Research suggests that premature
infants are at higher risk of cardiovascular problems later in life.
Formula - fed
infants are at a high risk of exposure to life - threatening bacterial contamination.
Young
infants are at a higher risk of dying from this infection than any other age group.
First, parents need to know whether
their infant is at high risk of developing a peanut allergy, Assa'ad says.
Topics include: avoiding certain foods during pregnancy and breastfeeding; how to know if
an infant is at high risk of developing food allergies; how to introduce solids to a high - risk infant; what formulas are recommended for high - risk infants; and if food allergies can be prevented.
Since premature
infants are at high risk of neonatal complications, particularly affecting the brain and respiratory and digestive systems, survival rates without serious neonatal disease are lower.
Vinny Smith, Chief Executive of Meningitis Research Foundation (MRF) said: «Young
infants are at higher risk of life threatening meningitis than any other age group.
In addition, the authors found high concentrations of pertussis antibodies in infants during the first 2 months of life, a period during which
infants are at the highest risk of pertussis - associated illness or death.
It is also critical that supplemental feeding be extremely small in volume and frequent (every hour) as
these infants are at high risk of aspiration pneumonia when more than a drop or two at a time is fed.
Not exact matches
One major study from the UK found that by eating a peanut - containing snack,
infants who
were at high risk for developing a peanut allergy
were able to prevent developing the allergy.
Infants aged < 9 months
are at higher risk for developing encephalitis from yellow fever vaccine, which
is a live virus vaccine.
From my read of it, these guidelines
are particularly targeted
at infants with
higher risk for allergies (i.e. those with parents / siblings who have allergies).
There
is also evidence that premature babies
are at higher risk when given artificial
infant food.
Rather a good way of preventing food allergies
is exclusively breast - feeding a
high -
risk infant for
at least four months; this decreases the chance of having certain allergies during the first two years of life.
Babies younger than 4 months,
are at the
highest risk for SIDS (Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome) and
being overheated
is one possible cause.
Infants and toddlers have the
highest risk because they have the
highest level of exposure
at a time when
risks to reproduction and neural development
are greatest.
Some foods have proteins that
are so different that if you delay feeding it to an
infant until they
are over a year, like peanuts and shellfish, they will
be at a
higher risk of developing an allergy to it.
While Babycenter states that these commercially produced foods
are safe for babies to consume, since they have
been produced
at temperatures
high enough to kill the spores, Kidshealth.org and some child health experts warn that because the spores
are so heat - resistant, there could still
be a small
risk of contracting
infant botulism.
When
infants are not optimally breastfed they
are at risk for increased illness such as
higher rates of gastrointestinal and respiratory infections, allergies, cancer, obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes and even death.
What researchers do know
is that certain factors put
infants at higher risk of SIDS, and that all caregivers, perhaps grandparents, in particular, need to know how to reduce the
risk of SIDS.
For this reason, artificial supplements should not
be given to
infants who
are at a
high risk for allergies.
The effectiveness of these intervention strategies
was demonstrated by a study in the Netherlands in which 100 6 - month - old
infants who displayed
high levels of irritability shortly after birth
were deemed to
be at risk of developing insecure attachment.
There isn't data confirming the safety or lack of safety of bed - sharing multiples, but other studies have shown that bed - sharing with other children places an
infant at higher risk of SIDS.
It may also help explain why the US does comparatively well for perinatal outcomes but very badly in terms of
infant mortality, if massive,
high tech, emergency, intervention, which
is readily available, has kicked the can down the road, past the neonatal period, but the baby dies
at some later date (and it will
be higher risk for the rest of infancy,
at least, due to prematurity).
Many twins and multiples
are born premature, and the
risk of SIDS
is higher for premature babies than for
infants born
at full term.
Looking
at preterm birth, which
is a
risk factor for newborn
infant loss, a 2003 study examined 1,962 women and found that those who reported
high counts of anxiety
were more likely to experience preterm labor and subsequent birth.
As for those who believe that sleep - training harms
infants, we have no research evidence that babies who
are sleep - trained
are at higher risk of behavioral and psychiatric disorders later in life.
This
is especially true for
infants that
are2 to 4 months old; this
is the time when they
are at the
highest risk for SIDS.
A prospective study8 of a Tasmanian
high -
risk birth cohort of 6213
infants reported no increase in cyanosis, pallor, or breathing symptoms
at age 5 weeks for
infants sleeping in the supine position, and, in fact, the
risk for these symptoms
was increased among
infants sleeping in the prone position.
As we continue to identify
risk factors for lactation insufficiency (variations in
infant oral anatomy, hypoplastic breast appearance or insufficient glandular development,
high pre-pregnant body mass index, insulin resistance, other hormonal irregularities), it
is extremely important that mothers, whether they believe they
are «
at risk» or not, identify appropriate breastfeeding support before their babies
are born.
As a result of the LEAP study, groups such as the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, now state that for
infants at high risk, there
is strong evidence to support the introduction of peanut between 4 and 11 months.
Very young
infants,
infants born prematurely, and
infants whose bodies have trouble fighting off germs
are at highest risk.
Infants born before the 37th week of pregnancy
are premature, which places them
at a
higher risk for complications than full - term babies, explains HealthyChildren.org, a website published by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Infants are most
at risk: Their BPA exposure can
be 12 times
higher than adults.
And some studies suggest co-sleeping puts babies
at higher risk for SIDS (sudden
infant death syndrome), especially when parents drink too much, smoke or fail to make sure the bed
is safe.
You report that starting your
infant at 4 months can lead to allergies and digestive issues, but if you
are up to date on current evidence, early introduction of
high risk foods can actually prevent allergies.
If an
infant is determined to
be high risk, peanut - containing foods should
be introduced in a specialist's office as an oral food challenge after peanut skin testing, or not
at all if the child has too large of a skin test, which may suggest the child already has peanut allergy.
Kenneth K. Chen, MD,
is the director of the Division of Obstetric and Consultative Medicine and co-director of the Integrated Program for
High Risk Pregnancy
at Women &
Infants Hospital.
Swaddle means Safe Babies who sleep on their stomachs
are at higher risk of SIDS (Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome).
The psychosocial outcome receiving the most attention from researchers
is problem behaviour, with most studies finding perceived negative reactivity in infancy to predict problem behaviour in childhood33, 34 and adolescent.35 Specifically,
infants prone to
high levels of fear, frustration, and sadness, as well as difficulty recovering from such distress,
were found to
be at increased
risk for internalizing and externalizing problem behaviours according to parental and / or teacher report.
A study conducted by researcher
at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children of 2184 children determined that the
risk of asthma and wheezing
was approximately 50 per cent
higher for formula fed
infants when compared to their breastfed counterparts.
For example, four - month - olds who show
high levels of motor activity and distress, called
high - reactive,
are likely to become inhibited to the unfamiliar
at 1 - 2 years old and report more unrealistic worries and more frequent bouts of depression
at age 18, whereas low - reactive
infants are likely to become uninhibited to the unfamiliar in the second year and
are at a slightly
higher risk for asocial behaviour
at age 18.
A physician may recommend fluoride supplementation for
infants who
are at least six months of age who
are at high risk of deficiency.
Infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology (ART) may
be at even
higher risk of complications (Murray 2014); consequently, admission to the neonatal unit
is more likely.
Infants aged 2 to 6 months
are at highest risk, and children 6 to 12 months
are still
at risk.
And this inflammatory use of a «relative percentage
risk» rather than relative
risk or absolute
risk... for example, even if assuming the writer
's awkward data
is valid, you can to look
at infant living rates and see 99.6 % vs 98.4 %, which means there
's only a 1.2 %
higher risk of bad outcome from
at - home birth than hospital.
All sorts of hilarious errors — using one type of data (ICD10 code data from «white healthy women» and essentially comparing the best possible data from one set of hospital data related to low -
risk births to the worst possible single set of data related to
high -
risk at - home births)-- if you use the writer's same data source for hospital births but include all comers in 2007 - 2010 (not just low -
risk healthy white women), the
infant death rate
is actually 6.14 per 1000, which
is «300 %
higher death rate than
at - home births!»
Preterm and low birth weight
infants are also
at higher risk.
In their study, Sicherer and the other doctors tested more than 500
infants who
were at high risk for peanut allergies.
However, in contrast, the observational arm of this study (in which
infants were not
at high risk of developing atopic disease) did not demonstrate differences in the incidence of atopic dermatitis.