«We visited numerous homes and businesses, were in direct contact with more than 100 impacted residents and passed several
individual damage assessments along to FEMA and state officials,» she said.
Not exact matches
By way of a refresher, following the implementation of the new data breach sections of PIPEDA, organizations that experience a data breach (referred to in PIPEDA as a «breach of security safeguards») must determine whether the breach poses a «real risk of significant harm» (which may include bodily harm, humiliation,
damage to reputation or relationships, loss of employment, business or professional opportunities, financial loss, identity theft, negative effects on the credit record and
damage to or loss of property) to any
individual whose information was involved in the breach by conducting a risk
assessment.
Following several years of judicial procedures, the Austrian Supreme Court made a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice on two issues, of which the most interesting one concerns whether the environmental impact
assessment also serves to protect an
individual against pecuniary
damages as a result of the decrease in the value of his or her property.
The Tribunal avoided speculative future lost wages by ordering
damages based on its
assessment of a reasonable time period for the employee to find alternative work, taking into consideration the
individual circumstances of the applicant.