If you concede that climate skeptics have not proven in peer - reviewed journals that
human -
induced warming is not a very serious
threat to human health and ecological systems, given that
human -
induced warming could create catastrophic warming the longer the
human community waits
to respond
to reduce the
threat of climate change and the more difficult it will be
to prevent dangerous warming, do you agree that those nations most responsible for rising atmospheric ghg concentrations have a duty
to demonstrate that their ghg emissions are safe?
If you concede that climate skeptics have not proven in peer - reviewed journals that
human -
induced warming is not a very serious
threat to human health and ecological systems, given that
human -
induced warming could create catastrophic warming the longer the
human community waits
to respond
to reduce the
threat of climate change and the more difficult it will be
to prevent dangerous warming, do you agree that those responsible for rising atmospheric ghg concentrations have a duty
to demonstrate that their ghg emissions are safe?