Not exact matches
Overall, the chances of seeing a rainfall
event as intense as Harvey have roughly tripled - somewhere between 1.5 and five times more likely - since the 1900s and the intensity of such an
event has increased between 8 percent and 19 percent, according to the new study by researchers with World Weather
Attribution, an international coalition of scientists that objectively and quantitatively assesses the possible role of climate change in
individual extreme weather
events.
The latest in so - called
attribution studies is to study each
individual event by itself, looking for how climate change may have made it stronger or more likely.
Although the science of
event attribution has developed rapidly in recent years, geographical coverage of
events remains patchy and based on the interests and capabilities of
individual research groups.
Myles Allen is the Principal Investigator of climateprediction.net and was the first to propose the use of Probabilistic
Event Attribution to quantify the contribution of human and other external influences on climate to specific
individual weather
events.
But
attribution of
individual events is not particularly useful in assessing future risk, even if it could be «got right.»
Individuals with high self - esteem made more stable and global internal
attributions for positive
events than for negative
events, leading to the reinforcement of their positive self - image.