I critique how we do church, just as we ought to critique how we do family, work and politics in order that
individual human liberty is not violated.
Not exact matches
Where the power of those instruments needs to be limited, as it surely sometimes does, it can not be done by pulling the rug out from under
individual,
human liberties.
Because the
individual human subject» Leff's godlet» is the modernist starting point, it seems reasonable to place a heavy burden of justification upon anyone who seeks to restrain the
liberty of that subject.
Reno develops several lines of argument against the view that respect for
human dignity is consistent with, let alone requires, that
liberty be understood as the
individual's projection of the self onto the universe.
Drawing from the Islamic imperative that «God is one» and from the Qur» an's teaching about Adam and Eve, Rauf arrives at two essential principles: that all
humans are equal «because we are born of one man and woman,» and that «because we are equal... we have certain inalienable
liberties,» such as the freedom to accept or reject God, to think for ourselves (ijtihad) and to make
individual choices without coercion.
During the five years that the Earth has trembled beneath our feet, its vast
human masses splitting and reforming, we have begun to be conscious of the fact that we are in the grip of forces many millions of times transcending our
individual liberties.
The negative goals liberals pursue can be summarized under the heading of the avoidance of evil: to protect the
liberty of
individuals from «dictatorship, torture, poverty, intolerance, repression, discrimination, lawlessness,» and other affronts to
human dignity.
«[T] he process of secularism has engendered an explosion of claims of
individual liberty... in which the
human being has come to occupy the central ground.
He had not thought of them as
individuals — young men and women who fall in love and want homes, folks who have babies and cherish for them the same ambitions which he feels for his,
human beings who find this earth a perplexed and tangled place in which to live, and who want more leisure, more comfort, and more
liberty.
The New Patriotic Party (NPP) in Ghana believes in the principles that democratic societies provide
individuals with the best conditions for political
liberty, personal freedom, equality of opportunity and economic development under the rule of law; and therefore being committed to advancing the social and political values on which democratic societies are founded, including the basic personal freedoms and
human rights, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; in particular, the right of free speech, organization, assembly and non-violent dissent; the right to free elections and the freedom to organize effective parliamentary opposition to government; the right to a free and independent media; the right to religious belief; equality before the law; and individual opportunity and prospe
human rights, as defined in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights; in particular, the right of free speech, organization, assembly and non-violent dissent; the right to free elections and the freedom to organize effective parliamentary opposition to government; the right to a free and independent media; the right to religious belief; equality before the law; and individual opportunity and prospe
Human Rights; in particular, the right of free speech, organization, assembly and non-violent dissent; the right to free elections and the freedom to organize effective parliamentary opposition to government; the right to a free and independent media; the right to religious belief; equality before the law; and
individual opportunity and prosperity.
R. Clarke Cooper, executive director for National Log Cabin Republicans, said the values of protecting
human freedoms and
individual liberty that espouses are conservative values.
Speaking at the G20 African Partnership Conference in Berlin, Germany, he said African leader «must first facilitate the building of a new sustainable African civilization where there is accountable governance... rule of law,
individual liberties and
human rights, where the principles of democratic accountability are guaranteed and where we mobilize the immeasurable vast resources of Africa to resolve Africans problems.
We have begun to build a Ghana that is able to look after its people through intelligent management of the resources with which it has been endowed by the Creator; a Ghana which is governed according to the rule of law, respect for
individual liberties and
human rights, and the principles of democratic accountability.
All governments in the region and continent, the President stressed «need to collaborate to ensure that the countries of Africa adhere to and maintain common values of governance, i.e. the principles of democratic accountability, respect for
individual liberties and
human rights, and the rule of law.
According to President Akufo - Addo, «they have manifested, in the 4th Republic, their deep attachment to the principles of democratic accountability, respect for
individual liberties and
human rights, and the rule of law.»
Again, as members of the Commonwealth, the President noted that Ghana and the United Kingdom continue to share common values of democratic accountability, good governance, respect for
individual liberties and
human rights, and the rule of law.
Humans must adapt either way, and the question should be — do we we want to do it consensually or do we instead wish to hand off $ trillions of wealth and lots of
individual liberty to massive political self interests which can, without question, be correctly referred to as the Environmental Industrial Complex?
The Orwellian provisions proposed by ACTA of mandatory network - level filtering by ISPs will have a considerable impact upon the civil
liberties of
individuals and may well be incompatible with
human rights legislation.
Coptic Solidarity welcomes the new administration's desire to partner with Egypt to defeat terrorism, but strongly urges it to simultaneously raise and demand radical improvement in areas of
human rights,
individual liberties and civil society with the Egyptian government.
To put this in a
human rights context, asking people (including their physicians) to wait for up to a year before accessing newsworthy cancer research — to ostensibly protect publisher business models — seems contrary to «the right of the
individual to life,
liberty, security of the person,» to cite the Canadian Bill of Rights.
This case concerned the question of whether non-derogating control orders imposed on six
individuals under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (PTA 2005) breached Art 5 (right to
liberty) of the European Convention on
Human Rights (the Convention).
Legal aid: when the government subsidizes legal services for
individual litigants in restricted areas such as where
liberty is at risk (criminal law), family law and
human rights.
Actions aimed at the incitement of national, racial, or religious enmity, abasement of
human dignity, and also propaganda of the exceptionality, superiority, or inferiority of
individuals by reason of their attitude to religion, national, or racial affiliation, if these acts have been committed in public or with the use of mass media, shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of 500 to 800 minimum wages, or in the amount of the wage or salary, or any other income of the convicted person for a period of five to eight months, or by restraint of
liberty for a term of up to three years, or by deprivation of
liberty for a term of two to four years.
Lord Justice Hughes and Mr Justice Treacy said they had found no sign of any bid by the former Home Office — and now the Ministry of Justice — to influence
individual cases but ruled that the government's present arrangements for the board «do not sufficiently demonstrate its objective independence» as required by Art 5 (right to
liberty) of the European Convention on
Human Rights.
This is truth, this is the reality of CAIR, who stands before the court and demands that we «by our own hands» provide them with all the protections and
liberties afforded an organization or
individual who wishes to be a part of a democratic country yet have utterly no intention of abiding, now or at any time in the future, by the dictates of a lawful, democratic society which values and holds sacred,
human rights, freedom, rule of law, women's rights, gay rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and many other freedoms.
We resolve to fulfill the yearning of the
human spirit for
liberty, justice and community; to advance
individual and associational freedom; to vanquish oppression, privation and cruelty in all their forms.