Sentences with phrase «infant children not»

Not exact matches

Charlie Gard, an infant who suffers from a DNA depletion syndrome, reportedly may not be moved to a Vatican children's hospital for treatment.

There is a lack of padding on the back panel of the baby carrier and small infants might not be as comfortable as older children.

There are old people, mentally challenged people, sick people, wounded people, infants, children, that can't survive without assistance.

Look it up for yourself: the GOP has cut school lunch programs, Aid to dependent children, Planned Parenthood health care which provides medical care for expectant mothers (under the guise that they perform a limited number of abortions annually), Medicare programs which provides health care to the children who were born in the past because they weren't aborted, WIC which provides food to Women, Infants and Children... one coulchildren, Planned Parenthood health care which provides medical care for expectant mothers (under the guise that they perform a limited number of abortions annually), Medicare programs which provides health care to the children who were born in the past because they weren't aborted, WIC which provides food to Women, Infants and Children... one coulchildren who were born in the past because they weren't aborted, WIC which provides food to Women, Infants and Children... one coulChildren... one could go on.

Soon he came to doubt the validity of infant baptism on the ground that it was unscriptural, and that a child could not consciously accept in faith the baptismal covenant.

This cruelty is compounded in light of the responsible deity having infinite alternatives which would not have involved inflicting severe terror, suffering and pain upon children and infants.

``... as it is certainly in the power of a mother to give strong food to her infant, but the child is not yet able to receive more substantial nourishment; so it was possible for God to have made man perfect from the first, but man could not receive this [perfection], being as yet an infant.

With respect, that you see removing a non-sentient embryo / fetus as comparable to the drowning / hacking to death of sentient children / infants suggests a lack of reasonable empathy (perhaps you don't have children and have never felt the helplessness in watching them suffer through pain?).

Never mind that these are parents who have dreams of their children in danger all the time, a mom having a dream of their infant in danger happens... um... I don't know every 5 seconds?

These conditions are not always associated with evil; indeed, they are sometimes necessary, as in the pain of childbirth, the separation of mother and child, the helplessness of an infant.

My critics reject the argument that the ruling violates the religious liberty rights of Jews and Muslims; they maintain that, on the contrary, infant circumcision violates the rights of children to bodily integrity and religious liberty, since they can not consent to being circumcised.

Now there may not be a large supply of newborn infants which are what most adoptive parents want and they may have to wait 2 years for the child of their dreams, but if any parents out there have a safe caring home to share with some orphaned children you do not have to wait 2 years, so don't sell your lies here.

The bible is wrong over and over again and while some claim to find spiritual guidance, they apparently don't mind worshiping a deity who demands children and infants be slaughtered.

If it doesn't mean «deserving of hell» or «someone who is guilty of wrongdoing» (as even small children, presumably infants, are sinners), then what does it actually * mean *?

I understand I shouldn't expect a rational response, but still, I always find it amusing how theists like yourself justify your deity which first commanded not to murder, then turned around and said, well, ok, go ahead and murder these children and infants.

You can not put violent acts of rage and vengeance that killed millions of people, including innocent children, infants and babes in the womb on one side of a balance and then claim that the loving God presented by Jesus makes the sides equal.

(Palin has five children, including an infant with Down syndrome), and I'm not sure how evangelicals strongly committed to complementarian worldviews are rationalizing their support.

He makes a similar argument to yours that it is ok to slaughter even infants and children, if that is what your god wants in cases where he doesn't want do do the terrible deeds himself, as he did when he supposedly wiped out almost all of humanity with a flood or sent a plague to kill 70,000 Israelites (2 Samuel 24:1 - 15), because David conducted a census, Yahweh caused him to conduct.

8 The infant will play near the cobra's den, and the young child will put its hand into the viper's nest.

And if he chose to drown all of humanity, including infants and children, except 8 people, though he apparently didn't realize at the time that his mass slaughter would not change humanity's ways, then, in your eyes, that is a moral act.

The Hebrews now occupied the land of Israel after killing probably hundreds of thousands of people (Canaanites, Amalekites, women, children, infants, evil cattle) who had it coming anyway because they were super wicked and did not follow God's law which they had never heard of anyway.

Thus says the Lord of hosts,... «Go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.»

3 «Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.»»

The hyperbolic victory statement in Joshua 10, interpreted correctly, doesn't mean that every man, woman, child, and infant was slain by the Israelites.

It shouldn't be surprising that apologists will defend biblical chattel slavery given they are equally willing to defend the slaughter of children and infants; completely disregarding any notion of judgment based on an exercise of free will, completely disregarding any notion of empathy for their suffering, and with complete rejection of any personal moral culpability in offering their various incarnations of a Nuremberg defense by placing their self - serving deference to perceived authority over any and all other moral considerations.

The insistence by supporters of abortion on demand that only «wanted children» be allowed to be born has not improved our infant mortality rates, which have remained among the worst in the industrialized world; nor has it helped us cope effectively with the incidence of child abuse, the frequency and severity of which have increased dramatically during this time.

Make sure to turn away when riding in your Republican limo so you won't have to risk seeing the many good Catholics in Tampa, the many people who will be without aid to women, infants and children that your fat cat buddies want to cut while they protect their friend's Swiss bank accounts and their defense contractor masters unnecessary contracts.

Better still, taking into account your position that God can do as God pleases and such choices are beyond mortal moral criticism, just cut to the chase and tell us when it is and when it isn't morally acceptable to slaughter children and infants should one be faced with such a perceived divine command?

There were Hiroshima and Nagasaki where nuclear bombs killed thousands of people in a flash: not only soldiers, but also women and children and unborn infants.

For our people, baptism of infants is not just a sacrament of initiation of our Catholic Church, but also a biological - anthropological event which binds the child and the community together in a profound and lasting blood - spiritual relationship.

However, a spokesperson for the FDA told the Associated Press that despite the detection of some melamine traces in three leading US - made infant nutrition products, the levels were extremely low and did not require parents to reconsider their children's» diets.

Children under the age of 18 are not permitted on the Show floor, including infants.

This action not only serves to further protect infants and small children from the potential dangers of BPA, but also to recognize and address ongoing consumer concerns about the safety of BPA - containing products.

Raw honey should not be given to infants or children under 1 year old.

If you child has been using infant formula, more times than not, they have been consuming a milk product like whey protein that has been further processed than Naked Whey.

Okay, truth be told, I ate them since I was a child (not an infant) but never made them until I was in college.

Such seats are particularly dangerous for parents with infants (babies should not even be allowed there), children (how many elementary school kids are riveted to each pitch for a three - hour game?)

These terms refer to the evolved nest for young children that matches up with their maturational schedules: soothing perinatal experiences, extensive infant - initiated breastfeeding, constant touch, caregiver responsiveness, free play, multiple adult caregivers and extensive positive social support.

The time that our children are infants and toddlers is so fleeting in the grand scheme of things, we should be embracing them, not pushing them away.

In Bangladesh, where infant formula isn't readily accessible, affordable or safe for most families, 98 percent of babies are breastfed and the average age of weaning is 33 months (source: WHO Global Data Bank on Infant and Young Child Feeinfant formula isn't readily accessible, affordable or safe for most families, 98 percent of babies are breastfed and the average age of weaning is 33 months (source: WHO Global Data Bank on Infant and Young Child FeeInfant and Young Child Feeding).

When my young child was an infant I did not leave him cry for long periods of time... this is how one builds trust with their child.

Reply: One does not force back the infant and child foreskin to clean under it.

The thought that a child would not turn to their parent in a time of need simply because they cried a little when they were an infant is very interesting!

I've made a few errors along the way, in regards to not realizing I needed to teach my nursing infant to fall asleep on his own because I never had this issue with my other children.

• Where new mothers are depressed, fathers» positive parenting (self - reported) plus substantial time spent in caring for his infant, was found to moderate the long - term negative effects of the mothers» depression on the child's depressed / anxious mood — but not on their aggression and other «externalising» behaviours (Mezulis et al, 2004).

Do note that these aren't suitable for infants and small children.

An example might be in the area of positive discipline for applicants who have infants and have not yet had the opportunity to practice positive discipline with their own children.

But not all vaccines are effective or recommended for children and infants.

When a child is left to cry alone, however, that infant does not suddenly realize, «oh, I'm being silly... mommy and daddy are downstairs listening to me on the monitor and will come up later».

As to children being spoiled by AP... that would mean that children were spoiled and bratty through most of human history since AP (not permissive or helicopter parenting, which is very, very different) is reflective of the methods previously used to nurture infants and young children.