Increase a LW interacting GHG in the atmosphere... causes absorption / random radiation... the 1/2 down
increases radiation pressure... atmosphere expands... thus it cools... BUT, radiation 1/2 down causes an increase in temperature... warming equals -LRB-??)
Not exact matches
There could be three evolutionary processes could explain this adaptive
radiation of hominins: 1) the occupation of novel niches for species living in a highly productive but spatially constrained region when there are deep fresh water lakes in the EARS [46] and 2) the lakes themselves creating spatial structure producing population isolation and vicariance and 3) repeated periods of
increased resource availability stimulated adaptation and
radiation followed by periods of environmental stress when the lakes rapidly dried up imposing strong selection
pressures [28].
Now the
radiation pressure in the cavity between surface and absorber has
increased by a factor of 2.7, due to the higher temperature, but the additional expansion and cooling this causes is still utterly negligible (a further 1.7 parts in 1E11).
With Longwave
radiation the tendency is for the cooler object not to
increase the temperature of the warm object, and if they are at the same air
pressure, and ambient temperature - take 2 identical apples, one at 8C the other at 15C an inch apart, in a room at 20C — the likely outcome is that each apple reaches equilibrium with the ambient temperature of its own entropy, as if they were not in each other's presence.
«Working with data pertaining to 7450 cardiovascular - related deaths that occurred within Budapest, Hungary, between 1995 and 2004 — where the deceased were «medico - legally autopsied» — Toro et al. looked for potential relationships between daily maximum, minimum and mean temperature, air humidity, air
pressure, wind speed, global
radiation and daily numbers of the heart - related deaths... scientists report and restate their primary finding numerous times throughout their paper, writing that (1) «both the maximum and the minimum daily temperatures tend to be lower when more death cases occur in a day,» (2) «on the days with four or more death cases, the daily maximum and minimum temperatures tend to be lower than on days without any cardiovascular death events,» (3) «the largest frequency of cardiovascular death cases was detected in cold and cooling weather conditions,» (4) «we found a significant negative relationship between temperature and cardiovascular mortality,» (5) «the analysis of 6 - hour change of air
pressure suggests that more acute or chronic vascular death cases occur during
increasing air
pressure conditions (implying cold weather fronts),» (6) «we found a high frequency of cardiovascular death in cold weather,» (7) «a significant negative relationship was detected between daily maximum [and] minimum temperature [s] and the number of sudden cardiovascular death cases,» and (8) «a significant negative correlation was detected between daily mean temperature and cardiovascular mortality.»
If we
increased the atmospherice
pressure 90 fold, such as on venus, then there would be 90 times as much N2 per cubic meter, and the back
radiation would go up proportionally, as would the surface temperature.
If CO2 (and its «back
radiation») had any significant effect, then a person would expect that, at the same atmospheric
pressure, an almost - all - carbon - dioxide - atmosphere would show a much greater «greenhouse effect», but what the almost - all - carbon - dioxide - atmosphere shows is ONLY an incremental temperature
increase based on closer proximity to the Sun.