Sentences with phrase «indicated by calorie»

So my question is, this article suggests fat loss as primary driver with muscle maintain as secondary (indicated by calorie deficit) but my goal is to prioritise muscle gain (this suggests I should eat at a calorie surplus) within my body recomp plan.

Not exact matches

«Our stem cell - based studies indicate that low - calorie sweeteners promote additional fat accumulation within cells compared with cells not exposed to these substances, in a dose - dependent fashion — meaning that as the dose of sucralose is increased more cells showed increased fat droplet accumulation,» said Sabyasachi Sen, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. «This most likely occurs by increasing glucose entry into cells through increased activity of genes called glucose transporters.»

Other research indicates that high protein diets, those with 18 — 35 % of daily calorie intake provided by dietary protein, are linked to reductions in hunger and increased fullness during the day and in to the evening hours.

The term «nutrient dense» indicates that the nutrients and other beneficial substances in a food have not been «diluted» by the addition of calories from added solid fats, added sugars, or added refined starches, or by the solid fats naturally present in the food.

This indicates that metabolic syndrome is not solely explained by excessive calorie intake (2).

When we controlled for the effect of plant - based protein, there was no change in the association between protein intake and mortality, indicating that high levels of animal proteins promote mortality and not that plant - based proteins have a protective effect» and for people aged 66 +, all - cause mortality...... «was not affected by percent calories from fat, from carbohydrates, or from animal protein.»

Research indicates that most dieters attempt to lose weight by reducing their calories.

The total amount of the energy stored in the food you are eating is represented by the calorie content of the food as indicated on its nutritional label.

Importantly, check out the eye - popping - yet - still - published error: «Food industry data indicate that per capita sales of low calorie (non-nutrititively sweetened) beverages doubled from 1994 to 2006 [correct: from 15L to 30L] while nutritively sweetened beverages decreased by 10 %» [oops, it's a 30 % rise; my bolding; p. 500].

These findings are supported by studies indicating that consuming more than half of your daily calorie intake at or before midday is associated with a lower risk of obesity, compared to eating that amount in the late afternoon or evening (7).

Increased insulin sensitivity, as indicated by decreased fasting concentrations of glucose and insulin, has been demonstrated in rodents on alternate - day fasts both with (19,28,33) and without (17) decreased calorie intake.

The increased presence of fecal fat indicates that between 10 - 20 % of the calories found in nuts may never be absorbed by the intestines.

The data from their studies indicated that for every extra one hundred and fifty calories a person consumed only increased diabetes prevalence by 0.1 %, but if those one hundred and fifty calories were from a can of soda (a sugar sweetened beverage), diabetes prevalence increased eleven-fold, by 1.1 %.

Burn more calories: a study by the University of Roehampton seems to indicate that you can actually burn more calories by taking the steps one at a time.

As might be expected from these results, the glucose drink alone increased the feelings of fullness reported by volunteers, which indicates that they would be less likely to consume more calories after having something sweetened with glucose than something sweetened with more fructose.

The results indicated that percentages of calories from fat and saturated fat, physical activity, and body weight varied by season.