Most of the feet - dragging «in payment and hence the astronomical increase in the debt of both this CP issue and
indeed other judgment debts» have, in the Commission's view, «contributed to the eventual high bill in foreign exchange terms for the State».
Not exact matches
He does
indeed teach the rigorous requirement for purity of motive; but there is forgiveness for those who sin in this area as in any
other, and his severest
judgments are reserved for the proud, the exploiters, and the self - righteous.
President Carter's announcement at Notre Dame in 1977 that Americans had gotten over their «inordinate fear of communism»» together with Secretary of State Cyrus Vance's statement that Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev shared «similar dreams and aspirations about the most fundamental issues»» demonstrated that the degradation of moral
judgment into moral posturing could coexist with breathtaking strategic myopia (and
indeed moral blindness) in minds for which the evocation of the specter of Vietnam marked an end to moral reasoning, or
indeed any
other form of reasoning.
On the
other hand, I was really annoyed by Hart's predictably flamboyant
judgment that «the claim that capitalist culture and Christianity are compatible —
indeed, that they are not ultimately inimical to one another — seems to me not only self - evidently false, but quaintly (and perhaps perilously) deluded.»
Indeed, in a 2012 English High Court
judgment, Mr Justice Mitting endorsed the findings of my own investigation which discovered that a claim, published in the Lancet in February 1998 by Wakefield, Walker - Smith and
others that «Investigations were approved by the Ethical Practices Committee of the Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, and parents gave informed consent» was false.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission wouldn't proceed with a similar complaints against the magazine (neither would the Canadian Human Rights Commission), but in an odd twist, while the Ontario commission's press release said it wasn't within its jurisdiction to deal with the contents of magazine articles, it cast
judgment anyway, saying it «strongly condemns the Islamophobic portrayal of Muslims, Arabs, South Asians and
indeed any racialized community in the media, such as the Maclean's article and
others like them, as being inconsistent
As the
judgment of Lady Hale demonstrates (and as
indeed the disquiet expressed by Lord Browne - Wilkinson and
others in Prudential [1992] 2 AC 386 itself shows), the law is not in a satisfactory state.
Now, lower courts are bound by precedent, even if that precedent was set in the 1700s -
indeed there are plenty of
judgments where the judge says «I don't agree with agree with it but Lord Farquart said in Some Guy v Some
Other Guy [1856]...».