Sentences with phrase «individual is responsible for his actions»

Not exact matches

This type of boss is also responsible for distributing individual rewards and penalties based on favoritism or spite, or as an indirect way to try and manipulate the course of actions in the office place.

Since these factors differ according to individuals, we can not guarantee your success or income level, nor are we responsible for any of your actions or inactions.

Whether it is a technician or company president, janitor or engineer, sales team or board of directors, each of the individuals involved is responsible for his or her actions to God.

«Individuals are responsible for almost half of emissions, so people have to start taking action in their own lives if we are to meet the challenge of climate change,» Mr Benn said.

Not against the individuals involved, but against the chief officers of the forces involved, who in law are responsible for the actions of officers acting on their behalf.

James added that she knows «this will probably get me into trouble as always,» but that it was important to note that the city is doing all it can do to address affordable housing, providing resources and giving individuals subsidies, among other actions — but that the state government is «primarily responsible for addressing the homeless situation.»

Secondly, the impulsive individuals had less activity in the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for «putting on the brakes» for impulsive actions.

Each individual is responsible for his own actions.

Most importantly, it takes seriously what it means to understand the relationship between how we learn and how we act as individual and social agents; that is, it is concerned with teaching students how not only to think but to come to grips with a sense of individual and social responsibility, and what it means to be responsible for one's actions as part of a broader attempt to be an engaged citizen who can expand and deepen the possibilities of democratic public life.

After reviewing their printed SF Form 50, Notification of Personnel Action, individuals are responsible for contacting their HR representative to have their data corrected in FPPS.

He points out that each individual is responsible for his own actions and how each person reacts to the situations to which they are exposed.

The Member is responsible for the actions of the nominated individual.

The installation contains a large portrait of one individual affected by the economic crisis who was threatened with eviction from his home; a video projection presenting TAF's actions and social practice against eviction, and a graphic chart offering relevant information on the economic and hosing situation in Spain, such as «There is an eviction in SPain every 8 minutes, 532 evictions a day during 2012's first semester...» Audiences are invited to write postcards to the financial institutions who are responsible for conducting these evictions.

In addition to calling out the most prominent current climate change denier of them all — Donald Trump, we profiled eight other leading climate change deniers in the world of politics, individuals whom — as the commentary notes — have been responsible for «clouding the climate change debate» and stalling action by participating in «a campaign of deliberate misinformation.»

The only thing that UEA can argue is that the law was broken by specific individuals and that it should not be held responsible for their illegal actions.

Because the change was requested by the individuals responsible for the decision on action (the IPCC Chairman and the Co-chairs of the relevant working group), the request should move to Section 3, Step 5A of the Error Protocol.

If a family member or loved one has passed away as a result of another individual's actions or negligence or those of a company or organization responsible for the death, it is absolutely essential to hire a Lafayette injury lawyer to seek legal recourse for your loss.

It presages a law captured by the rhetoric of the right to freedom of expression without due regard to the value underlying the particular exercise of that right; a law in which, under the guise of the right to freedom of expression, the «right» to offend can be exercised without responsibility or restraint providing it does not cause a disruption or disturbance in the nature of public disorder; a law in which an impoverished amoral concept of «public order» is judicially ordained; a law in which the right to freedom of expression trumps — or tramples upon — other rights and values which are the vital rights and properties of a free and democratic society; a law to which any number of vulnerable individuals and minorities may be exposed to uncivil, and even odious, ethnic, sexist, homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic taunts providing no public disorder results; a law in which good and decent people can be used as fodder to promote a cause or promote an action for which they are not responsible and over which they have no direct control; a law which demeans the dignity of the persons adversely affected by those asserting their right to freedom of expression in a disorderly or offensive manner; a law in which the mores or standards of society are set without regard to the reasonable expectations of citizens in a free and democratic society; and a law marked by a lack of empathy by the sensibilities, feelings and emotional frailties of people who can be deeply and genuinely affronted by language and behaviour that is beyond the pale in a civil and civilised society.

For example, while two individuals may be legally responsible for the same offence, one who assists or merely encourages (the proverbial «aider or abettor») bears less moral responsibility than the offender who physically committed the crime.Reckless actions are less morally blameworthy than planned, deliberate ones and are therefore somewhat less deserving of criminal sanctiFor example, while two individuals may be legally responsible for the same offence, one who assists or merely encourages (the proverbial «aider or abettor») bears less moral responsibility than the offender who physically committed the crime.Reckless actions are less morally blameworthy than planned, deliberate ones and are therefore somewhat less deserving of criminal sanctifor the same offence, one who assists or merely encourages (the proverbial «aider or abettor») bears less moral responsibility than the offender who physically committed the crime.Reckless actions are less morally blameworthy than planned, deliberate ones and are therefore somewhat less deserving of criminal sanction.

When an adult or child sustains a personal injury or dies as a result of the negligence of an individual or entity, the negligent party may be held liable for the damages suffered by the injured victim or victim's family in a negligence or wrongful death action brought against the responsible parties.

In these situations, it's important to take action against any negligent individuals or organizations responsible for the injury so that you can make a swift recovery.

If you have been hurt in a boating accident, you may be able to file a negligence action against the individual responsible for your injuries.

The claim was brought against the Claimant's employer (even though it was an individual that was alleged to have been the harasser) on the basis that they were responsible for her actions (known as «vicarious liability»).

A pet owner is responsible for the actions of their pet, including if it should attack and harm another individual.

Individuals at all levels who may be responsible for transmitting PHI must be deliberate about their actions.

While a hospital may not be responsible for the actions of individual healthcare practitioners, it is responsible for implementing policies, equipment, and systems which protect the health of its patients.

FINRA is responsible for administering licenses to qualified investment professionals, checking that there is proper disclosure for any securities related advertising, write and enforce rules that govern the actions of broker - dealer firms and individual securities brokers, and educate investors about our financial markets.

Who is the individual responsible for taking action?

So an individual may be responsible for an action but not guilty of committing that action.

The gut check is a simple exercise in which the individual or individuals responsible for taking those day to day actions are asked on a scale of one to ten how committed they are to accomplishing those tasks on a daily basis, and for being governed by those principles necessary to do so, regardless of what else gets in the way.

A confluence of research has identified executive functioning deficits as a common characteristic of individuals with FASD.9 15 — 27 Damage to neurological structures, including the prefrontal regions of the brain, is a significant hypothesised cause for these deficits.28 29 Executive functions are defined as a set of cognitive processes responsible for orchestrating purposeful, goal - directed behaviour.15 30 31 These processes are responsible for the ability to plan, organise, attend, problem solve and inhibit responses.31 It is also suggested that the ability to self - regulate emotional responses and behavioural actions is interrelated with the construct of executive functioning.17 28 32 Deficits in executive functioning and self - regulation can lead to learning and behavioural problems that impact a child's educational outcomes as they struggle to cope with the complex demands of school life.16 20

If ever there were a more persuasive argument for single licensing, that is, an end to paternalism in real estate, the creation of a system where each individual is solely responsible for their actions, this is it.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained

Managing brokers are responsible not only for their own actions, but for the actions of the other licensees and individuals associated with their brokerage.

The Owner alleged that Fannie Mae had essentially become the employer of the individuals who threw out her possessions because of the extensive control it exercised over the contractors and so was responsible for their actions.