Here is what Whitehead said in 1911 about the theory of types: «All the contradictions can be avoided, and yet the use of classes and relations can be preserved as required by mathematics, and
indeed by common sense, by a theory which denies to a class — or relation — existence or being in any sense in which the entities composing it — or related by it — exist» (MAT 293).
Not exact matches
I think you can certainly drop it into the big category of physics articles that illuminate the universe
by telling us that it is
indeed much more deeply complicated and counter intuitive than most of us would think; that when you start to look at the fringes of what we understand about physics and how the world works, you really get the
sense that we are locked in [to] certain set of perceptions that do not necessarily apply; that our kind of
common sense, everyday [intuitions] are not a very good guide to understanding how the universe can behave at certain scales or under certain conditions.
Indeed her works, which would be characterized abstract art rather than abstract painting, share some
common ground, such as the spectacular use of colors, contrasts and shadows, the playful use of diagonals that creates a solid
sense of perspective while different levels construct both volume and composition, but also the smooth way she moves from one texture to another, giving her paintings a rough surface
by using colors impasto or with a palette knife or simply
by incorporating different materials.
So, much as it is great to see a court such as the California Court of Appeal in Streit v. Covington & Crowe (2000) 82 Cal.App.4 th 441, refer to «
common sense,» it is
indeed true that we can not be governed
by common sense alone.
However, I don't think that they care deep down enough about the opposing viewpoints as expressed herein time and again
by some very intelligent, experienced, farsighted individuals who
indeed have a
common opposing vision regarding where CREA should be placing its energies and
sense of awareness, being squarely in the shoes of its 100,000 PAYING members, and NOT in the minds of everyone else's wannabe entitlement filled gourds (highjacker assisted -
by - government FSBO outfits).
But, guided
by the law — as well as
by the rules of ethics, the training that is part and parcel of a CPM's capabilities and yes, even one's own
common sense — fair housing is
indeed something to celebrate.