It would be President Obama, standing alone, breaking a campaign promise to act to protect the climate from chaos
induced by human action.
Not exact matches
«Without urgent
action, the expansion of logging operations and the spread of wildfires fuelled
by human -
induced climate change mean that tropical forests are likely to become increasingly degraded, conserving only a fraction of the breath - taking diversity they once harboured.»
The rate and magnitude of future
human -
induced climate change and its associated impacts are determined
by human choices defining alternative socio - economic futures and mitigation
actions that influence emission pathways.
In this context, for the Administration to have released a U.S. Climate
Action Report with a chapter on climate change impacts that identified a range of likely adverse consequences, based on scientific reports including the National Assessment, could rightly be seen as an anomaly and appeared to be seen as a significant political error
by Administration allies dedicated to denying the reality of
human -
induced global warming as a significant problem.
Brandon Gates's commentary as in point 1) is based the premise that dangerous
human - caused global warming requiring immediate radical mitigating
action is occurring and has been since ~ 1800 and any observations that do not accord with or contradict that a priori assumption are airily dismissed
by «that is the way CO2
induced warming occurs».
The calls for
action to prevent further
human -
induced global warming,
by contrast, are based on an enormous body of research
by thousands of scientists over more than a century that has been subjected to intense — and sometimes ferocious — scrutiny.