Sentences with phrase «individuals within society»

Contemporary visual arts are at the heart of our nation and are central to what makes us expressive and creative individuals within society.

His questioning of the political, social and economic scenes in contemporary Mali is evident in how AIDS, wars, ecological issues, human rights, globalisation affects all aspects of life and individuals within society.

This Situation (2007) enables a conversation that throws into question our self - image as a society and our roles as individuals within that society.

As time went on, civilization developed, and the role of individuals within society grew more specialized.

The third point is a by - product of the previous two — with more information, organised in more ways, the media experiences of individuals within a society are likely to be more differentiated.

Salvation could come not for individuals within that society, but only for society as a whole, when the sin of slavery was abolished.

For that reason, someone whose personal character becomes clearly manifest in its willingness to accept compassionately the excluded and forgotten, those whose lives are burdened with shame, will be exceptionally disruptive both to society and the individuals within that society.

Otherwise, with only your quote from above to go on, it seems that you would agree that if a given society, such as Uganda, or a tribe within Uganda, has agreed that homosexuality is ethically inadmissable, then the individuals within that society would be wrong to dissent from what has been generally accepted by social contract and common consent?

Political theorists, going as far back as John Stuart Mill and John Dewey, have long argued that exposure to diverse perspectives is vital both to a robust civil society and to the development of individuals within those societies.

Artes Mundi 4 winner Yael Bartana uses documentation, simulations and re-enactments to explore the relationship of the individual within society.

The sculptor found in him a kindred spirit, sharing political views on the responsibility of the artist in the community and more broadly the individual within society.

Yael Bartana uses documentation, simulations and re-enactments to explore the relationship of the individual within society.

Not exact matches

We're not individuals, we're always people within families, communities and societies.

I could care less what individual people believe or practice within their own segment of society, but the LDS church is organized around a very well - enforced «church first» principle.

His solution, following his own reading of Whitehead's doctrine of societies, is to argue that an organism or compound individual entity exists wherever one of its constituent subsocieties is dominant over the other subsocieties within the organism (PEW 215).

I suppose there will always a tension between the need for security or an illusion thereof, and freedom; both within each individual and society.

The problem facing American society is this: it is increasingly difficult to avoid the «accident» of free time that can not be justified within an individual's work - oriented world.

They met those problems on the new level of an inter-racial, international fellowship entered by free personal choice, but all subsequent Christian history bears witness to the fact that the adjustment between society and the individual, both within the church and out of it, still remained one of the most crucial problems of mankind.

If any members of the Church including also individual bishops were to demand that the Church should alter her constitution in a way contradicting her dogmatically defined self - understanding, such movement in favour of change would actually no longer take place within the Church but outside, for those demanding such a change could no longer belong to the Church in the full sense of a visible society.

Whereas sociology studies the nature of society and the interplay between the individual and society, education studies the learning ability of man at various stages and tries to find those teaching methods which will be most fruitful in leading the individual to full maturity within his society.

«A higher religion imposes a conflict, a division, torment and struggle within the individual... we escape from this strain by attempting to revert to an identity of religion and culture which prevailed at a more primitive stage; as when we indulge in alcohol as an anodyne, we consciously seek unconsciousness» (Notes, p. 68) Typically, Eliot did not attempt to lessen the strain; rather, he saw the church as the «salt of the earth,» affecting society at its deepest levels.

Others believe that the social and cultural fruits of religious awakening will appear gradually if we are patient, arguing that once individual Christians are spiritually reborn in great numbers, they will inevitably act as salt and leaven within the society.

I believe that one of the best routes to the center of Whitehead's perspective is to view his metaphysics as an elaboration of a basic value assumption in which the primacy of process and the ultimacy of constitutive relations reflect a drive in the universe toward the evocation of greater complexity, deeper intensity, and wider range of contrasts within the organic unity of an individual or society.

He felt that individuals living within a society must obey the rules of the government as well as those laws proscribed by their religion.

It is a vast society, the widest of all societies, which lays down the obligation on everything which is that it conform to its very general sort of social order; it socializes into its extensive mold all the individuals which arise within it, just as we in our culture «Americanize» all the children born into it.

In our history, in our society, in our churches, the heterosexual box is that into which girls are pressed into ladies who should marry and who must be held within the social order as subordinate to husbands, fathers, or father - surrogates — regardless of the unique and individual capacities, needs, and desires of either women or men.

Only because our species evolved within such societies do we now have, each of us, the capacity to experience reflective self - consciousness and develop an individual identity.

Most individuals in simpler societies are better adjusted to those societies and to their roles within them.

Carl Henry, for example, was able to respond to Jim Wallis's characterization of the communal, over against the individual, nature of the gospel by saying that he agreed with Wallis's communal definition.67» But Henry's individualistic view of people within human society, while allowing for the community of the church, the importance of the family, and a limited function for the state, remains largely atomistic.

Paul's answer to the question as to what the vices are that characterize society as a whole including those who criticize other individuals within it is found in Romans 1:28 - 32.

The community defined by these two concepts is what our human nature really craves, and what it must have if it is not to be in conflict with itself both within the individual and within society.

Consequently, without routine, social relations within a society would be capricious and chaotic, subject to the fluctuations of individual whim or the expediencies of the moment.

More importantly, it awaits the emergence of a dynamic, responsive agency capable of coordinating the activities of a human society as a whole, within which human individuals might find themselves to be the willing, freely responsive instrumentalities of a higher will.

In the encyclical Evangelium Vitae, the Pope expressed this relationship within the framework of the common good: «It is urgently necessary, for the future of society and the development of a sound democracy, to rediscover those essential and innate human and moral values which flow from the very truth of the human being and express and safeguard the dignity of the person: values which no individual, no majority, and no State can ever create, modify, or destroy, but must only acknowledge, respect, and promote.»

This gives the individual who is overwhelmed by the trauma he encounters in society something to do within the direction of an answer.»

they are simply reaching out to those individuals within a religious society that feel they are being forced into a belief because of others, & that is simply not right in the same way it would not be right for you to eat fast food when you did nt want to & everyone around you is telling you to.

As noted above, the concrescing actual entities within a given structured society prehend in different ways a common world, i.e., the concrete interrelatedness of their immediate predecessors together with the common element of form which bound them together as this rather than that society.2 This feeling of both emerging out of and yet still belonging to a unified whole is then incorporated into their individual processes of concrescence.

It is doubtful whether social transformations that might open us to the otherness within society could really become actual unless individual persons within that society simultaneously learn to accept the «shameful» otherness within themselves.

The state is the climactic moment in Hegel's philosophy of objective Spirit and his Philosophy of Right.14 Rationality and freedom both achieve their peak within the concrete structures of human society in the state, which exists as a result of the actions of individual finite spirits and is in virtue of this the result of the movement of the Spirit in history.

Within a community organized along the lines of a Whiteheadian society, on the other hand, a single individual or a small group may indeed speak and act for all the other members as their representatives.

The differentiation between religion and the state that is said to characterize modern societies, for example, focuses squarely on processes within individual societies.

But within any society that seeks to be just and good, a tension will inevitably arise between individual freedom and the right of the state to limit freedom for moral and social reasons.

It is true, as Hall points out, that for Whitehead ordering principles are «immanent» within particular occasions (see UP 261 - 70), but in most cases those ordering principles also reflect the «mutual relations» of individuals, as well as the «community in character» pervading groups or societies of individuals (AI 142).13 This is particularly true of persons: the relations between occasions which constitute the human body and brain, and the «community of character» of the succession of personal experiences, give an essential element of unity to human experience.

Admittedly, Whitehead seems to solve this problem of the transmission of a common element of form for an ongoing society of actual occasions in a different way, namely, with his doctrine of objectification whereby individual concrescing actual entities positively and negatively prehend the eternal objects ingredient in their predecessors within the same society and «transmute» them into an eternal object suitable for the society as a whole (Process 25, 27, 41 - 42).

The prophets after the Exile are of a lesser breed, and most of the authors of the period are anonymous members of the community who give expression to a wide range of religious experience as it comes to individuals living within the framework of a religious society.

For example, «cultural minorities seek more than the right of their individual members to equality and participation within the larger society.

Today the environment within which most of us live and work is a media environment, an over-arching web of mediated symbols, processes, stories and values that surrounds, gives shape to, and interprets most things we do as individuals and as a society.

The third of the major functions of traditional religious faith is to provide a body of belief structures which serve to harmonise the many disparate ideas, experiences and institutions within society in such a way that individual as well as corporate needs and aspirations are given expression.

Yet it is still true that within the family is a nucleus of growth, action, and character development which determines largely the course each individual will take, and through the aggregate of many individuals the course of society as a whole.

Either way, homophobia is classed as other: an illiberal force from outside our society, or a twisted psychological seed from within an evil individual.