Dummy readings of head deceleration
indicated weak protection of the head for the rear passenger.
However, readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy
indicated weak protection of that body region, despite the standard - fit seatbelt pre-tensioners and load - limiters in the rear seats.
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good or adequate except for the neck of the 10 year dummy, for which readings of tensile forces
indicated weak protection.
Similarly, neck tensile forces in the 10 year dummy
indicated weak protection of this part of the body.
However, readings from the 6 year dummy
indicated weak protection of the chest and marginal protection of the neck.
Similiarly, neck tensile forces in the 10 year dummy
indicated weak protection of this part of the body.
Compression of the driver dummy's chest
indicated weak protection of this part of the body and injury parameters for the lower legs revealed marginal protection.
However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression
indicated weak protection of the chest.
In the full - width rigid barrier test, high decelerations
indicated weak protection of the rear passenger's head and marginal protection of the chest.
In the front offset test, dummy readings
indicate weak protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy and marginal protection of the neck and chest of the 6 year dummy.
Not exact matches
It has to do with «a dynamic concept» (Jeromias, 1974: 121) which
indicates a divine sovereignty that does not consist in handing down impartial verdicts but in the
protection that the king ensures is given to the
weak and the poor, to widows and orphans, and not so much with a particular place or abstract idea.
In the frontal offset test, readings from the 6 year dummy
indicated poor chest
protection and
weak protection of the neck.
In the frontal offset test, readings from the 6 year dummy
indicated good head
protection, marginal chest
protection and a
weak level of
protection for the neck.