Sentences with phrase «individual creators do»

It may be that it will take time to implement the DRM - free option, or it may be that particular deals with license - owners or individual creators do not allow it.

Not exact matches

Unlike Kickstarter, Indiegogo allows individuals to select a «flexible funding» option for their campaign, so even if a project doesn't meet its goal, the creators can collect the raised funds anyway.

In March of 2017, WeWork launched the Creator Awards to reward individuals and organizations for doing creative work.

The intrinsic value of the individual, his dignity and his freedom become meaningful to us only when we see him standing in the same relationship to the Creator as we do ourselves.

I don't know if a creator would choose to interact with individuals or not but it is rather like arguing whether bigfoot would choose to have personal interactions with specific individuals, until there is verifiable proof of bigfoot, people who claim that they have a personal relationship with bigfoot sound silly.

@WobbleBob the fact that an infinite amount of «coincidences» had to happen for any of us to be here «points» to a creator... after that it is up to the individual to seek God... If in fact he does exist an omnipotent / omniscient God should have the ability to reveal himself to that person..

According to the Hebrew Scriptures, the now - fallen human race (of two) was left alone to sort out its own destiny, but we get an idea of where things were going, because the Creator did express approval of certain individuals and used his holy spirit to give them help, guidance, and power, if they had need of it, e.g. Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Daniel, and the other ancient prophets.

Series creator and writer Simon Beaufoy sees the Getty family as an insufferable lot of individuals who don't appear to like, let alone trust, each other.

Students have few reasons to invest themselves in their work and no reason to view learning as a collaborative act if they don't feel valued as individuals, as thinkers, and as creators.

All print runs are paid for by the individual creators, excepting anthologies; the group does NOT cover individual printing cost.

Flash back to a little over a week ago: This is the first year that Marvel Comics as a Publisher did not win any Will Eisner Awards for excellence in comics, and none of the creators who won individual awards like penciller, writer, inker, colourist (awards that were basically invented to recognize achievements by creators working on assembly - line big - two superhero books) had any substantial Marvel comics work this year.

I have created a picture book from individual pictures in the new Kindle Kids Book Creator and it doesn't show a «look inside» preview, only the cover image.

The original creator thought it would be impossible to port Star Castle to the 2600 but this individual has done it and it asking for money to produce more copies of the game (right now he just has the prototype he made).

-- Choose from four different characters each with their own individual abilities, then create your own level in the Level Creator to see how they do!

all creators are not all around living saints, so either you play retarded broken games done by wannabe - good people, or you play imaginative games done by individuals who you might not like

Stated differently, while most people obviously understand that individuals make a living by way of the profit that remains after the costs associated with providing their product or service are covered, at least theoretically there may be someone out there who does not understand that a third party can «affiliate» someone else's products or services and be compensated by the product or service creator / owner for helping spread the word about their offering.

Another strength of this book is that it focuses on areas that have been given short shrift in previous works on Canadian copyright: users» rights (an area of increasing importance, since most public discourse about copyright focuses on what we can't do rather than what we can); aboriginal approaches to intellectual property rights (which emphasize the protection of the honour of clans, cultures, and nations over the rights of individual creators); digital rights management (and its spectacular failure to actually protect content); and public licensing systems (such as the Creative Commons licenses).