Ice sheet albedo forcing is estimated to have caused a global mean forcing of about — 3.2 W m — 2 (based on a range of several LGM simulations) and radiative forcing from
increased atmospheric aerosols (primarily dust and vegetation) is estimated to have been about — 1 W m — 2 each.
Not exact matches
Black carbon
aerosols — particles of carbon that rise into the atmosphere when biomass, agricultural waste, and fossil fuels are burned in an incomplete way — are important for understanding climate change, as they absorb sunlight, leading to higher
atmospheric temperatures, and can also coat Arctic snow with a darker layer, reducing its reflectivity and leading to
increased melting.
Reduction of the amount of
atmospheric CH4 and related gases is needed to counterbalance expected forcing from
increasing N2O and decreasing sulfate
aerosols.
The important point here is that a small external forcing (orbital for ice - ages, or GHG plus
aerosols & land use changes in the modern context) can be strongly amplified by the positive feedback mechanism (the strongest and quickest is
atmospheric water vapor - a strong GHG, and has already been observed to
increase.
Considering also that Northern Hemispheric cooling in 1940 — 70 is attributable to the «global dimming» effect of
increasing sulfate
aerosols, the sulfate cooling effect is, again, felt more strongly in Greenland, and indirectly via altered
atmospheric dynamics not via local radiation budget modification.
In all cases, the warming from
increasing greenhouse gases significantly exceeds any cooling from
atmospheric aerosols.
Basic physical science considerations, exploratory climate modeling, and the impacts of volcanic
aerosols on climate all suggest that SWCE could partially compensate for some effects — particularly net global warming — of
increased atmospheric CO2.
However, I am not a «warmista» by any means — we do not know how to properly quantify the albedo of
aerosols, including clouds, with their consequent negative feedback effects in any of the climate sensitivity models as yet — and all models in the ensemble used by the «warmistas» are indicating the sensitivities (to
atmospheric CO2
increase) are too high, by factors ranging from 2 to 4: which could indicate that climate sensitivity to a doubling of current CO2 concentrations will be of the order of 1 degree C or less outside the equatorial regions (none or very little in the equatorial regions)- i.e. an outcome which will likely be beneficial to all of us.
During the ~ 63 year period (1930 to 1992) cooling prevailed that can be attributed partially to an
increases in
atmospheric aerosols that reduce surface insolation.
Here we find a long list of climate components that «are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the
increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and
aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century.»
The prominent upward trend in the GM precipitation occurring in the last century and the notable strengthening of the global monsoon in the last 30 yr (1961 — 90) appear unprecedented and are due possibly in part to the
increase of
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, though the authors» simulations of the effects from recent warming may be overestimated without considering the negative feedbacks from
aerosols.
Increased biomass can lead to increased emissions of biogases such as dimethyl sulfide and isoprene, which when oxidized in the atmospheric form sulphate and organic aerosols that can nucleate clouds, increasing cloud cover and planetary albedo — the CLAW Hy
Increased biomass can lead to
increased emissions of biogases such as dimethyl sulfide and isoprene, which when oxidized in the atmospheric form sulphate and organic aerosols that can nucleate clouds, increasing cloud cover and planetary albedo — the CLAW Hy
increased emissions of biogases such as dimethyl sulfide and isoprene, which when oxidized in the
atmospheric form sulphate and organic
aerosols that can nucleate clouds,
increasing cloud cover and planetary albedo — the CLAW Hypothesis.
In particular, I think it would be interesting to use a complex
atmospheric chemistry component to allow for spatial variation in the forcing reduction through sulphate
aerosols:
increase the
aerosol optical depth over one source country, for example, and let it disperse over time.
Similarly,
atmospheric aerosols, generally human - caused, can
increase albedo and cool the planet — especially if they also
increase cloudiness by providing condensation nuclei for WV.
Reduction of the amount of
atmospheric CH4 and related gases is needed to counterbalance expected forcing from
increasing N2O and decreasing sulfate
aerosols.
Dennie: I am slowly coming to the realization that the planet is heating up not only from greenhouse gasses and
aerosol particulates holding in heat, but that the major cause of the
increased atmospheric heat is due to microwave technology and the exponential
increase in its saturation of the entire global atmosphere.
«Reducing the wide range of uncertainty inherent in current model predictions of global climate change will require major advances in understanding and modeling of both (1) the factors that determine
atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and
aerosols, and (2) the so - called «feedbacks» that determine the sensitivity of the climate system to a prescribed
increase in greenhouse gases.»
a) decreases («dimming») until the 1980s, because
atmospheric pollutants (
aerosols) make the atmosphere more reflective and also clouds, by
increasing the number of water droplets in the clouds, which in turn
increases the amount of sunlight reflected, and subsequent
This is as to be expected, since continued efforts to reduce
atmospheric aerosols in the West have resulted in less dimming (more warming), while in the East
increasing pollution has caused more dimming (less warming).
The latter effect acts to reduce CO2 sensitivity by
increasing the aerosol - sensitive SW tau, increasing both cloud density and cover, decreasing upper tropospheric specific humidity and INCREASING SW albedo and will increasingly do so as the atmospheric level of
increasing the
aerosol - sensitive SW tau,
increasing both cloud density and cover, decreasing upper tropospheric specific humidity and INCREASING SW albedo and will increasingly do so as the atmospheric level of
increasing both cloud density and cover, decreasing upper tropospheric specific humidity and
INCREASING SW albedo and will increasingly do so as the atmospheric level of
INCREASING SW albedo and will increasingly do so as the
atmospheric level of CO2 rises!
What was intended, I guess, is that CO2
increase by itself would have produced more warming than was observed, but that
atmospheric aerosols reduced the warming below what would have been due to CO2 alone.
Scientific term ##### Public meaning ##### Better choice enhance ######### improve ########## intensify,
increase aerosol ########## spray can ######### tiny
atmospheric particle positive trend ####### good trend ####### upward trend positive feedback ##### good response, praise ##### vicious cycle, self - reinforcing cycle
The latter effect acts to reduce CO2 sensitivity by
increasing the
aerosol - sensitive SW tau,
increasing both cloud density and cover, decreasing upper tropospheric specific humidity and SW albedo and will increasingly do so as the
atmospheric level of CO2 rises!
Models suggest
atmospheric aerosol concentrations will
increase as the temperatures keep climbing — and that's bad news for your lungs.
enhance improve, intensify
increase aerosol spray can tiny
atmospheric particle positive trend good trend upward trend positive feedback good response, praise vicious cycle, self - reinforcing cycle
The only direct real - world inputs to these models, in a climate change simulation context, are changes in
atmospheric chemistry and composition (such as
increasing greenhouse gases, or changing volcanic
aerosols) and changes in solar radiation.
Brenty - The
increased level of
atmospheric sulfate
aerosols from tropical volcanoes over the last decade, blocked sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, which has contributed to a very slight reduction in warming.
Read more: Stanford University
Aerosols Also Implicated in Glacier Melting, Changing Weather Patterns Other research examining the effects of soot on melting glaciers and changing weather pattens in South Asia has reached similar conclusions: Beyond
increasing atmospheric warming, because the soot coats the surface of the snow and ice it changes the albedo of the surface, allowing it to absorb more sunlight and thereby accelerating melting.
There have been numerous research papers and reviews published over the past 10 years, including several in prestigious journals such as Nature and Science, that conclude that the observed temperature changes over the past 100 years are consistent with the combined changes in
atmospheric aerosols (volcanic and anthropogenic), land surface changes, variations in solar irradiance and
increases in greenhouse gases.
The identification of other, sometimes more powerful, greenhouse gases such as methane, the contributions to
atmospheric carbon dioxide from other human activities such as deforestation and cement manufacture, better understanding of the temperature - changing properties of
atmospheric pollution such as sulphur emissions,
aerosols and their importance in the post-1940s northern hemisphere cooling: the knowledge - base was
increasing year by year.
The 2007 Fourth Assessment Report compiled by the IPCC (AR4) noted that «changes in
atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and
aerosols, land cover and solar radiation alter the energy balance of the climate system», and concluded that «
increases in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations is very likely to have caused most of the
increases in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century».
We find that the
increase in emissions of inorganic
aerosol precursors is much larger than the corresponding
aerosol increase, reflecting a non-linear
atmospheric response.