diminishing snow cover; shrinking sea
ice; rising sea levels; ocean acidification; and
increasing atmospheric water vapor.
Since IPCC (2001) the cryosphere has undergone significant changes, such as the substantial retreat of arctic sea
ice, especially in summer; the continued shrinking of mountain
glaciers; the decrease in the extent of snow cover and seasonally frozen ground, particularly in spring; the earlier breakup of river and lake
ice; and widespread thinning of antarctic
ice shelves along the Amundsen Sea coast, indicating
increased basal melting due to
increased ocean heat fluxes in the cavities below the
ice shelves.
Worldwide, small
ice caps and
glaciers have reacted particularly dynamically to worldwide
increases in temperatures9 - 11, and it has been proposed that the volume loss from mountain
glaciers and
ice caps like these is the main contributor to recent global sea - level rise12.
As a general matter, yes, but AIUI the
increasing height (depth) of the
ice face is the key factor for accelerating retreat of these
glaciers since it creates more surface area for the warm water to work on.
Acceleration of melting of
ice - sheets,
glaciers and
ice - caps: A wide array of satellite and
ice measurements now demonstrate beyond doubt that both the Greenland and Antarctic
ice - sheets are losing mass at an
increasing rate.
The
ice stream is steepening, which
increases the gravitational driving stress, helping it to flow faster, and there is no indication that the
glacier is approaching a steady state10.
Numerical computer modelling of the
glacier for these different time periods will help us understand whether this part of the
ice sheet is susceptible to rising sea level, warming oceans or
increased atmospheric temperatures.
And it's also important to remember that, while sea
ice is
increasing in Antarctica,
glaciers and
ice shelves are all melting rapidly, producing large volumes of fresh water.
Which leads me to another question — the melting glacial / Greenland / Antarctic
ice water is depleted in CO2 (check out the bubbles in your
ice cubes)-- how much additional CO2 is being sequestered by this runoff into the oceans, and what happens to CO2
increase when we run out of
glaciers?
If you believe that it is not warming then please explain the melting of
glaciers, loss of sea
ice, longer growing seasons, migration of species,
increased humidity, and sea level rise.
would a plausible physical explanation be that the deep ocean and
ice sheets are still responding somewhat to the post-glacial temperature
increase (eg, T - T0, 0 > 0), but that the faster components of SLR like the surface oceans and
glaciers were actually responding to the decrease in temperature since the early Holocene?
Even if
increased precipitation would thicken the
ice - sheet at its middle, the speeding up of the output
glaciers would dump more freshwater into the North Atlantic.
There is of course a lot of uncertainty about the details, that affect the melt rates, we just don't know how quickly warmer seawater will undercut floating
glaciers, and buildup of darker older snow /
ice layers will
increase the amount of absorbed sun light.
Other factors would include: — albedo shifts (both from
ice > water, and from
increased biological activity, and from edge melt revealing more land, and from more old dust coming to the surface...); — direct effect of CO2 on
ice (the former weakens the latter); —
increasing, and increasingly warm, rain fall on
ice; — «stuck» weather systems bringing more and more warm tropical air ever further toward the poles; — melting of sea
ice shelf
increasing mobility of
glaciers; — sea water getting under parts of the
ice sheets where the base is below sea level; — melt water lubricating the
ice sheet base; — changes in ocean currents -LRB-?)
That would also imply that (T - T0 (t)-RRB- must be negative during the pre-900 period when SLR = 0... would a plausible physical explanation be that the deep ocean and
ice sheets are still responding somewhat to the post-glacial temperature
increase (eg, T - T0, 0 > 0), but that the faster components of SLR like the surface oceans and
glaciers were actually responding to the decrease in temperature since the early Holocene?
To give another, more specific example, at a typical
glacier on Mt. Baker, in Washington State, a summer temperature
increase of 1 °C translates to a ~ 150 m
increase in the altitude of the equilibrium line (the point where annual
ice accumulation = annual loss), and a resulting ~ 2 km retreat of the
glacier terminus.
Geoengineering proposals fall into at least three broad categories: 1) managing atmospheric greenhouse gases (e.g., ocean fertilization and atmospheric carbon capture and sequestration), 2) cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight (e.g., putting reflective particles into the atmosphere, putting mirrors in space to reflect the sun's energy,
increasing surface reflectivity and altering the amount or characteristics of clouds), and 3) moderating specific impacts of global warming (e.g., efforts to limit sea level rise by
increasing land storage of water, protecting
ice sheets or artificially enhancing mountain
glaciers).
Under all RCP scenarios the rate of sea level rise will very likely exceed that observed during 1971 — 2010 due to
increased ocean warming and
increased loss of mass from
glaciers and
ice sheets.
Alastair notes that
increased water vapour will carry more energy to the surface of the
glaciers, likewise these
increased water flows over, through and under the
glaciers is also transferring vast amounts of energy into the
ice.
Its effects were relatively modest: perhaps 1 Celsius degree of cooling (1.8 F), a fall in sea level of approximately 30 centimeters (1 foot), and marginal
increases in sea
ice and terrestrial
glaciers as well as descents in European montane «snow lines» of perhaps 100 meters.
These include
increases in heavy downpours, rising temperature and sea level, rapidly retreating
glaciers, thawing permafrost, lengthening growing seasons, lengthening
ice - free seasons in the ocean and on lakes and rivers, earlier snowmelt, and alterations in river flows.
Here are some possible choices — in order of
increasing sophistication: * All (or most) scientists agree (the principal Gore argument) * The 20th century is the warmest in 1000 years (the «hockeystick» argument) *
Glaciers are melting, sea
ice is shrinking, polar bears are in danger, etc * Correlation — both CO2 and temperature are
increasing * Sea levels are rising * Models using both natural and human forcing accurately reproduce the detailed behavior of 20th century global temperature * Modeled and observed PATTERNS of temperature trends («fingerprints») of the past 30 years agree
Glaciers and
ice caps in Arctic Canada are continuing to lose mass at a rate that has been
increasing since 1987, reflecting a trend towards warmer summer air temperatures and longer melt seasons.