Sentences with phrase «indicate less warming»

This makes global temperatures indicate less warming than the raw data.

Not exact matches

Untimely infants who were breastfed only and kept warm through nonstop skin - to - skin contact have turned out to be youthful grown - ups with bigger brains, higher pay rates and less unpleasant lives than babies who got regular hatchery mind, as indicated by an investigation distributed for the current week.

For example, Konisky's analysis of the survey responses from 1990 through 2015 indicates that Christians, compared to atheists, agnostics and individuals who do not affiliate with a religion, are less likely to prioritize environmental protection over economic growth, and they are more likely than others to believe global warming is exaggerated.

Their findings indicated that, overall, the contribution of changing solar activity, either directly or through cosmic rays, was even less and can not have contributed more than 10 percent to global warming in the 20th century.

These have shown about a 0.7 C warming over land during the last century, with somewhat less increase indicated over oceans.

Ice - sheet responses to decadal - scale ocean forcing appear to be less important, possibly indicating that the future response of the Antarctic Ice Sheet will be governed more by long - term anthropogenic warming combined with multi-centennial natural variability than by annual or decadal climate oscillations.»

I (or whoever is on my side) get a future warming rate (as determined over the next 20 years) of 0.25 ºC / decade or less — indicating that I (we) believe that future climate change will be modest.

I ask this since the latest study I have read indicates that global warming would actually reduce power of hurricanes and cyclones since there would be less sheer between cold and warm air.

I think it's also worth considering that many people have taken this to indicate that any future corrections will, like this one, indicate a lesser trend in 20th century warming (at any locale or globally).

Research indicates that the Arctic had substantially less sea ice during this period compared to present Current desert regions of Central Asia were extensively forested due to higher rainfall, and the warm temperate forest belts in China and Japan were extended northwards West African sediments additionally record the «African Humid Period», an interval between 16,000 and 6,000 years ago when Africa was much wetter due to a strengthening of the African monsoon While there do not appear to have been significant temperature changes at most low latitude sites, other climate changes have been reported.

Climate models projecting that much less sunlight will be reflected by low clouds when the climate warms indicate that CO2 concentrations can only reach 470 ppm before the 2 ℃ warming threshold of the Paris agreement is crossed — a CO2 concentration that will probably be reached in the 2030s.

The models indicate, by Hansen's reasoning, that storms should be less intense with global warming (kinetic energy decreases), unless there's glacial ice collapse.

This indicates that much of the nation's warming is occurring at night, when temperatures are dipping less often to record lows.

In their analysis of temperature anomalies across the tropical North Atlantic in 2005, Trenberth and Shea [26] indicated that half of the warming (0.45 °C of the 0.9 °C anomaly vs. a 1901 — 1970 baseline) was attributable to monotonic climate change, while only 0.2 °C was attributable to the weak 2004 — 05 El Niño, and even less to the Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation (< 0.1 °C).

Its true that there are a number of indicators that indicate warming, but they mostly indicate way less warming than you'd expect from the surface measurements.

Cooler glazing temperatures would indicate that collector heated air is not working its way out to the glazing and warming it, and / or that the glazing was seeing less radiation heating from the absorber screens.

I say «more or less» because one could argue from the data (as we'll see below) that the warming rate during recent years has upticked with the warmth in 2010 indicating a warming that is occurring faster than projected and is accelerating.

The science indicates warming due to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 will result in less of than 1C of warming with most of the warming occurring at higher latitudes where it will be result in an expansion of the biosphere.

Coupled carbon - cycle climate models indicate that less carbon is taken up by the ocean and land as the climate warms constituting a positive climate feedback.

Less than 2.5 percent of model runs show that global warming is really global luke warming to the degree that real - world observations indicate.

The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than -LSB-...]

Independent analysis seem to indicate that over last half dozen years, the ocean has shown less warming than the long term trend but nevertheless, a statistically significant warming trend.

I think that the Jones record may be exaggerated, but I tend to think that there has been warming, perhaps the lesser amount indicated by satellites.)

And to drive home this point, climate models indicate that if the U.S. were to reduce its emissions by 80 % the impact on U.S. temps would be a measly 0.075 °C reduction - the Asian pollutant warming overwhelms the reduction due to less CO2.

Put simply, saying one is 90 + % sure humans caused at least half of the warming since 1950 does nothing to indicate one believes humans are responsible for less than half the total warming since 1850.

So we are perhaps seeing somewhat less warming than even the Arrhenius experiments indicate, implying some form of net negative feedback in play.

So, if we take what the best science gives us, we find that pretty close to half of the warming that is currently indicated by the extant global temperature datasets may be from influences other than anthropogenic greenhouse gas increases — perhaps a bit less, perhaps a bit more.

If the two trend lines had the same slope and one contained feedback and the other didn't, the one with feedback would indicate a slower warming rate because the feedback would produce less feedback than an initial pulse.

Not likely, but for those who prefer objective science to propaganda, this study clearly indicates warmer temperatures enhance life expectancy - there are less cardiac / respiratory / digestive related deaths when its warmer.

And since we have had rising sea level over last couple centuries, and this generally indicates warming global ocean volume, I expect this trend to continue for the next century [most likely] and due to warming oceans continuation of tread of less polar sea ice.

All predictions I've ever seen indicate that a warmer world will have more food and less disease on average.

«The evidence currently available indicates that NH mean temperatures during medieval times (950-1100) were indeed warm in a 2 - kyr context and even warmer in relation to the less sparse but still limited evidence of widespread average cool conditions in the 17th century (Osborn and Briffa, 2006).

You regularly seem to take positions regarding AGW that assume that anything that may contribute to a warmer planet is a dire threat to humanity and those pieces of information that would indicate it to be a less of a threat to be in error or of minimal impact.

The research indicates that fewer clouds form as the planet warms, meaning less sunlight is reflected back into space, driving temperatures up further still.

It is also worth noting that the CRU record indicates slightly less warming than other global temperature estimates such as the GISS record.

* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office * Differences will be on the edge of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective interpretation * Several attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work of BEST, and to prevent them from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups of people will try to cloud the issue to the point of leaving the public unsure about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly - warming world, the only other certitude being that all mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to human mind.