Not exact matches
To retain ownership rights over IP generated
by their employees, Canadian employers must
indicate with an explicit
clause in the employment contract that IP developed while working at the company is the company's property.
the disposition of shares of common stock to us, or the withholding of shares of common stock
by us, in a transaction exempt from Section 16 (b) of the Exchange Act solely in connection with the payment of taxes due with respect to the vesting or settlement of RSUs granted under our equity incentive plans or pursuant to a contractual employment arrangement described elsewhere in this prospectus, insofar as such RSU is outstanding as of the date of this prospectus; provided, that, if required, any public report or filing under Section 16 of the Exchange Act will clearly
indicate in the footnotes thereto that such disposition to us or withholding
by us of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described in this
clause;
the sale of shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering that occurs during the restricted period, including any concurrent exercise (including a net exercise or cashless exercise) or settlement of outstanding equity awards granted under our equity incentive plans or pursuant to a contractual employment arrangement described elsewhere in this prospectus in order to sell the shares of common stock delivered upon such exercise or settlement in such underwritten public offering; provided that, if required, any public report or filing under Section 16 of the Exchange Act will clearly
indicate in the footnotes thereto that such disposition to us or withholding
by us of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described in this
clause; or
by appellant as a part of the latter constitutional contention disappears
by our holding, as
indicated later in this opinion, that the challenged
clause of the ordinance and New Hampshire's requirement for following a judicial remedy for the arbitrary refusal are valid.
There are several ULIP's issued earlier which contains a
clause indicating that first year premium would be retained
by insurance company for future benefits.
Mosca v. Kiner (277 A.D. 2d 937)- broker's, salesperson's and owner's motion for summary judgment dismissing buyer's complaint affirmed; where property was advertised as having deeded lake rights and the MLS
indicated that the property had access to a private dock, buyer's post closing fraud cause of action fails where buyer had the means available to him of knowing,
by the exercise of ordinary intelligence, the truth concerning the description and boundary of the land and failed to make use of such means; the presence or absence of deeded lake rights was a mater of public record, was not particularly within broker's, salesperson's or owner's knowledge and could have been ascertained
by buyer
by means available to him through the exercise of ordinary intelligence; specific merger
clause in the contract defeats fraud cause of action