Sentences with phrase «indicating high distress»

Scores ranged from 0 to 24, with 13 or higher indicating high distress.3 PTSR was assessed by the Japanese version of the Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES - R - J), a 22 - item scale including PTSR domains of intrusion, avoidance / numbing, and hyperarousal.4 Scores ranged from 0 to 88, with 25 or higher indicating high PTSR.4 Cronbach α was high for K6 (0.88) and IES - R - J (0.95).

Not exact matches

Although studies have indicated that the monitor has a high false positive rate (says the baby is in distress when he is not), the mother who has been told her baby is in distress may be too concerned to remember that it may not be real.

This indicated that 50 % of the firms should have been rated lower, and they were highly distressed and had a high probability of becoming bankrupt.

For dividend - yield investors, three characteristics help us judge the quality of the companies that offer high dividend yields: profitability, distress, and accounting red flags that can indicate poor management, sometimes extending to fraud.

Evidence from Five Developed Markets,» by Alexeev and Tapon, November 2014) indicate that the ideal number of stocks needed to reduce the vast majority of diversifiable risk is upwards of 50, and perhaps even higher during times of market distress.

So rather than being a show of financial strength, a very high dividend yield may in fact indicate that a company is in distress.

We do not want to pick out the very high yielders, as they may indicate a company in distress and where the dividend may be unsustainable.

In the veterinary field, the CDC study published in February 2015 indicated that veterinarians suffer from mental distress at a significantly higher level than the general population, and that 1 in 6 veterinarians has considered suicide at one time or another since graduation.

Higher resilience has been indicated by some studies about cancer patients to be related to lower psychological distress [18][19].

The total scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.

The Kessler - 10 scale (K - 10) was used to measure non-specific psychological distress during the month preceding the interview.27 A continuous K - 10 score was calculated by summing individual - item responses such that a higher score indicated greater frequency of symptoms of psychological distress.

Like other commonly used scales of nonspecific distress, the questions in the K10 / K6 scales all have high loadings on a first principal factor of nonspecific distress in factor analyses carried out in general population samples.8 This factor is indicated by a heterogeneous set of questions that define behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and psychophysiological manifestations of psychological distress.

Whether such talk represents a clear intention of suicide or is a way of expressing feelings of depression, it indicates a high level of distress that requires attention.

Such thoughts and talk indicates a high level of distress that requires attention.

Higher scores indicated greater distress.

Although the findings indicated no direct relationship between partners» helping motivation and ICPs» well - being or distress, we found ICPs suffering from high pain intensity to benefit from autonomously motivated partners.

Taken together, these results indicate that the higher psychological distress mothers experience at T1, the less their interaction quality improved during massage lessons.

Findings indicate that, regardless of age, children of authoritative parents perform better in school, display fewer conduct problems and show better emotional adjustment than those raised in non-authoritative homes.12 Adolescents with authoritative parents who balance appropriate levels of supervision, nurturance and democratic decision - making tend to achieve better psychosocial outcomes.12 Studies reveal that adolescents with authoritative parents are associated with less psychological distress, higher self - esteem, higher academic achievements, lower levels of delinquency and less substance use.13 Gray and Steinberg13 found that emotional and behavioural problems tended to be associated with the degree of behavioural control and supervision or monitoring.

Notably, our findings indicated that self - compassion may be a particularly important construct, both theoretically and clinically, in understanding psychological distress amongst those with higher levels of attachment avoidance.

Pain distress: the distress caused by patients» pain over the past week was assessed on a zero to 10 numerical rating scale, with higher scores indicating greater pain distress.19

However, a negative relationship was observed for active coping (β = − 0.20) and psychological distress indicating that higher levels of active coping were correlated with lower levels of distress.

At postprocedure and at the 3 - month follow - up, parents in the Parent Training condition reported significantly higher scores than those in the Control or Distraction conditions, indicating greater knowledge that apologizing increases distress (p values <.05).

This might indicate that the clinical sample was a highly selected sample with participants that had a higher degree of depression, anxiety and psychological distress and also reported more severe childhood maltreatment like emotional abuse.

Follow - up analyses examining specific subscales of observed dyadic coping (see Table 6) indicated that nondistressed couples with a depressed wife (G2) demonstrated significantly higher values in relative duration (F (3, 58) = 2.80, p ≤ 0.05) and frequency (F (3, 58) = 2.73, p ≤ 0.05) of problem focused stress communication, although this comparison was only significant in comparison to distressed couples with a depressed husband (G3).

The scale can be used as a continuous variable with increasing levels of emotional distress represented by higher scores or as a categorical variable with standard cutpoints of ≥ 16 and ≥ 23 indicating significant levels of depressive symptomatology but with corresponding differences in sensitivity and specificity for major depressive disorder in community samples (18, 20, 21).