Part 1 of the Children and Adoption Act 2006, which came into force this week, gives the courts more flexible powers to facilitate child contact, and requires
individuals party to proceedings to take part in activities that promote contact with their children.
Not exact matches
In February 2017 however, Mr. Amidu withdrew his suit seeking an oral examination, explaining that the change of government under the New Patriotic
Party under His Excellency the President, Nana Addo Dankwah Akuffo Addo and his Attorney General, Miss Gloria Akuffo's assurance
to retrieve all judgment debts wrongfully paid
to individuals Mr. Woyome in response prayed the Supreme Court
to stay
proceedings on the oral examination since he had filed for a review on the case.
It shall be a routine use of records in this system
to disclose them in
proceedings before any court or adjudicative or administrative body before which DOT or any agency thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her
individual capacity where DOT has agreed
to represent the employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT determines that the proceeding is likely
to affect the United States, is a
party to the proceeding or has an interest in such proceeding, and DOT determines that use of such records is relevant and necessary in the proceeding, provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines that disclosure of the records in the proceeding is a use of the information contained in the records that is compatible with the purpose for which the records were collected.
(a) Whenever the Attorney General receives a complaint in writing signed by an
individual to the effect that he is being deprived of or threatened with the loss of his right
to the equal protection of the laws, on account of his race, color, religion, or national origin, by being denied equal utilization of any public facility which is owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of any State or subdivision thereof, other than a public school or public college as defined in section 401 of title IV hereof, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment,
to initiate and maintain appropriate legal
proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly progress of desegregation in public facilities, the Attorney General is authorized
to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such
parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of
proceedings instituted pursuant
to this section.
(2) signed by an
individual, or his parent,
to the effect that he has been denied admission
to or not permitted
to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment,
to initiate and maintain appropriate legal
proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint
to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time
to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint,
to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such
parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of
proceedings instituted pursuant
to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States
to issue any order seeking
to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school
to another or one school district
to another in order
to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court
to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
Court
proceedings are public; nearly everything that happens in a court is public information (aside from issues of national security as decided by panels of judges and / or grand juries; or issues of safety for
individuals and / or witnesses who are
party to the
proceedings).
The commencement of
proceedings can also be used
to exploit the disclosure and discovery provisions of the rules of court,
to chivvy an uncooperative
individual into negotiations and
to signal the commitment of a
party to a particular position.
The lawyers in our administrative law group also represent
parties to administrative
proceedings, including
individuals and corporations, and act as prosecuting counsel on behalf of a number of different professional bodies and self - governing associations.
Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care
to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative
party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by
individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave
to intervene in ongoing
proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association,
to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged
to consider Khadr's right
to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.
One of the most important benefits of divorce litigation in New York State (as opposed
to the mediation or collaborative law process) is the ability of a
party's divorce attorney
to issue discovery subpoenas
to third
parties to obtain records related
to a spouse's income, employment, businesses, credit card and bank accountants and other such records from
individuals or business entities that are not
parties to the divorce
proceedings.
The provision requiring a covered entity
to make efforts
to notify an
individual that his or her records will be used in
proceedings is similar
to current practice; attorneys for plaintiffs and defendants agreed that medical records are ordinarily produced after the relevant
party has been notified.
In certain instances, however, the final rule permits covered entities
to disclose protected health information for judicial and administrative
proceedings without notice
to the
individual if the
party seeking the request has made reasonable efforts
to seek a qualified protective order, as described in the rule.
Due
to the interest and legal obligation of a regulated
individual or entity
to cooperate with its supervisor, administrative
proceedings are usually less time consuming than criminal investigations, where the accused
party is not under any obligation
to cooperate (nemo tenetur).
Respondent
parties to native title
proceedings have historically included a wide range of groups and
individuals such as recreationists, pastoralists, miners, local governments and industry bodies, many of whom derive their interest in the land from government.
In collaborative divorce
proceedings a couple is guided by their
individual attorneys
to consider all of the options for the business, including exercising the buy - sell agreement or crafting a strategy for both
parties to stay in the business post-divorce.
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure
to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the
proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails
to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior
to entering into listing agreement and fails
to timely provide agency disclosure form
to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails
to make it clear for which
party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right
to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right
to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties
to seller clients by misleading them as
to buyer's ability
to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty
to seller by referring seller
to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker
to use listing agreements providing for broker
to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker
to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject
to the approval of the
parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported
to change the terms of the listing agreement
to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed
to amend purchase agreement
to reflect amendment
to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme
to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and
to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability
to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails
to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and
individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained