A May 2009 issue of the Journal of Veterinary Behavior highlighted a study that
indicated human attempts to assert dominance over dogs tend to increase canine aggression in return.
Not exact matches
In this chapter I have
attempted to present an understanding of our
human existence which is true to the facts, so far as we know them, which makes sense of and gives sense to our experience, and which
indicates what is meant when we speak, as we do, of the worth and value in our lives.
It is an
attempt to
indicate the minimal implications of granting paradigmatic significance to given phenomena in
human experience.
In contrast to many other
attempts to apply behavioral finance theories, these two leading indicators have the virtue of being quantifiable; in other words, they
indicate the potential tipping points in
human emotions.
Well - meaning owners
attempting to decrease this behavior will push the dog away with a stern voice,
indicating in our best
human language that we don't appreciate the behavior and the dog should keep its distance.
What we have here is a situation in which MM05
attempts to make a point to discredit climate warming which — even if they were correct — would not affect the
indicated existence of
human forcing of climate via GHG emissions / land use changes occurring now.
For policy - makers, the speed of climate change over the coming decades matters as much as the total long - term change, since this rate of change will determine whether
human societies and natural ecosystems will be able to adapt fast enough to survive.New results
indicate a warming rate of about 2.5 C per century over the coming decades (assuming no
attempt is made to reduce GHG emissions).
* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what
indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office * Differences will be on the edge of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective interpretation * Several
attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work of BEST, and to prevent them from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups of people will try to cloud the issue to the point of leaving the public unsure about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly - warming world, the only other certitude being that all mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to
human mind.
This response
indicates that the threat of litigation can cause prison officials to react defensively and
attempt to fix a perceived problem without addressing the
human rights concern at the core of critique.