The legal implications of s. 35 and s. 25 remain filled with uncertainty, but their inclusion represents a continuing civilizing of the Canadian constitution and its recognition of indigenous rights, and an expansion of
indigenous access to the legal system to assert and defend those rights.
Not exact matches
After seven hours of discussion over five months, the ideas proffered for improving
access to justice were (1) more money for
legal aid (
to be extracted somehow from the most indebted sub-national government in the world), (2) more e-filing, (3) more pamphlets in more languages, (4) re-purposing the Shirley Dennison fund
to laud someone who does something beneficial wrt A2J, and (5) encouraging
indigenous peoples
to use circles of healing instead of the court
system.
Her desire
to help improve
access to justice led her
to spend a summer working at a
legal aid clinic in Iqaluit assisting
indigenous clients as they navigated the justice
system.
Allocations include: nearly $ 4.8 million in additional annual funding for
legal aid, with a focus on indigenous and family law services; $ 3.8 million per year to fund expansion of Parents Legal Centres; $ 5 million more per year for sheriff services and court staff to help reduce delays in the court system; and an additional $ 3.3 million annually for government initiatives related to family dispute resolution services and increasing digital access to justice serv
legal aid, with a focus on
indigenous and family law services; $ 3.8 million per year
to fund expansion of Parents
Legal Centres; $ 5 million more per year for sheriff services and court staff to help reduce delays in the court system; and an additional $ 3.3 million annually for government initiatives related to family dispute resolution services and increasing digital access to justice serv
Legal Centres; $ 5 million more per year for sheriff services and court staff
to help reduce delays in the court
system; and an additional $ 3.3 million annually for government initiatives related
to family dispute resolution services and increasing digital
access to justice services.
And according
to aboriginal
legal scholar Hannah askew, for non-
Indigenous learners, understanding
Indigenous legal traditions will require not only finding a way
to access the content of these traditions, but also learning how
to interpret a completely different style of
legal system − one that substitutes «a set of interlocking and overlapping processes» for rigid rules, and that requires that those processes be understood via the full range of senses: sound, touch, sight, taste and smell.
Recommendation 50, the lead recommendation in the section on «Equity for Aboriginal People in the
Legal System,» calls upon the federal government, in collaboration with Aboriginal organizations, «
to fund the establishment of
Indigenous law institutes for the development, use, and understanding of
Indigenous laws and
access to justice in accordance with the unique cultures of Aboriginal peoples in Canada.»
Topics will include: justice
system reform, supporting self - represented litigants, serving
Indigenous communities, unbundled
legal services, reduced rate
legal services, paralegal pro bono services, the politics of
access to justice, using new technologies and good corporate citizenry.
Plenary and workshop topics will include: justice
system reform, supporting self - represented litigants, serving
Indigenous communities, unbundled
legal services, reduced rate
legal services, paralegal pro bono services, the politics of
access to justice, and good corporate citizenry.
There is, however, a long - standing, widespread acknowledgement across all sectors of the
legal system that cultural factors and socio - economic disadvantage are barriers
to accessing justice within the Australian
legal system and that these are barriers that confront
Indigenous people across all jurisdictions.