It may seem unrelated to some industry watchers, but the fact that consumers still prefer and buy more print than digital actually speaks to
the increased validity of data about how self - published authors are faring in the market.
Not exact matches
Several
of the studies summarized in this section included detailed descriptions
of data collection strategies and triangulated information from multiple sources
of data,
increasing the confidence in the
validity of these findings (Feldman and Tung, 2002; Heller & Firestone, 1995; Spillane & Camburn, 2006; Wettersten, 1994).
These examples include assessment audits, implementing systems to collect, manage, and analyze assessment
data, supporting assessment literacy,
increasing transparency and timeliness,
increasing communications about the purpose
of statewide assessments, making assessment results more usable and understandable for educators and parents, improving the quality
of assessments, and
increasing the
validity and reliability
of statewide assessments.
Good post and I understand your skepticism and certainly I will be looking at more
data and calling a friend
of mine who is more qualified than I to speak about nano diamonds, but if more looking into this confirms these nano diamonds, and this could happen quite quickly, the
validity of the hypothesis will
increase and from there
of course the burden
of necessary evidence is still great as you mentioned.
Some researchers have attempted to
increase the
validity of self - report
data by measuring parent involvement from more than one source (parent, teachers, students).
The strengths
of the study include: a naturalistic setting, which
increases the external
validity of the findings, a multimethod assessment
of two outcomes (parenting and child problem behavior), availability
of four
data points, minimal attrition across waves, and LGM analyses that specified and tested a theoretically based potential mediator
of program effects.