God is constant but man is not, and he foreknew the ever - changing world his people would have to deal with; therefore, and if there is
indeed an omniscient God, a Christ - like figure would be our only rational, possible connection to a constant, holy God throughout the evolution of culture and social law.
B. God is
indeed omniscient and omnipotent.
Not exact matches
Indeed, in a conversation I had last week with journalists at a well - known newspaper, reporters there expressed unease that Google might not just freeze their files, but use its
omniscient view to identify their sources.
If God is omnipotent,
omniscient, and omnipresent — The Alpha and Omega — then He is
indeed love.
And why
indeed should definiteness escape detection by an
omniscient knower?
God as love - in - action is more than any particular expression of His love (hence He is transcendent); God as love - in - action is always available (hence He is onmipresent); God as love - in - action is able to envisage every situation in its deepest and truest reality and accommodate Himself to it, so that He can
indeed achieve His loving ends (hence He is
omniscient and omnipotent); God as love - inaction is unswerving in His love, unfailing in its expression, unyielding in His desire to confront men with the demands of love (hence He is righteous).
Believing there is no God means the suffering I've seen in my family, and
indeed all the suffering in the world, isn't caused by an
omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent force that isn't bothered to help or is just testing us, but rather something we all may be able to help others with in the future.