The law is now clear that a former employee can base a claim for
an increased punitive damage award on their employer's systemic bad faith policies or practices in the manner in which it treats its employees.
A claim for
an increased punitive damage award based on systemic wrongdoing may strike some lawyers as dubious on the basis that a plaintiff should not be able to claim damages for the harm done to others.
The availability of
an increased punitive damage award in a wrongful dismissal action because of a bad faith employer policy was recognized in Hodson v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.2 The Divisional Court considered an appeal of an order striking paragraphs in the plaintiff's statement of claim that alleged that the Bank had an ongoing corporate strategy of terminating employees for cause to avoid having to provide unwanted employees with a severance package.
On appeal14 the Ontario Court of Appeal
increased the punitive damage award to $ 50,000.
Permits a court to
increase a punitive damages award to three times an award for compensatory damages if misbehavior continues during trial.
Not exact matches
Further, in any such dispute, under no circumstances will participant be permitted to obtain
awards for, and hereby waives all rights to claim
punitive, incidental, or consequential
damages, including reasonable attorneys» fees, other than participant's actual out - of - pocket expenses (i.e. costs associated with entering this Giveaway), and participant further waives all rights to have
damages multiplied or
increased.
It
increased the amount of aggravated
damages awarded while somewhat decreasing the original amount of common law notice, and
increased the amount of
punitive damages.
Thus, the
increase in total
damages awards can not be attributed to an
increase in
punitive damages.
The Court also raised the bar as to the amount of
punitive damages to be
awarded in such cases, and signalled significantly
increased exposure for employers found to engage in such misconduct.
It may also be grounds to seek
punitive damages, which could greatly
increase the
damage award for plaintiffs.
They think that many
punitive damages are being
awarded, which in turn lead to
increased insurance rates.
In a drunk driving case, victims can pursue
punitive damages — a money
award intended to punish the wrongdoer that can significantly
increase the total compensation to the victim.
The concern, perhaps, is that jurors» knowledge that the lion's share of
punitive damages will go to the state will cause the size of those
awards to
increase in, for example, «bad faith» suits against insurers.
Requires a judge to review all
punitive damages awards and to issue an opinion on his decision to
increase or decrease an
award, or to let it stand.
Disputes and Governing Law: Except where prohibited, entrant agrees that: (1) any and all disputes, claims and causes of action arising out of or connected with this Contest or any prize
awarded shall be resolved individually, without resort to any form of class action, and exclusively by a federal or state court located in the province of Alberta any and all claims, judgments and
awards shall be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs incurred, including costs associated with entering this Contest, but in no event attorneys» fees; and (3) under no circumstances will entrant be permitted to obtain
awards for, and entrant hereby waives all rights to claim, indirect,
punitive, incidental and consequential
damages and any other
damages, other than for actual out - of - pocket expenses, and any and all rights to have
damages multiplied or otherwise
increased.