Sentences with phrase «individual decision rules»

«Laboratory experiments with human subjects can provide empirical validation of individual decision rules of agents, their interactions and emergent macro behavior», says Cars Hommes, who leads a group of behavioral economists at the University of Amsterdam.

Not exact matches

The President directed that if the Department makes an affirmative determination as to any of the above three considerations, or the Department concludes for any other reason, after appropriate review, that the Fiduciary Rule, PTEs, or both are inconsistent with the priority of the Administration «to empower Americans to make their own financial decisions, to facilitate their ability to save for retirement and build the individual wealth necessary to afford typical lifetime expenses, such as buying a home and paying for college, and to withstand unexpected financial emergencies,» then the Department shall publish for notice and comment a proposed rule rescinding or revising the Fiduciary Rule, as appropriate and as consistent with Rule, PTEs, or both are inconsistent with the priority of the Administration «to empower Americans to make their own financial decisions, to facilitate their ability to save for retirement and build the individual wealth necessary to afford typical lifetime expenses, such as buying a home and paying for college, and to withstand unexpected financial emergencies,» then the Department shall publish for notice and comment a proposed rule rescinding or revising the Fiduciary Rule, as appropriate and as consistent with rule rescinding or revising the Fiduciary Rule, as appropriate and as consistent with Rule, as appropriate and as consistent with law.

Some of these commenters and petitioners also asserted that individual retirement investors — those most impacted by the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs — have not themselves focused on how investment products, related services, and costs may change and need more time to understand, process, and make decisions regarding their accounts and services.

Broker - dealers are helping investors make better retirement decisions as a result of procedural changes firms have made in preparation for the DOL fiduciary rule, according to a study done by state regulators on the Individual Retirement Account rollover market.

«What is so objectionable is that it confirms the already unConsti.tutional decision this corrupt Supreme Court made when it ruled that a corporation has the same rights as the individual.»

What is so objectionable is that it confirms the already unConstitutional decision this corrupt Supreme Court made when it ruled that a corporation has the same rights as the individual.

But the conversion of the excellent report of the Sole Judgment Debt Commissioner into a political White Paper for electioneering purposes to be published under the supervision of the office of the Attorney - General demonstrates how low we have come in this country in terms of the only constitutionally established office within the executive branch which by hallowed tradition and practice is to defend and uphold the liberty of every individual and the rule of law in its quasi-judicial decision making process.

The ruling, which reverses a lower court's decision, came just over a week after ThinkProgress published the leaked records of Officer Daniel Pantaleo from the Civilian Complaint Review Board, showing he had seven disciplinary complaints and 14 individual allegations against him.

2 p.m., the Committee on Fire and Criminal Justice Services will assemble to make decisions on bills directing the Department of Correction to provide a list of all inmates waitlisted for placement or transfer to alternative housing, to expand its report on «enhanced supervision housing,» to publish «their rules and regulations regarding the use of force by staff on inmates,» to post quarterly reports detailing the visitation of incarcerated individuals, the department's grievance system, and the demographic of incarcerated individuals in city jails, and to create «an inmate bill of rights.»

It is understood that the party's ruling national executive committee backed the decision, giving individual Ukip MEPs the choice of whether to sign up.

Wednesday's decision reversed a lower court ruling, and revived claims by Texas - based groups and individuals, including the McAllen Grace Brethren Church, that the regulation violated their rights under the First Amendment's free exercise clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

The limitations of inferring decision rule use from individuals» sampling behaviour; a computational test of old and new algorithms.

Individuals like Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the dissent for the decision, called the ruling a «threat to American democracy.»

The rule of law is the principle that law should govern a nation, as opposed to being governed by decisions of individual government officials.

Here's my golden rule for The rule of law is the principle that law should govern a nation, as opposed to being governed by decisions of individual government officials.

Yet, in spite of all of the drama that has occurred in the time since the ruling, a number of individuals — from parents to politicians to members of the media — have inexplicably opined in letters - to - the - editor, blog posts and the like that the fateful decision made by four of the seven justices on the State Supreme Court would not hurt the charter school movement in Georgia nor stifle the progress that has been made to give parents and students quality public school choice options.

The rules in the academies handbook say trustees must ensure their pay decisions «follow a robust evidence - based process, and are reflective of the individual's roles and responsibilities».

Behavioral explanations focus on investors» cognitive biases, and the human tendency to use simple rules of thumb to make quick intuitive decisions, with individuals» collective decision - making mistakes translating into security price distortions.

The government introduced stricter mortgage rules even though there were claims by economists that the individual consumer in Canada is very careful while making decisions.

The beauty of a diversified group approach is that you can follow simple buy / sell rules, be wrong about individual decisions or stock picks, and still get good results.

Ultimately what is needed are not more scenarios of Anthropocene Apocalypse but more ideas of how a «good Anthropocene» might emerge with the help of new societal values, new economic rules, landmark political decisions, individual behavior changes and, yes, new technologies.

The particular issue is when an agency action is a rule - making decision, so stays within the agency, or an individual judicial action and so can be brought to the courts.

This approach may avoid running afoul of the Supreme Court's observation that, «[a] s a general rule, decisions concerning budgetary allotments for departments or government agencies will be classified as policy decisions,» because funding (or not funding) individual services may not implicate larger budgetary decisions if the «operational decisions» are made by «lower level» actors within the parameters — including ultimate financial constraints — of the policy.

SCOTUS noted in Martin v. City of Struthers that «Whether such visiting shall be permitted has in general been deemed to depend upon the will of the individual master of each household, and not upon the determination of the community» and ruled that Struthers may not «make this decision for all its inhabitants» (on First Amendment grounds).

The trickle - down effect of the tribunal's ruling is expected to place more decision - making power into the hands of private individuals known as locatees who have rights to band lands and want to develop them.

In my opinion the ECJ's decision in Taricco I that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Italian Constitution, and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 (2) Const.).

A judge can not act as anyone's lawyer, but will do his or her best to ensure that an unrepresented individual is made aware of the rules of court, understands how to adduce evidence, and appreciates the possible consequences of decisions made in the course of the proceeding.

In Canada, courts generally recognize that the well - being of a child is fundamentally interrelated with the well - being of the custodial parent; indeed, a 1996 Supreme Court of Canada ruling in a case called Gordon v. Goertz established conclusively that judges must apply the «best interests of the child» test in making decisions about whether a parent should be allowed to relocate with a child, which in turn requires an individual, fact - specific assessment.

Lord Steyn in the House of Lords has explained the reasons for rules in relation to procedural exclusivity as follows: «The primary focus of the rule... is situations in which an individual's sole aim was to challenge a public law act or decision.

San Francisco's 9th Circuit Court of Appeals cited Bellesiles» research in its decision Silveira v. Lockyer, Dec. 5, 2002, which ruled that the Second Amendment established a collective, not an individual, right to «keep and bear arms.»

This decision made in respect of a failure of lawyers to file a costs» budget — the opportunity to claim costs was effectively lost at the outset of the litigation by the failure to submit the costs» budget — is the touchstone for legal advisers and their clients in understanding the attitude of the courts to failure by a party to adhere strictly and accurately to the requirements of case management set out in the rules, practice directions, and the tailored orders of the court in the individual case.

Legal Realism Unpublished Decisions, Non-Citation Rules, and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 Existing Legal Scholarship and Empirical Data A DETAILED COMPARISON OF PRINT AND ELECTRONIC RESEARCH PROCESSES — IDENTIFYING SALIENT DIFFERENCES Electronic Researchers Are Not Guided by Key System Information to the Same Extent as Print Researchers with Respect to Identifying Relevant Theories, Principles, and Cases Electronic Researchers Do Not Encounter and Interpret Individual Cases Through the Lens of Key System Information to the Same Extent as Print Researchers Electronic Researchers Are Exposed to More — and Different — Case Texts than Print Researchers COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY - DERIVED PREDICTIONS ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF A CHANGED RESEARCH PROCESS: DIVERSITY IN FRAMING AND TILTING AT WINDMILLS Principles and Theories of Cognitive Psychology Influence of Labeling Influence of Categories Confirmatory Bias and Selective Information Processing Application of Cognitive Psychology Principles to Legal Research Diversity in Framing.

The problem is simply stated as follows: Develop a principled approach to reconcile traditional accounts of the rule of law with the modern reality that administrative agencies and statutory tribunals who do not operate like or resemble the ordinary courts but who nevertheless occupy a large amount of space in our legal system and can not avoid making legal determinations in exercising their statutory duties which often implicate individual rights and interests to a greater extent than judicial decisions.

Justices approve individual appeals in combined cases: Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a final decision in one of multiple consolidated cases can be immediately appealed while the other cases are still pending.

The ECJ's decision that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Arts. 2 and 3 Const., and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 Const.)

The Italian constitutional Court has upheld national rules which had been judged by the ECHR as contrary to the Convention, arguing that such rules nevertheless protected a different constitutional principle of the national constitution and the convention could not modify the constitution, beng it a lower rank act - so from a theoretical point of view the CJEU adopts the same approach: the ultimate decision on whether a EU act is in compliance with EU law must be taken within EU only (to make a parallel, think of the CJEU approach for WTO decisions: despite an action being contrary to WTO as decided by the appellate body, nonetheless individuals can use such illegality as a ground to void the action within the EU system)

The rationale of courts» decisions is instead published with redactions aimed at hiding the names of individuals or entities mentioned therein (access to full text is governed by the same rules governing access to the investigation file — see question 5).

The wrong in the Registrar's decision is caused by the application of a categorical evidentiary rule that works in an exclusionary manner to deny registration and status to an entitled individual who can not identify a relevant ancestor by name.

Under the final rule's section on personal representatives (§ 164.502 (g)-RRB-, a person with authority to make decisions about the health care of an individual, under applicable law, may make decisions about the protected health information of that individual, to the extent that the protected health information is relevant to such person's representation.

Response: Under the final rule, the decision whether to tie an agreement to restrict to the way the individual pays for services is left to each covered entity.

As with many of the requirements of this final rule, health care providers are given latitude and expected to make decisions regarding disclosures, based on their professional judgment and experience with common practice, in the best interest of the individual.

A legal representative is a personal representative under this rule if, under applicable law, such person is able to act on behalf of an individual in making decisions related to health care, with respect to the protected health information related to such decisions.

With respect to deceased individuals, the final rule describes when a covered entity must allow a person who otherwise is permitted under applicable law to act with respect to the interest of the decedent or on behalf of the decedent's estate, to make decisions regarding the decedent's protected health information.

In the proposed rule, we defined designated record set as «a group of records under the control of a covered entity from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual and which is used by the covered entity to make decisions about the individual.»

Under the final rule, a person is a personal representative of a living individual if, under applicable law, such person has authority to act on behalf of an individual in making decisions related to health care.

We clarify that the rights and authorities of a personal representative under this rule are limited to protected health information relevant to the rights of the person to make decisions about an individual under other law.

However, the study assumed broader access than provided in the rule, which requires access only to information in records used to make decisions about individuals, not all records with identifiable information.

Response: We believe individuals should have a right to access any protected health information that may be used to make decisions about them and modify the final rule to accomplish this result.

Comment: Some commenters asked that the NPRM provision allowing informal decision - makers access to the protected health information of an incapacitated individual should be maintained in the final rule.

Comment: A commenter suggested that the final rule should provide health plans with a set of criteria for formally identifying an incapacitated individual's decision - maker.