The second profound social change is that we are now living in a nuclear age compounded by
increasing international tensions, violence, terrorism, and the stockpiling of nuclear weapons.
Not exact matches
CNBC contributor John Rutledge and Leland Miller, China Biege Book
International, weigh in on
increasing China - U.S.
tensions and how it may impact the markets.
They tend to damage the economies of all countries involved, raising
tensions and
increasing the risk of
international conflict.
The U.S. Commission on
International Religious Freedom, for example, noted in its 2015 annual report the
increase in reports of violence in India in recent years and observed that a «climate of impunity» against wrongdoers appeared to exist in a number of Indian states, «exacerbating the social and religious
tensions among communities.»
If one asks, what are the possible roads to a world without war, that essential way - station on the way to freedom of information in anecologically organized world, Arthur Waskow answers that there are five: (a) Control of the nation - state system through stabilizing the balance of power and reducing
international tensions but keeping the weapons; (b) Reform of the system through total disarmament without abandoning national sovereignty or the pursuit of national interest; (c) Extension of the system through the creation of a federal world government; (d) Fragmentation of the system through
increases in the power of extra-national associations and Institutions across national boundaries, and corresponding decreases in state power as these occupational, industrial, scientific, and other groups gradually expropriate from the national governments the power to make decisions within their own fields; and (e) Abolition of the system through substituting love f or coercion.20.»
The third factor
increasing tension is the presence of two political candidates due to begin trial at the
International Criminal Court (ICC) in the month following the election.
However the institution of the following policy changes can reduce both inter-state
tensions and the associated recurring costs: a concerted effort to
increase transparency in each nation's territorial claims; a US declaration on the status of disputed territory conflicts in its mutual defence treaties; and internal enforcement of
international agreements such as the Code of Conduct.
One way to achieve this is to limit public appearances, especially during times of national or
international tension when the number of potential assailants
increases.
Deepening interconnection between energy networks and deepening
international cooperation in energy trade will
increase efficiency, lower energy market volatility, reduce geopolitical
tension.
It might help hold down
international tensions a bit, during an era of what I expect will be
increasing food insecurity and climate migration.
While Joan Biskupic at CNN, writes that Jesner is evidence of
increasing tension between the liberal and conservative blocs on the Court, Walter Olson, at the Cato Institute, argues that the decision «[confirms] that is it up to Congress, not the judiciary, to decide whether and when American courts should entertain
international human rights cases against foreign defendants.»