Looking into «causes and context» sounds anodyne enough, until it turns out that the Board is as
independent as the bishops promised it would be in June of 2002, and very specific «causes» multiply to expose a «context» of misgovernance.
Not exact matches
With this
as their point of departure, the
bishops further suggest a process of negotiations to achieve three objectives: «First, it should formalize Israel's existence
as a sovereign state in the eyes of the Arab states and the Palestinians; second, it should establish an
independent Palestinian homeland with its sovereign status recognized by Israel; third, there must he negotiated limits to the exercise of Palestinian sovereignty so that it is clear that Israel's security is protected» (my emphasis).
A Church of England inquiry into child abuse allegations against one of its most respected
bishops almost 60 years after his death has been criticised
as deficient by an
independent review.
As of 2010, the ratings are issued by the Catholic News Service, an «editorially
independent and a financially self - sustaining division» of the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops.
It may be,
as some
bishops complain, that the NRB went beyond what they thought was its mandate, but it was only the promise that its investigation would be
independent and comprehensive that made it possible to enlist the extraordinary talents and devotion of the twelve lay people who worked so hard to produce the report.
Some victim's advocates viewed
Independent Reconciliation and Compensation Programs such
as the one in Buffalo
as further efforts by
bishops to thwart the Child Victims Act, the latest version of legislation aimed at expanding the statute of limitations and establishing a look - back window for child sex abuse cases.