Sentences with phrase «indivisible nature»

work in a collaborative way that recognises the universal and indivisible nature of human rights

Not exact matches

Indeed, the classical Aristotelian nature and the Christian idea of the human being as body and soul united as an indivisible and integrated whole are excluded from the outset.

Everything in God's creation is interrelated, and one can not separate protection of the environment from protection of humanity: Again citing Benedict, Francis observes that «the world can not be analyzed by isolating only one of its aspects, since «the book of nature is one and indivisible,» and includes the environment, life, sexuality, the family, social relations, and so forth.»

When Dorothee Sölle wrote in 1971 of the indivisible salvation of the whole world, she and her readers assumed without reflection that the whole world is the world of human beings.1 But as the seventies progressed and the environmental crisis forced itself on public attention, more and more Christians became troubled about the separation of humanity from the rest of nature.

Because spirit as a genuine and indivisible mode of being is a primordial datum in transcendental experience in which man knows himself as one single spiritual and corporeal being, man has an underivative nature which is present either totally or not at all.

Of all these artists, Pollock probably made the most radical contribution to art since Picasso because of his entirely new and original approach to the very act of painting which was indivisible from the nature of his imagery.

For injunctions, the opinion suggested that although they are indivisible by nature, even a national court which is only competent to rule on part of the damages that have occurred would still be competent to rule on all other remedies available under national law (including a request to correct false information).

Given that the nature of the injuries were similar between the two accidents, the principle of indivisible injuries was considered by the Court.

However, the panel either misunderstood or, I suppose we have to assume, felt that on the evidence the loss had to treated as also having been caused by the portion of the defendant's conduct which was the wrongful conduct because the nature of the loss made it indivisible.