Have testing changes and administrative innovations softened tests so that they now
indicate higher levels of student achievement than would be the case if older practices had been retained?
Not exact matches
are an annual list, going this year to schools that in the 2011 - 2012 state tests either showed
high achievement levels overall or the greatest progress as
indicated by the state's new system
of «
student growth percentiles» (SGP).
Ultimately, research
indicates that better leadership pays off in
higher levels of student growth and
achievement.
Although KIPP
students have shown substantial academic gains, when KIPP took over a regular,
high - poverty public school, serving a non self - selected population, the program failed,
indicating that the academic
achievement at KIPP may be due to the
high motivation
levels of the
students, and not the charter program itself.
Results from the Texas Assessment
of Knowledge and Skills and the Stanford
Achievement Test
indicated that
students in all three types
of magnet programs in all grades had
higher passing rates on the reading, mathematics, writing, and science subtests
of the assessments than did their respective grade -
level counterparts districtwide.
That is, more precisely and as
indicated in the actual study, SLOs were «not significantly correlated with a teacher's value - added
student test scores;» hence, «a teacher is no more likely to meet his or her SLO targets if [his / her]
students have
higher levels of achievement [over time].»
Furthermore, the review
indicates that authoritative parenting styles are often associated with
higher levels of student achievement, although these findings are not consistent across culture, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.