Sentences with phrase «individual sea level records»

Not exact matches

Why use individual tide gauge records when we have perfectly good combinations, from much larger samples, which give a global picture of sea level change and show vastly less noise?
Individual model parameterizations were constrained by paleontological data, and the overall modeled relationship between global temperature and sea level matched well against records from four previous warm periods: preindustrial, the last interglacial, marine isotope stage 11, and the mid-Pliocene.
This especially applies to interpretation of acceleration in GMSL using only the 20 - year record of from satellite altimetry and to evaluations of short records of mean sea level from individual gauges.»
... Chambers et al. prudently state that «one should be cautious about computations of acceleration in sea level records unless they are longer than two cycles of the oscillation,» noting that this advice «applies to interpretation of acceleration in GMSL using only the 20 - year record of satellite altimetry and to evaluations of short records of mean sea level from individual gauges.»
Choice of GIA correction is critical in the trends for the local and regional sea levels, introducing up to 8 mm · yr − 1 uncertainties for individual tide gauge records, up to 2 mm · yr − 1 for regional curves and up to 0.3 — 0.6 mm · yr − 1 in global sea level reconstruction.
if no individual tide gauge records show a recent surge (and only a tiny fraction of long running ones show any trend change at all in recent decades), then claims that sea levels are surging are simply not tenable, for if GLOBAL sea levels are rising you would by logic alone expect that this would show up in actual single sites all over the globe.
You need a lesson in street smart logic: if no individual tide gauge records show a recent surge (and only a tiny fraction of long running ones show any trend change at all in recent decades), then claims that sea levels are surging are simply not tenable, for if GLOBAL sea levels are rising you would by logic alone expect that this would show up in actual single sites all over the globe.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z