Sentences with phrase «independent view of the science»

He has told me in the past that he consciously eschewed getting involved with the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to maintain an independent view of the science.

Not exact matches

Those other independent predictors of people's views include religious affiliation, age, level of education, specific science knowledge and gender.

Recent updates: Added 1/14: First Showing (additional critic), Slashfilm (additional critic) Added 1/8: Birth.Movies.Death (additional critics), Parallax View, The Tracking Board Added 1/7: Film Journey, The Film Stage (additional critic), First Showing (additional critic) Added 1/5: The Film Stage (additional critics), In Review, Moving Picture Blog, The Playlist (additional critics), Slashfilm (additional critics), Taste of Cinema Added 1/3: CBS News, Den of Geek [UK], Film Pulse, The Film Stage (substituted individual lists for consensus list), Hidden Remote, The Playlist (additional critics), PopCulture.com, Reverse Shot, ScreenAnarchy, Slant (substituted individual lists for consensus list), Slashfilm, Wichita Eagle Added 12/31: artsBHAM, Cape Cod Times, CinemaBlend (additional critics), Collider (additional critics), Criterion [The Daily], Criterion Cast, The Film Stage, First Showing, Flavorwire, The Globe and Mail, The Hollywood Reporter / Heat Vision, Lincoln Journal Star, Monkeys Fighting Robots, NOW Magazine, Omaha World - Herald, Paste, People, ReelViews, Salt Lake City Weekly, San Antonio Current, Screen Daily, SF Weekly, These Violent Delights, Toledo Blade, Uncut, Under the Radar, Vancouver Observer, Vancouver Sun Added 12/29: The Arts Desk, Austin American - Statesman, Austin Chronicle, Awards Daily, Boston Globe, Boston Herald, CinemaBlend (additional critics), Cleveland Scene, Collider (additional critics), The Daily Beast, Deadline, Film Journal International, Houston Chronicle, Ioncinema, Las Vegas Review - Journal, New Orleans Times - Picayune, New York Post, Paper, The Playlist, San Diego City Beat, San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Examiner, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Salt Lake Tribune, Seattle Weekly, Shepherd Express, The Stranger, Tallahassee Democrat, Toronto Star, Tucson Weekly, Tulsa World, Uproxx, The Virginian - Pilot, Washington City Paper, White City Cinema Added 12/27: Awards Campaign, Baltimore Beat, Buffalo News, Chicago Daily Herald, CinemaBlend, Collider, Film School Rejects, GameSpot, JoBlo, Metro UK, Newsweek, Observer, San Jose Mercury News, Seattle Times, Sydney Morning Herald, Tampa Bay Times, Thrillist, USA Today, Village Voice (Wolfe), Wired UK Added 12/22: Chicago Sun - Times, Den of Geek [US], The Guardian, Mashable, Metro US, Sioux City Journal, Star Tribune, The Verge, Wired Added 12/21: BBC, Chicago Reader, The Commercial Appeal, IGN, Las Vegas Weekly, TimeOut New York, Village Voice Added 12/20: A.V. Club, Crave, Esquire, The Independent, Spectrum Culture Added 12/19: The Atlantic, Birth.Movies.Death., CineVue, Newsday, NPR, WhatCulture Added 12/18: Arizona Republic, Yahoo! Added 12/17: Dazed, Flood Magazine, New Zealand Herald, Salon, ScreenCrush, The Star - Ledger (NJ.com), Time Out London, Total Film Added 12/15: BuzzFeed, Christian Science Monitor, Detroit News, Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia Daily News, Vox Added 12/14: Associated Press, Chicago Tribune, Consequence of Sound, Little White Lies, Los Angeles Daily News, RogerEbert.com, TheWrap Added 12/13: Evening Standard, Variety Added 12/12: The Hollywood Reporter, Huffington Post, PopCrush Added 12/11: CBC, The Observer [UK], Wall Street Journal Added 12/8: The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, Slant Added 12/7: Culture Trip, IMDb, The Ringer, Slate, Time, Us Weekly Added 12/6: Cahiers du Cinéma, New York Times, Vogue, Vulture (Yoshida), Washington Post Added 12/5: Scorecard launched with 15 lists.

My view is that the broad statement «AGW is true» and the related related null hypothesis «AGW doesn't exist» are not part of good scientific discussion, because the issue is not an independent scientific theory or hypothesis, but a side result of climate science.

Independent organizations such as the International Energy Agency suggest that needs to occur by 2020, however, but Shell's optimistic view appears to be characterised by its reading (or lack of reading) of the science.

The climate change disinformation machine widely claimed that this controversy demonstrated that several key scientists fraudulently developed some key elements of the science on which the consensus view rests demonstrating that the consensus view was a complete hoax, even though the documents that were at the center of the controversy never were foundational to the consensus view and the scientists at the center of the controversy were exonerated by many independent investigations of the controversy.

Not only that, but some aspects (e.g. the statistical process applied in MBH) would be best analysed by an independent statistician who has little or no knowledge of climate science, because they are most likely to spot a lack of rigour or bias in the process, because they will view the data with a more independent eye.

Carlin: In my view, the arrival of the Obama administration in 2009 resulted in political decisions in the White House on climate science being imposed on EPA rather than EPA relying on its own independent analysis as in most previous decisions.

c. Bear in mind, that these «skeptic scientists» are, believe it or not, generally highly qualified, not just dumb «science deniers», either because they managed to survive the test of long «research funding drought» and extreme hard scrutiny of their papers in the peer review process (as opposed to papers supporting «consensus» compatible views, Naomi Oreskes may introduce a weighing factor in their paper count), or because they just can not be ignored due to their high scientific merits / awards or because they are financing themselves, or because they are already retired or semi retired, now independent from funding.

Together, the independent variables explained 37 % of the variation in certainty that global warming is occurring, and 29 % of the variation in views on global warming harm, which is considered a moderate amount of explained variance in social science research (Cohe 342 n, 1992).

As the authors wrote, «These inconsistencies are so important and sufficiently abstruse that in our view EPA needs to make an independent analysis of the science of global warming rather than adopting the conclusions of the IPCC and CCSP without much more careful and independent EPA staff review than is evidenced by the Draft TSP.»

In our view, the failure of the majority report to make this clear to government and the public contravenes the Authority's obligation under its Act to deliver independent advice and to recommend measures that are «environmentally effective» and based on science.