If one is evaluating the details of Briffa et al 1998 (& other of his / their derivative articles circa 1998 and later) and based on those follow the evolution of graphics and associated paragraphs in the IPCC TAR and AR4, then by what standards should we base
our individual judgments about the «hide the decline» team?
The first fork in the road that confront us (in this case, the group of us whom Andy has brought together) appears when we make
our individual judgments about the extent to which the dread to risk ratio is capable of being manipulated.
«People are going to make
individual judgments about individual candidates.»
Not exact matches
Albert Einstein would later write
about her, «Her strength, her purity of will, her austerity toward herself, her objectivity, her incorruptible
judgment - all these were of a kind seldom found in a single
individual... Once she had recognized a certain way as a right one, she pursued it without compromise and with extreme tenacity.»
Check out this free search tool and find information
about individuals that have been named in SEC court actions or administrative proceedings and had
judgments or orders issued against them.
And indeed he cautions against any subjective
judgments being made by or
about individuals - «humble spouses follow the Lamb more easily than proud virgins».
On
judgment day, I don't want to try to rationalize why I voted for a cult member who caused souls to be damned, by feebly explaining that I was more concerned
about repealing Obamacare, preventing a redistribution of wealth, preventing abortion (those lives are in heaven), preventing gay marriage, and restoring
individual liberties.
The discrepancies are overlooked, and the atypical
individuals are treated exactly as if they fulfilled the a priori
judgments about them.
And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still
about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the
judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every
individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.
I am talking
about us as
individuals trying to sit in
judgment on other people
about the decisions they have made in their own lives.
Because we dare not speak for God presumptively (as you've seen some TV preachers do in pronouncing certain public events as unmistakably God's
judgment for specific sins), we should pursue a reverent agnosticism
about why
individual bad things happen.
As so very often, we have picked a virtue (or quasi-virtue) that we like the sound of - in this case open - mindedness - and placed it on an artificial pedestal, abstracted from any context that might help us come to a considered
judgment about its merits in
individual circumstances.
Still, when it comes to making
judgments about another
individual's subjectivity, we can always be fooled in the end - it could be an insentient computer, after all.
Managers, in consultation with the medical staff and the players themselves, have to make
judgments about what's best for
individuals and the team.
«Despite the well - known idiom to «not judge a book by its cover,» the present research shows that such
judgments about the cover are good proxies for
judgments about the book — even after reading it,» says Zayas, who is chairing a session at the SPSP conference called «When to Judge a Book by Its Cover: Timing, Context, and
Individual Differences in First Impressions.»
«That modern secular
individuals are prone to cling on to beliefs
about science, in the same way that their ancestors turned to the gods,» they write in their paper, «carries no
judgment on the value of science as a method but simply highlights the human motivation to believe.»
Hennekens and Bjorkman advise doctors that, based on the current totality of evidence, in the primary prevention of vascular disease and cancer, any
judgments about prescribing long - term aspirin therapy for apparently healthy
individuals should be based on
individual clinical
judgments between the doctor and each of his or her patients.
The knowledge that a genetic variant increases the risk of spreading a sexually transmitted disease might lead to negative
judgments about, and marginalization of,
individuals who carry that variant.
Once they have a firm grasp of the client's likes and dislikes, the matchmakers make a
judgment call
about whether they can help that
individual find the right relationship.
The concept of professional capital on the other hand consists of three components: human capital (the quality of
individual teachers); social capital (the collaborative power of teachers as a group); and decisional capital (the wisdom and expertise of teachers to make sound
judgments about learners that are cultivated over time).
[38] It is purely a
judgment call
about which result is fairer to
individual teachers and how it may affect achievement goals.
These systems, encouraged by the Obama administration's Race to the Top and No Child Left Behind Waiver programs, use measures of student learning alongside other measures of teachers» classroom performance to make formative and summative
judgments about individual teachers.
Nevertheless, recipients should look carefully at
individual showings of disadvantage by
individuals with disabilities, making a case - by - case
judgment about whether such an
individual meets the criteria of this appendix.
In economics, you learn
about how the
judgments of
individuals can influence trends in business.
Just as broad - brush
judgments about people based on race, gender or age are frequently false, the same is true for
individual dogs of a particular breed.
While
individuals are not entirely deliberate, spontaneous, emotional, or analytical (or any single combination), it's important to understand where each teammate lands on the quadrant, without
judgment about which type is best / worst.
For these reasons and others, it is not possible to reach valid and reliable
judgments about systematic patterns in news coverage either through anecdotal blogging
about specific articles or by a lone
individual reading through a population of articles, especially when the
individual has a deep and longstanding commitment to a belief in widespread false balance.
I don't have any
judgment about either
individual.
Our team of insurance coverage attorneys has advised
individuals and businesses
about insurance coverage issues including insurance policy coverage opinions, declaratory
judgments on policy coverage and defense of insurers against breach of contract and bad faith claims.
«When you're talking
about a defamation
judgment against an
individual who may ultimately end up being
judgment proof for future lawsuits, there has to be a mechanism to prevent against the perpetuation of statements that a jury has concluded are defamatory,» Mr. Rich said.
Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by
individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of
judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling
about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case
about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.
But the
judgment could force councils to be open and transparent
about how they reached decisions
about the funding of
individuals who apply for social care support, making it easier for applicants to challenge decisions.
Furthermore, when a covered entity can not practicably obtain an
individual's agreement before disclosing protected health information to a relative or to a person involved in the
individual's care and is making decisions
about such disclosures consistent with the exercise of professional
judgment regarding the
individual's best interest, covered entities must take into account whether such a disclosure is likely to put the
individual at risk of serious harm.
Several commenters asserted that this criterion was unsound in that it would impose on reviewing bodies the explicit requirement to form and debate conflicting value
judgments about the relative weights of the research proposal versus an
individual's right to privacy.
First, as in the proposed rule, covered entities may deny
individuals access to protected health information
about them if a licensed health care professional has determined, in the exercise of professional
judgment, that the access requested is reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the
individual or another person.
Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information
about an
individual without the
individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional
judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the
individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the
individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the
individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the
individual is able to agree to the disclosure.
Uptowork.com does not review, screen, edit or monitor the Documents or make any
judgments about or selections of Documents or
individuals.
Expertresumebuilder.com does not review, screen, edit or monitor the Documents or make any
judgments about or selections of Documents or
individuals.
Think
about it: What these studies suggest is that absence an employment background check employers will have no choice but to rely exclusively on an
individual's stated employment record (as reported in a job application) or the employer's own personal
judgments about an
individual.
Cultural competency is a prerequisite for implementing an individualized, strengths - based approach because
individuals from different cultural backgrounds may hold different values and make different
judgments about how strengths are defined and the types of interactions that communicate respect.
If you are an LGBTQ +
individual who is struggling with telling your friends, family members, community or even yourself
about your identity, we offer coming out support in a safe,
judgment - free space.
And
judgments about requirements for
individual therapy could be made afterward based on a more complete understanding.
Romantic relationship satisfaction corresponds to an
individual's
judgment about the positivity of his / her relationship (Arriaga, 2001; Avivi, Laurenceau, & Carver, 2009).
Psychologist MHPs tend to be trained to recognize and be rather publicly self - conscious [96]
about acknowledging their own biases, but unfortunately many times this only results in absurd overcorrecting to the point at which they are in fact unable to exert common sense to make decisions or
judgments that comport with generally accepted ideas
about what is normal or healthy, or even what's realistically workable for the everyday lives of the
individuals in question (except, of course, if those ideas have been placed into the popular discourse by the trade associations themselves, or happen to serve the MHP's own agenda).
Judgments about the class of a property need to be made on a property - by - property basis by properly trained
individuals.