In addition to
the individual acts of abuse which led to criminal charges, The HSUS» investigation also found breeding pigs confined day - and - night in gestation crates, tiny cages that virtually immobilize animals for nearly their entire lives.
Not exact matches
Abuse is the
act of an
individual.
Recent guidance has prohibited the police from arresting under Section 5
of the
Act when they are the
individual being insulted, but campaigners say the vague wording
of the law makes it open to
abuse by other groups.
Libertarianism (especially in the United States) is the idea that a government should be concerned about protecting the rights
of an
individual from
abuse by other
individuals (or government) but the range
of individual agreements is set by the two
individuals (i.e. there is a contract between two
individuals that includes a morally offensive
act.
Amendments to the Bankruptcy Code enacted in to the Bankruptcy
Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection
Act of 2005 require the application
of a â $ means testâ $ to determine whether
individual consumer debtors qualify for relief under Chapter 7.
Neither did the Hayden
Act ---- although it prevented
individuals from adopting animals within three years
of a conviction for animal
abuse or neglect ---- require the key personnel
of the nonprofits receiving the animals to undergo criminal background checks, including screening to be sure they had no personal history
of convictions for animal cruelty and neglect.
We may, in our sole discretion, disqualify any
individual found to be: (x) tampering with the entry process or the operation
of the Giveaway or website; (y)
acting in violation
of these rules; or (z)
acting in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner or with intent to annoy,
abuse, threaten or harass any other person.
She
acts in SFO and FCA investigations, representing companies and
individuals facing allegations
of fraud, bribery and corruption, money laundering and market
abuse.
She currently focuses on advising and defending leading financial institutions against
individual and class claims for violation
of federal and state lending laws and violation
of the violation
of the Commodity Exchange
Act, mortgage servicing claims, elder
abuse and personal injury claims, and consumer protection and unfair competition claims.
Together they seek $ 400 million in damages from the Appellants (
individuals and companies residing in and / or carrying on business in Guatemala) for conspiracy to commit tortious
acts, breach
of fiduciary duties, fraud and
abuse of process, and unjust enrichment.
Facing many compensation claims by victims
of child
abuse, the Catholic Church initially sought to challenge the scope
of vicarious liability, arguing (for example) that it could not be liable for sexual
abuse committed by a priest where the victim was not a Catholic and therefore (it argued) there was not a sufficiently close connection between the
individual priest's wrongful
acts and his priestly status (see Maga v The Trustees
of the Birmingham Archdiocese
of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256).
The NPRM would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information without
individual authorization to: (1) A public health authority authorized by law to collect or receive such information for the purpose
of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability, including, but not limited to, the reporting
of disease, injury, vital events such as birth or death, and the conduct
of public health surveillance, public health investigations, and public health interventions; (2) a public health authority or other appropriate authority authorized by law to receive reports
of child
abuse or neglect; (3) a person or entity other than a governmental authority that could demonstrate or demonstrated that it was
acting to comply with requirements or direction
of a public health authority; or (4) a person who may have been exposed to a communicable disease or may otherwise be at risk
of contracting or spreading a disease or condition and was authorized by law to be notified as necessary in the conduct
of a public health intervention or investigation.
Individual states may very well have some kind
of weird laws, but on the federal level the main one to worry about is the Computer Fraud and
Abuse Act (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. § 1030.
For the rule
of law to exist, citizens (and others) must have a right
of access to an independent lawyer who is able to defend their freedoms without fear or interference, and to ensure that their
individual rights are protected against
abuses and excesses
of power by the state and by those
acting in its name.
Comment: The majority
of commenters supported our proposal to codify the existing special enrollment periods for (1) dependents
of Indians on the same application as the Indian at § 155.420 (d)(8)(ii); (2) victims
of domestic
abuse or spousal abandonment at § 155.420 (d)(10); (3) Medicaid or CHIP denials at § 155.420 (d)(11); (4) material plan or benefit display errors at § 155.420 (d)(12); and (5) data matching issues that are cleared post-expiration
of an inconsistency period or
individuals who are verified through the data matching process to meet the citizenship, national, or immigration criteria described in section 1401 (c)(1)(A)(ii)
of the Affordable Care
Act at § 155.420 (d)(13).
• Assisted in creating and implementing youth programs to meet the
individual requirements
of each participant • Engaged participants in conversation to determine what their specific needs are and provided feedback to youth worker • Provided support in determining the need for intervention in issues such as drug and alcohol
abuse • Assisted participants in determining the type
of services and resources they needed, and arranged for them to be made available •
Acted as participants» advocate in front
of social services and government departments
However dedicated most
of those who managed
individual schools may have been, a flawed governmental policy, poorly funded and administered, led to an educational experience that did not well serve many Aboriginal children, and that exposed some to terrible
acts of physical and sexual
abuse.
The Best Practice Principles apply in all cases involving family violence or child
abuse (or the risk
of either) in proceedings before courts exercising jurisdiction under the Family Law
Act, and provide useful background information for decision makers, legal practitioners and
individuals involved in these cases.
Anna has a wide experience
acting for high profile private
individuals, public bodies, victims and perpetrators
of sexual and physical
abuse and CAFCASS.