Sentences with phrase «individual romantic attachments»

A possible example of this is «gokon», a Japanese word that translates as a group blind date or group dating, the idea being that a group of men and women will go out on a kind of combined date in the hope of making individual romantic attachments.

Not exact matches

Although there are a myriad of factors that lead individuals to form romantic attachments, a longstanding theory in relationship science makes a simple prediction.

Individuals or groups of people who want to meet other people for social purposes, romantic attachments, or jus...

Romantic Attachment Theory states that individuals have cognitive working models for relationships that influence expectations, affect, and behavior.

Research has uncovered two categories of secure attachment: Continuous - secures and earned - secures.1 My professor at the time was describing continuously secure (and / or insecure) individuals who develop an attachment in their childhood and carry that same attachment style into their adult romantic relationships.

The researchers found that the individuals who received the most sensitive care from their mothers at 18 months old also reported the most secure attachment to friends and romantic partners in early adulthood.

Whereas kissing is commonly perceived as a display of affection in romantic relationships, research highlights a far more nuanced explanation regarding the «function» of kissing within relationships.1 Some research suggests that kissing enables individuals to assess the quality of potential partners by putting individuals in close proximity, making it easier to examine features that are associated with mate value, such as breath and skin texture.2 Other research suggests that kissing elevates levels of arousal, which may lead to sexual intercourse.3 A third body of research suggests that kissing can influence feelings of attachment, alleviate stress, and increase relationship satisfaction.4 Given these varied explanations, the question remains: is there a single purpose for kissing or do all these explanations hold truth?

Although there are a myriad of factors that lead individuals to form romantic attachments, a longstanding theory in relationship science makes a simple prediction.

Reluctance to disclose inner thoughts and feelings, remaining guarded, and having desire for personal control are all signs of avoidant attachment.1, 2 Research shows that in adolescence and young adulthood, avoidant individuals do not connect as deeply (they have less intimacy and emotional closeness) with friends and romantic partners as secure individuals do, and this lack of connection largely results from less self - disclosure.

The Attachment Style Interview (ASI) inquires into an individual's support network and how he or she relates to his or her partner or romantic relationship (Bifulco, Moran, Ball, & Bernazzani, 2002).

Immediate influences, such as peer groups, school environments, family structure, relationships with family members, and exposure to stress, along with individual factors such as intelligence, personality, attachment style, self - esteem, delinquency, and substance abuse also influence a person's ability to develop healthy romantic relationships.

The psychological aim of affectional bonds between an individual and an attachment figure, seen in for example caregiver — child and adult romantic relationships, is to achieve or maintain emotional security.

All in all, attachment security appears to undergird successful interpersonal and romantic relationship interactions, and fostering attachment security has the potential to improve individuals» relationships with others.

Crying proneness and / or crying frequency have been found to be associated with a number of individual difference factors, including gender, temperament, attachment style, socialization, confrontation with stressful / traumatic life events, being engaged in a romantic relationship, and the transition to parenthood (Vingerhoets et al., 2009).

In adulthood, a romantic partner functions as a major source of security and support (Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1998) and therefore becomes an individual's primary attachment figure who provides a secure base and safe haven (Shaver & Mikulincer, 2010).

More specifically, he explored the relationship between attachment styles and the way that individuals cope with stress in their romantic relationship.

In 2007, Vicary and Fraley (2007) developed an online interactive relationship formation paradigm in order to assess individuals» romantic attachment styles.

Over time, the individuals with a history of insecure attachment models become adolescents and adults who are less successful in romantic, family and other relationships than their peers with secure models.

An explanation for this finding may be that dismissing individuals who are committed in relationships often remain independent and self - sufficient, allowing themselves to avoid unwanted intimacy or they may choose romantic partners with a similar attachment style [46].

In the classic transference paradigm, manipulated resemblance to a prior romantic partner led individuals to apply their attachment style with a past romantic partner (the prior significant other) to a potential dating partner, as reflected in self - reported anxiety and avoidance (Brumbaugh and Fraley, 2006).