Sentences with phrase «individual litigants»
The phrase "individual litigants" refers to people who are involved in a legal dispute and are seeking a resolution through a court process. It describes individuals who are taking legal action or being sued by someone else, rather than entities or organizations. Full definition
It also seems to have been formulated with only individual litigants in mind.
doubleaspect.blog
Support isn't typically provided for cases that affect only individual litigants or the law of a particular state or region.
Privacy interests are also of concern to many individual litigants who would not want personal details of their life produced in discovery to be part of the public record.
Typically, litigation conducted in the country is funded by individual litigants out of their personal finances.
* While court filings are public record, is there a significant difference between the impact on the privacy of individual litigants when a factum is filed in the Registrar's office, compared to posting the same document on the Internet?
Defeated there, she complained to the district court under section 1983 of the U.S. Code, which individual litigants often use in an effort to show that state or local officials have deprived them of constitutional or federal statutory rights.
There's less need to destroy (or avoid making) records when the government limits how much exposure a wrongdoer faces from individual litigants, as in Europe, so less pressure to, say, «simplify» laws by removing requirements to document at all.
I know it goes against the grain of our increasingly commodified world and sounds a bit flakey, but I prefer to think of litigants (at least individual litigants) as «justice seekers» rather than users or customers.
The Lipnetwork firmly despatches individual litigants in person off to AdviceNow which has received Ministry support for web - based information.
Over the years, FAC has initiated many lawsuits and other legal actions — an ambitious program of «strategic litigation» designed to enhance legal protections for all citizens (not just a few individual litigants).
As a matter of policy, it is difficult to support Ontario's position as it caused the delay and saddled individual litigants with the burden.
Justice Cromwell found that a comprehensive declaration is a more reasonable and effective means of obtaining final resolution on the issues than having individual litigants raising constitutional challenges, especially since summary convictions are not always the best place to raise a complex constitutional challenge.
This database allows individual litigants to be identified as Aboriginal and / or Torres Strait Islander on the basis of the individual self identifying as Indigenous at the time of filing an Initiating Application (in either the Federal Magistrates Court or the Family Court of Australia) or a Response (in the Family Court only).
Legal aid: when the government subsidizes legal services for individual litigants in restricted areas such as where liberty is at risk (criminal law), family law and human rights.
«The acts, the occurrences, events that take place while you are incarcerated or while being rehabilitated are not to be published to the public or to individual litigants in litigation,» says Sayce.
Moreover, one could imagine different judges concluding (1) that court fees are never permissible or (2) that exemptions are not always necessary or (3) that this particular fees regime was reasonable because it allowed for exemptions for impoverished litigants; indeed, the regime aimed to strike a delicate balance between the interests of individual litigants and the public interest in effective, efficient access to justice (see Rothstein J.'s dissent, paras. 103 - 112).
The ATQ dismissed the individual litigants» motions to dismiss, Justice Brown noted, «concluding that under s. 102 of the Act respecting administrative justice, a person who is not an advocate may do everything that is needed for the representation of the Minister, both oral and written, before that tribunal's social affairs division and that this power is not in conflict with the Act respecting the Barreau du Québec.»
The justice system risks losing the confidence of the public if access is beyond the reach of average Canadians.12 The new reality of the digital world leads to the obvious concern that individual litigants will seldom have the means or resources to tackle the e-discovery behemoth, particularly if they are taking on the proverbial corporate giant.
If people begin to believe that fair and full justice system outcomes are largely unachievable because the state has placed its own organizational interests ahead of the interests of individual litigants and observers as justice seekers, then a much greater crisis than the perpetuation of a culture of delay will ensue.
While the individual litigants in these matters, and their counsel likely never considered the wider impact of their choices on others seeking to access the family courts, the result was that court and judicial resources were redirected to from other cases to their own.
The trial process has become increasingly long and expensive, which can make it effectively inaccessible to individual litigants of modest means.
This means that that individual litigants will come to court raising grievances personal to them.
Alan Macek, an intellectual property lawyer at Dimock Stratton LLP, points out that the federal courts also hear immigration and citizenship cases where the tariff - based system offers predictable costs for individual litigants and improves access to justice.
As we have written about previously in this blog (see To Arbitrate or Litigate, that is the Question), litigation in Ontario has become increasingly slower, more document - heavy, and less accessible for individual litigants.
As I have argued before, «the real issue [with the hearing fees] is not that the courts are being interfered with, but that individual litigants are.»
The real issue is not that the courts are being interfered with, but that individual litigants are.
The entire court system is not impugned by the actions of any frivolous, individual litigant.
You - the generic you — really want to increase access to just and (in an overall sense) reduce the cost to individual litigants?
All of these facts appear to be true: there is enormous demand for law school; individual litigants can not afford counsel in litigated cases; there is a shortage of articling positions; many sole practitioners operate in economically marginal circumstances; it is not clear that all Canadian lawyers are competent and providing a high quality of legal services.
The structure of the former CCP prioritized claims with a collective dimension — cases that would have implications beyond the interests of individual litigants.
This is particularly important when using social media against an individual litigant, represented or otherwise.
What would the savings be to individual litigants?
The judge appears to have developed an extreme personal dislike towards the individual litigant.