The scientists show that the observed increase in unprecedented heavy rainfall generally fits with this thermodynamically expected
increase under global warming.
report that ocean sediment cores containing an «undisturbed history of the past» have been analyzed for variations in PP over timescales that include the Little Ice Age... they determined that during the LIA the ocean off Peru had «low PP, diatoms and fish,» but that «at the end of the LIA, this condition changed abruptly to the low subsurface oxygen, eutrophic upwelling ecosystem that today produces more fish than any region of the world's oceans... write that «in coastal environments, PP, diatoms and fish and their associated predators are predicted to decrease and the microbial food web to
increase under global warming scenarios,» citing Ito et al..
Climate projections indicate that the likelihood of more severe droughts, such as the one we're observing,
increases under global warming.
Not exact matches
Under current policies, the IEA puts the chances of holding
global temperature
increases to less than 2 degrees — the threshold at which
global warming tips us into the danger zone — at a scant 2 percent.
Although average summer storm activity decreases, the most intense winter storms are projected to
increase in frequency
under continued
global warming.
Dr Li said the latest research findings give a better understanding of changes in human - perceived equivalent temperature, and indicate
global warming has stronger long - term impacts on human beings
under both extreme and non-extreme weather conditions, suggesting that climate change adaptation can not just focus on heat wave events, but should be extended to the whole range of effects of temperature
increases.
«
Increasing Water Cycle Extremes in California and Relation to ENSO Cycle
under Global Warming.»
Temperature extremes over these years is basically in line with what is expected
under global warming - an
increase in extremely
warm episodes and a decline in extremely cold ones.
Here's an interesting paper that is referenced in some of the listed publications: Meraner et al. 2013, Robust
increase in equilibrium climate sensitivity
under global warming, GRL https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01099395/document
What I'm confused about is that I'm
under the assumption that the rate of
global warming is
increasing at a faster rate but Jones figures indicate they've been pretty even.
Do you know that Goldenberg and yourself are the two scientific witnesses cited by the german news magazine Der Spiegel yesterday
under the headline that the
increase in hurricane activity «has nothing to do with
global warming»?
The authors commented, «These findings are in tune with model projections and some observations that indicate an
increase in heavy rain events and a decrease in weak events
under global warming scenarios.»
If one wants to make the connection to
global warming for this glacier, one will need to proof that ocean temperatures
under the ice have
increased.
«We also present a set of
global vulnerability drivers that are known with high confidence: (1) droughts eventually occur everywhere; (2)
warming produces hotter droughts; (3) atmospheric moisture demand
increases nonlinearly with temperature during drought; (4) mortality can occur faster in hotter drought, consistent with fundamental physiology; (5) shorter droughts occur more frequently than longer droughts and can become lethal
under warming,
increasing the frequency of lethal drought nonlinearly; and (6) mortality happens rapidly relative to growth intervals needed for forest recovery.
Or, trying to «correct» for the different lifetimes of the gases using
Global Warming Potentials, over a 100 - year time horizon (which still way
under - represents the lifetime of the CO2), you get that the methane would be equivalent to
increasing CO2 to about 500 ppm, lower than 750 because the CO2 forcing lasts longer than the methane, which the GWP calculation tries in its own myopic way to account for.
Increasing water cycle extremes in California and relation to ENSO cycle
under global warming (Nature Communications)
«
Increased Record - Breaking Precipitation Events
under Global Warming.»
Dai, A., 2012:
Increasing drought
under global warming in observations and models.
These methods have been significantly improved by fully coupling the hydrologic cycle among land, lake, and atmosphere.94, 95 Without accounting for that cycle of interactions, a study96 concluded that
increases in precipitation would be negated by
increases in winter evaporation from less ice cover and by
increases in summer evaporation and evapotranspiration from
warmer air temperatures,
under a scenario of continued
increases in
global emissions (SRES A2 scenario).
The new work goes well beyond an increasingly dated consensus finding of the international scientific community on sea level, which stated that it could
increase by nearly 1 meter by the year 2100,
under a worst - case scenario version of
global warming.
See Johanson & Fu (2009) Hadley Cell Widening: Model Simulations versus Observations and Dai (2012)
Increasing drought
under global warming in observations and models.
In the past few months, climate scientists speaking out about the dangers of
global warming have come
under increased assault, largely because of climate skeptics voicing concerns over the information contained within certain scientists» email messages.
Even a combination of approaches could not stop
global warming increasing by a lot more than 2 °C by 2100
under the notorious «business as usual» scenario.
In other words,
under solar or anthropogenic influence the changes in mean climate values, such as the
global temperature, are less important than
increased duration of certain climate patterns associated say with cold conditions in some regions and
warm conditions in the other regions
Importantly, these trends can largely be explained by
increases in mean ocean temperatures, suggesting that we can expect further
increases in marine heatwave days
under continued
global warming.»
A new report looks at flood risk and economic damages
under different
global warming scenarios with temperature
increases of 1.5, 2 and 4 °C.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1)
Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will
warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant
increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5)
global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The
global average temperature
under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
I read often a Science Daily News
under the
Global Warming section where often I find interesting studies and articles on AGW subjects, but sometimes articles appear that really reach to blame things on AGW like some guy carrying a bowl of cereal across his living room accidently slips his big toe under a loop in his carpet, trips falls, spills his cereal, falls over a piece of furniture and exhales a abnormally large amount of CO2 followed by a burst of expletives (more CO2) leading to increased warming in his neighb
Warming section where often I find interesting studies and articles on AGW subjects, but sometimes articles appear that really reach to blame things on AGW like some guy carrying a bowl of cereal across his living room accidently slips his big toe
under a loop in his carpet, trips falls, spills his cereal, falls over a piece of furniture and exhales a abnormally large amount of CO2 followed by a burst of expletives (more CO2) leading to
increased warming in his neighb
warming in his neighborhood.
Under those conditions, the spread of fires in the boreal forests of Eurasia would greatly
increase once such a fire is started.23 If
global warming continues at its current pace, the annual fire season in these boreal forests are likely to start earlier and end later, and become more severe.5, 7,6,15
according to paper 1, the paper by Ramanathan entitled «Trace - Gas Greenhouse Effect and
Global Warming», the author states on page 3 (which is really labeled page 189 since it was in a larger journal i guess)
under the section Anthropogenic Enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect — «an
increase in greenhouse gas such as CO2 will lead to a further reduction in OLR.»
How much has NASA's GISS climate research unit
increased global warming under the Obama administration?
Last year was the hottest since records began and with an El Nino now
under way the
warm surface waters of the Pacific are releasing heat into the atmosphere with the result 2015 is likely to break last year's record and the
global average surface temperature could jump by as much as 0.1 degree this year alone bring
global surface temperatures
increases to 1 degrees or half way to the UN
global limit.
via: Science Codex Ocean Dead Zones Ocean «Dead Zones»
Increasing: 400 Oxygen - Deprived Areas Now Exist Tropical Dead Zones Set to Expand by 50 %
Under Climate Change Corn Ethanol Worsens Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone A Primer of
Global Warming - Caused Marine Dead Zones
There are also indications that the» hiatus» is related to
increased warming in the deep oceans (Balmaseda et al. 2013) and that the estimate of the
global mean has been underestimated due
under - reporting of the recent
warming in the Arctic (Cowtan and Way 2014).
In order to separate the simulations into those that
warm faster and those that
warm slower
under a given forcing, we used an
increase in
global mean temperature of 4 °C relative to preindustrial as an indicator.
As expected, we found that at mid - and high latitudes, projected
warming will reduce the number of days below freezing, resulting in more suitable growing days (the average
global number of days above freezing will
increase by 2 %, 5 %, and 7 %
under RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5, respectively; Fig 2A, S5A — S5D Fig, S6A — S6C Fig)[35].
More on Marine Dead Zones Ocean» Dead Zones»
Increasing: 400 Oxygen - Deprived Areas Now Exist Tropical Dead Zones Set to Expand by 50 Percent
Under Climate A Primer on
Global Warming - Caused Marine Dead Zones