This consent order concerns the unlawful holding out of direct air transportation by Medjet Assistance, LLC (MedjetAssist),
an indirect air carrier specializing in air ambulance services.
Specifically, in the fall of 2009, Ronald E. Mays, through City Skies, over which he exercised primary control and direction, engaged in air transportation as
an indirect air carrier without economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns the unlawful holding out of direct air transportation by Trinity Air Ambulance International LLC (Trinity),
an indirect air carrier specializing in air ambulance services.
This consent order concerns the holding out of direct air transportation by Angel Medflight Worldwide Air Ambulance Services, LLC, (Angel Medflight),
an indirect air carrier specializing in air ambulance services.
Advertising and selling flights without an approved Public Charter prospectus constitutes engaging in air transportation as
an indirect air carrier without Department authority in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 41101.
Since at least 2009, Mr. Pareti and Global, a business entity over which he exercises absolute ownership, direction, and control, have engaged in the provision of air transportation as
an indirect air carrier without holding requisite economic authority from the Department of Transportation.
Not exact matches
This consent order concerns unlawful conduct by Private
Air, Inc., (Private Air) in which the company held itself out as a direct air carrier, 1 when it was not, and engaged in foreign air transportation as an indirect air carrier2 without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 413
Air, Inc., (Private
Air) in which the company held itself out as a direct air carrier, 1 when it was not, and engaged in foreign air transportation as an indirect air carrier2 without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 413
Air) in which the company held itself out as a direct
air carrier, 1 when it was not, and engaged in foreign air transportation as an indirect air carrier2 without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 413
air carrier, 1 when it was not, and engaged in foreign
air transportation as an indirect air carrier2 without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 413
air transportation as an
indirect air carrier2 without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 413
air carrier2 without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 41301.
Late Tuesday, the Canadian Transportation Agency ruled that
indirect air service
carriers like Winnipeg - based NewLeaf are not required to hold an
air licence, as long as they do not portray themselves to the public as the ones operating the flight or the aircraft.
Ontario's travel regulator, the Travel Industry Council of Ontario, said it was also «concerned» that the CTA does not see the need for more regulations over
indirect air service
carriers.