Sentences with phrase «individual thing you say»

Think about each individual thing you say and do, and before reacting with your initial thought, catch yourself and do something differently before you fall into your comfort zone.

At first am a people person, love by most people.i am a genuine individual every thing i say is true don't reason for lieing.

Not exact matches

«Life is all about overcoming obstacles,» Will says, «and quite often you as an individual who has to get over those obstacles... but the truth is, you don't do most things in life on your own.

«It's not about being mediocre at three things, it's about gaining expertise in really individual areas of focus,» said Rahn.

«It gives every individual the opportunity to make sure the things that are important to them show up on their maps,» Maclean said.

«Other than that, I'd say the most important thing is that these individuals are creative, that they're innovative and that they're entrepreneurial in their thinking.»

It was a conscious decision at that point to say we kind of like the funky individual neighborhood bakery thing.»

«When it comes to establishing positive relationships with your coworkers, the most important thing is to get to know them first as individuals,» says Dorie Clark, author of Reinventing You.

In it, Mackey said the last thing the U.S. needed was «a massive new health - care entitlement,» and called for «less government control and more individual empowerment.»

«Cash, though, is to a business as oxygen is to an individual: never thought about when it is present, the only thing in mind when it is absent,» Buffett said.

Chin said the company is able to broadcast things like the Super Bowl live to tens of thousands of subscribers because each subscriber has an individual antenna and a unique copy of the broadcast, thus enabling it to be considered by some in the eyes of the law as a private performance rather than a public one.

«If the next president does the right things around immigration, corporate and individual tax reform, [and] infrastructure spending,» the banker said, «America would be booming.»

Verbal irony is when an individual says one thing but means another, like «It's my day.

«Things started hitting me this morning,» Phelps said on Thursday after winning his 26th medal and 22nd gold in the 200m individual medley.

One of the things I've done in my work is kind of show the hypocrisy of progressive people who say they believe in inequality, but when it comes to their individual choices about where they're going to live and where they're going to send their children, they make very different decisions, and I just didn't want to do that.

The other thing that's going on is that companies are starting to say to themselves that they don't want to hire individuals, they want to hire tasks to get done.

«One of the things when we meet with individuals is making sure that they've started with the problem in mind,» Bloomfield said.

But there's another type of individual he has a thing for — some might even say it's an addiction.

Republicans have said that among other things, they want to simplify individual income tax brackets, raise the standard deduction, reduce corporate tax rates and eliminate some popular itemized deductions, like the state and local tax break.

He said, «Real leaders are individuals who help us overcome the limitations of our own weakness, and selfishness, and laziness, and fears, and get us to do harder, better things than we can get ourselves to do on our own.»

«Mobility is crucial for the individual and the officer,» said Wasilewski, «Whether it's in an office, library, at home, or on the street, being able to do the things you need to do wherever you are is very important.»

«The most important things for the middle class are not on the piece of paper,» Mr. Holtz - Eakin said, referring to the details of the individual income tax plan.

It's not logically compatible for an individual to say they believe in Jesus as He is in the Bible but then not believe the very things He taught us.

I know even some believers are offended by some of the things I write, but to them I'll simply say this: the Word of God is the most powerful thing that exists - both the written word and the Living word; and it's time to start believing God and to take hold of the ident.ity that He has given you and live and use that ident.ity Lance Wallnau calls it the «believers edge» which unfortunately only 8 % of the body of Christ ever gets into - that rare realm that individuals mature to the place where they have the power to co-create with God and bring the future into the present.

And those who have the privilege of being selected to go to heaven, serve in an official capacity as «kings and priests» (Rev 1:6), not as equals to God, but as 144,000 individuals who recognize that God, whose name is Jehovah, is the Grand Creator of all the universe, with these ones casting their crowns before God's throne, saying: «You are worthy, Jehovah, even our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they existed and were created.»

So that being said, if I think someone is delusional for their certainty in god, how do you think I feel when that same individual says «and not only that, but I have this list of 10 things he doesn't want me to do, and I know what happens when I die, and I know jesus took away our sins, and I know Mary was a virgin but got pregnant anyway, and I know he turned water into wine...» and on and on ad nauseum.

Robert Kane & Stephen Phillips (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, Forthcoming), 16: «Leibniz's most important but largely ignored contribution, Hartshorne says, was his distinction between two types of things that can be formed when multitudes of low - grade individua1s are joined together: compound individuals and mere aggregates.

We can put this another way by saying that each individual entity from protons to people has an inner reality, a within of things, which makes them what they are to themselves.

They will often say that outreach and evangelism is the job of the individual Christian, and you will hear them say things like «Healthy sheep naturally reproduce.»

Or, take the Nazis, a classic example in which an entire society decided that genocide was a good thing (e.g. their own standard of morality) but we wouldn't accept that standard as correct or say that individual Nazis under such regime were doing the right thing when complying with the Nazi standard of morality.

Though I do think that many alcoholics don't have direct control over their situation because of a chemical dependancy that is produced due to an individuals genetics, personality, and levels of dependency (which is not a negative thing per say, it's just that certain people do have genetic predispositions to addiction).

Whilst our spiritual intellect's knowing of physical things is said to need as object the uniquely knowable universal, the final object of our spiritual, intellectual knowing is proposed as the non-universal individual.

Now, this might seem nit - picky, but unless you've already had discussions that define «Devine», it can mean different things to different people... and while she said «the Divine smashed the bottle»... that doesn't necessarily in my mind equate with «divine intervention in individual's lives» which was your term.

The easiest thing to grasp about the City of God is that it is not the City of Man — that is to say, that all existing moral - political authority is all - too - human, and that every individual represents some promise, some meaning, some destiny far beyond anything that can be represented in the economy of an actual political - cultural world.

As any group or individual becomes more enlightened, educated, sane, well — there is a strong tendency to leave the church and I do not equivocate when I say that this is a very, very good thing.

But now if the individual, yes, if you, my listener, and I must admit to ourselves that we were far from living in this way, far from that purity of heart which truthfully wills but one thing; must admit to ourselves that the questions demanded an answer, and yet in another sense, in order to avoid any deception, did not require an answer, in that they were, if anything, charges against ourselves which in spite of the form of the question changed themselves into an accusation: then should the individual, and you, my listener, and I join together in saying, «Indeed our life is like that of most others»?

It at once becomes clear, when we adopt this altered standpoint, that the purpose of a new Declaration of the Rights of Man can not be, as formerly, to ensure the highest possible degree of independence for the individual in society, but to define the conditions under which the inevitable totalization of Mankind may be effected, not only without impairing but so as to enhance, I will not say the autonomy of each of us but (a quite different thing) the incommunicable singularity of being which each of us possesses.

How, in God's name, is such a weak, ignorant, foolish individual entrusted with the rites of priesthood when this crime has happened so much for so long — how is it possible that the Pope, or any Bishop, or any Priest could say such a stupid thing as the child seduces the adult who is entrusted with upholding the highest morals of all?

If such a word confirmed something an individual already sensed God saying to them, that would be one thing.

A former British Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was once reported as saying that there is no such thing as society, only individuals and their families.

He who has learned that to exist as the individual is the most terrible thing of all will not be fearful of saying that it is great, but then too he will say this in such a way that his words will scarcely be a snare for the bewildered man, but rather will help him into the universal, even though his words do to some extent make room for the great.

In 1926 John Maynard Keynes, not yet the most celebrated economist of this century, said: «The political problem of mankind is to combine three things: economic efficiency, social justice, and individual liberty.»

Or, the individuals who say slavery is immoral don't understand nuance of situations and wrongly consider things that are not the same «slavery» as they know and falsely think that all things they call «slavery» are the same and are equally immoral.

Herx says the school's priest called her a «grave, immoral sinner» and told her she should have kept mum about her fertility treatments because some things are «better left between the individual and God,» the complaint said.

This idea, of the individual at prayer being a point at which things start to happen, enables us to say something about intercession.

«It's the right thing to do because for individuals... made equally in the sight of God, with equal worth - it's right that they have the same opportunities,» he said.

«On one hand, a lot of it just has to do with a culture of the individual, with like the cult of the self, so these people who kind of refuse to integrate become leaders of this thing,» he says, remembering seeing other young Christians who were developing into ministry personalities.

The qualities of an individual, «however permanent [and peculiar] they may be, neither help nor hinder its individual existence... they are but accidents, that is to say, they are not involved in the mode of being of the thing; for the mode of being of the individual thing is existence; and existence lies in opposition merely» (1.458).

But the things that it says all point to the heart of the individuals involved.

But to be entirely consistent Speculation must also say, «The thing of being an individual sinner, that's not to be anything, it is subsumed under the concept, waste no time on it etc.» And then what further?